Cited by 112Endometriosis Research and TreatmentReproductive Biology and FertilityReproductive Health and Technologies

Use of oral contraceptives in women with endometriosis before assisted reproduction treatment improves outcomes

Open access
de Ziegler, Dominique, Gayet, Vanessa, Aubriot, François Xavier, Fauque, Patricia, Streuli, Isabelle, Wolf, Jean Philippe, de Mouzon, Jacques, Chapron, Charles·2010·Fertility and Sterility

Abstract

In women with endometriosis, including those with endometriomas, 6 to 8 weeks of continuous use of oral contraception (OC) before assisted reproduction treatment (ART) maintains ART outcomes comparable with the outcomes of age-matched controls without endometriosis. In contrast, ART outcomes are markedly compromised in endometriosis patients who are not pretreated with OC. Ovarian responsiveness to stimulation was not altered by 6 to 8 weeks' use of pre-ART OC, including in poor responders with endometriomas.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.05.056

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There is insufficient evidence to recommend prolonged administration of combined oral contraceptives (COC)/progestogens as a pre-treatment to ART to increase live birth rates.

    “There is insufficient evidence to recommend prolonged administration of the combined oral contraceptives (COC)/progestogens as a pre-treatment to ART to increase live birth rates (de Ziegler et al., 2010).”

    From ESHRE guideline: endometriosis (2022) · cites this paper as de Ziegler et al., 2010

  • Pretreatment with oral contraceptives for 6-8 weeks has been reported to improve ART outcome in endometriosis.

    “Subsequently, a similar benefit of ART outcome has been reported with 6-8 weeks of pretreatment with oral contraceptives (55).”

    From Endometrial receptivity in adenomyosis and/or endometriosis (2023) · cites this paper as [55]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 21 · Cited by 112

Authors
de Ziegler, D., Gayet, V., Aubriot, F. X., Fauque, P., Streuli, I., Wolf, J. P., de Mouzon, J., & Chapron, C.
Affiliations
  • Hôpital Cochin (FR)
  • University of Geneva (CH)
Venue
Fertility and Sterility
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-12
Volume
94
Issue
7
Pages
2796-2799
ISSN
0015-0282 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2048769205
Cited by
112
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 10
FWCI
9.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Fertility and Sterility (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Endometriosis Research and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Biology and Fertility
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Reproductive Health and Technologies
Keywords
endometriosis, oral contraceptives, endometrioma, ovulation induction, poor responders, ovarian response, ART outcomes
MeSH terms
Adult, Combined Modality Therapy, Contraceptives, Oral, Drug Administration Schedule, Endometriosis, Female, Humans, Infertility, Female, Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone, Ovulation Induction, Pregnancy, Prognosis, Uterine Diseases, Treatment Outcome, Triptorelin Pamoate, Reproductive Techniques, Assisted

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review