Cited by 26Reproductive Health and TechnologiesAssisted Reproductive Technology and Twin PregnancyReproductive System and Pregnancy

Triple ultrasound markers including fetal cardiac activity are related to miscarriage risk

Open access
Bae, Soyoung, Karnitis, Joseph·2011·Fertility and Sterility

Abstract

Objective To identify early ultrasound markers in pregnant patients that predict a favorable pregnancy outcome.Design Retrospective case-control study.Setting Infertility patients in fertility clinic.Patient(s) 1051 women with early pregnancies conceived after fertility treatment.Intervention(s) None.Main outcome measure(s) Ongoing pregnancy >20 weeks' gestation.Result(s) Ongoing pregnancy rate was 90.5% for those pregnancies having early fetal cardiac activity (odds ratio [OR] = 66.5). Gestational sac diameter ≥12 mm was associated with ongoing pregnancy rate of 91.9%. Small gestational sac diameter, <8 mm, was associated with high miscarriage rate, 85.3%. Ongoing pregnancy rates for yolk sac diameter <2 mm, 2-6 mm, and >6 mm were 20%, 89.2%, and 20%, respectively (OR = 33.1, 2-6 vs <2 mm; OR = 33.1, 2-6 vs >6 mm). Ongoing pregnancy rate was 94% when all three markers were present.Conclusion(s) On postconception days 33-36, gestational sac diameter ≥12 mm, yolk sac diameter 2-6 mm, and the presence of fetal cardiac activity were favorable markers.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.08.009

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 36 · Cited by 26

Authors
Bae, S., & Karnitis, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Toledo Medical Center (US)
  • ProMedica Toledo Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Bae, Soyoung
Venue
Fertility and Sterility
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-11
Volume
96
Issue
5
Pages
1145-1148
ISSN
0015-0282 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2030779618
Cited by
26
References
36
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Fertility and Sterility (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Reproductive Health and Technologies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Reproductive System and Pregnancy
Keywords
fetal cardiac activity, miscarriage risk, gestational sac diameter, yolk sac diameter, ongoing pregnancy rate, early pregnancy, infertility, infertility treatment, pregnancy outcome prediction
MeSH terms
Abortion, Spontaneous, Echocardiography, Female, Fetal Heart, Gestational Age, Humans, Infertility, Ohio, Predictive Value of Tests, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Outcome, Retrospective Studies, Risk Factors, Yolk Sac, Logistic Models, Odds Ratio, Ultrasonography, Prenatal, Risk Assessment, Reproductive Techniques, Assisted, Gestational Sac

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review