Triple ultrasound markers including fetal cardiac activity are related to miscarriage risk
Open accessAbstract
Objective To identify early ultrasound markers in pregnant patients that predict a favorable pregnancy outcome.Design Retrospective case-control study.Setting Infertility patients in fertility clinic.Patient(s) 1051 women with early pregnancies conceived after fertility treatment.Intervention(s) None.Main outcome measure(s) Ongoing pregnancy >20 weeks' gestation.Result(s) Ongoing pregnancy rate was 90.5% for those pregnancies having early fetal cardiac activity (odds ratio [OR] = 66.5). Gestational sac diameter ≥12 mm was associated with ongoing pregnancy rate of 91.9%. Small gestational sac diameter, <8 mm, was associated with high miscarriage rate, 85.3%. Ongoing pregnancy rates for yolk sac diameter <2 mm, 2-6 mm, and >6 mm were 20%, 89.2%, and 20%, respectively (OR = 33.1, 2-6 vs <2 mm; OR = 33.1, 2-6 vs >6 mm). Ongoing pregnancy rate was 94% when all three markers were present.Conclusion(s) On postconception days 33-36, gestational sac diameter ≥12 mm, yolk sac diameter 2-6 mm, and the presence of fetal cardiac activity were favorable markers.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Sonographic findings in early pregnancy have prognostic value in predicting pregnancy outcomes.
“Several studies have demonstrated that sonographic findings in early pregnancy have prognostic value in predicting pregnancy outcomes.”
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 36 · Cited by 26
- Authors
- Bae, S., & Karnitis, J.
- Affiliations
- University of Toledo Medical Center (US)
- ProMedica Toledo Hospital (US)
- Corresponding author
- Bae, Soyoung
- Venue
- Fertility and Sterility
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-11
- Volume
- 96
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1145-1148
- ISSN
- 0015-0282 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2030779618
- Cited by
- 26
- References
- 36
- Citations by year
- 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 1.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Fertility and Sterility (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Reproductive Health and Technologies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Reproductive System and Pregnancy
- Keywords
- fetal cardiac activity, miscarriage risk, gestational sac diameter, yolk sac diameter, ongoing pregnancy rate, early pregnancy, infertility, infertility treatment, pregnancy outcome prediction
- MeSH terms
- Abortion, Spontaneous, Echocardiography, Female, Fetal Heart, Gestational Age, Humans, Infertility, Ohio, Predictive Value of Tests, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Outcome, Retrospective Studies, Risk Factors, Yolk Sac, Logistic Models, Odds Ratio, Ultrasonography, Prenatal, Risk Assessment, Reproductive Techniques, Assisted, Gestational Sac
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review