Dietary glycemic index is associated with less favorable anthropometric and metabolic profiles in polycystic ovary syndrome women with different phenotypes
Open accessAbstract
Objective To compare glycemic index (GI) in the usual diet of polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) and control women and to investigate whether dietary GI is associated with body composition and anthropometric and metabolic variables across PCOS phenotypes. Design Cross-sectional study. Setting University hospital outpatient clinic. Patient(s) Sixty-one women with PCOS and 44 nonhirsute women with ovulatory cycles. Intervention(s) Metabolic work-up, biochemical and hormonal assays, assessment of body composition and rest metabolic rate, physical activity (pedometer), and food consumption (food frequency questionnaire). Main outcome measure(s) GI, glycemic load, dietary intake, and hormone and metabolic profile in PCOS versus control and in PCOS women stratified by tertiles of GI and PCOS phenotype. Result(s) Mean age was 23.7 ± 6.3 years. Participants with PCOS had higher body fat percentage, fasting insulin, insulin resistance, lipid accumulation product, and androgen levels compared with control women. PCOS and control women in the highest tertile of GI had higher body mass index and waist circumference than those in the lowest tertile. Dietary GI was higher in the classic PCOS group. Obesity and this more severe PCOS phenotype explained 28.3% of variance in dietary GI. Conclusion(s) Dietary GI is increased in the classic PCOS phenotype and associated with a less favorable anthropometric and metabolic profile. Obesity and classic PCOS phenotype are age-independent predictors of higher dietary GI.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Individuals with PCOS have higher body weight, fat mass, body fat percentage, BMI, waist circumference, and waist-to-hip ratio compared to individuals without PCOS.
“Individuals with PCOS have been shown to have higher body weight [20], fat mass [21], body fat percentage [10,22], body mass index (BMI) [14,20,23,24], waist circumference (WC) [10,20], and waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) [10,11,15,20,23,24,25] compared to individuals without PCOS.”
From Moving beyond Weight: A Narrative Review of the Dietary and Lifestyle Management for Reducing Cardiometabolic Risk in Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS) (2023) · cites this paper as [22]
Observational studies including individuals with PCOS with a healthy BMI still identified a higher prevalence of cardiometabolic risk factors between individuals with and without PCOS.
“observational studies that have included individuals with PCOS with a healthy BMI (18.5–24.9 kg/m2) still identified a higher prevalence of cardiometabolic risk factors between individuals with and without PCOS [10,11,21,22,23,25,28,30,31,33].”
From Moving beyond Weight: A Narrative Review of the Dietary and Lifestyle Management for Reducing Cardiometabolic Risk in Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS) (2023) · cites this paper as [22]
Individuals with PCOS have significantly higher glucose concentrations, post-load glucose, insulin concentrations, post-load insulin, and insulin resistance than individuals without PCOS.
“Individuals with PCOS have presented with significantly higher glucose concentrations [21], post-load glucose [10,20,28], insulin concentrations [10,15,20,21,22,24,29,30], post-load insulin [10,25,31], and insulin resistance [10,14,20,21,29] than individuals without PCOS.”
From Moving beyond Weight: A Narrative Review of the Dietary and Lifestyle Management for Reducing Cardiometabolic Risk in Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS) (2023) · cites this paper as [22]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 74 · Cited by 79
- Authors
- Graff, S. K., Mário, F. M., Alves, B. C., & Spritzer, P. M.
- Affiliations
- Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre (BR)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (BR)
- Corresponding author
- Spritzer, Poli Mara
- Venue
- Fertility and Sterility
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-10
- Volume
- 100
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1081-1088
- ISSN
- 0015-0282 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2148158905
- Cited by
- 79
- References
- 74
- Citations by year
- 2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 4 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 7.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Fertility and Sterility (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (INCT 573747/2008-3)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Ovarian function and disorders
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diet, Metabolism, and Disease
- Keywords
- polycystic ovary syndrome, dietary glycemic index, PCOS phenotypes, obesity, insulin resistance, body composition, anthropometric profile, metabolic profile, androgens, lipid accumulation product, fasting insulin, waist circumference, body mass index
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Analysis of Variance, Blood Glucose, Cross-Sectional Studies, Diet, Female, Hospitals, University, Humans, Insulin, Insulin Resistance, Lipids, Obesity, Outpatient Clinics, Hospital, Phenotype, Polycystic Ovary Syndrome, Risk Factors, Sex Hormone-Binding Globulin, Testosterone, Biomarkers, Body Mass Index, Chi-Square Distribution, Linear Models, Case-Control Studies, Glycemic Index, Body Size, Adiposity, Waist Circumference, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review