Cited by 60Sperm and Testicular FunctionReproductive Health and TechnologiesMale Reproductive Health Studies

Status of sperm morphology assessment: an evaluation of methodology and clinical value

Open access
van den Hoven, Leonie, Hendriks, Jan C.M., Verbeet, Jozé G.M., Westphal, Johan R., Wetzels, Alex M.M.·2015·Fertility and Sterility

Abstract

Objective To characterize methodological changes in sperm morphology assessment and to correlate sperm morphology with clinical outcome. Design In this observational study, sperm morphology profiles of patients were analyzed. The percentages of morphologically normal spermatozoa were evaluated with respect to changes in morphology assessment criteria; male aging; and prognostic value for outcomes after in vitro fertilization (IVF)/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). Setting Diagnostic and clinical laboratories. Patient(s) A total of 8,846 men who visited the diagnostic laboratory; 133 samples from a sperm bank; and 3,676 IVF/ICSI couples. Intervention(s) None. Main outcome measure(s) The percentage of morphologically normal spermatozoa in semen samples. The regression of the individual morphologically normal cell profiles. The relation between the percentage of normal forms with pregnancy outcome after IVF/ICSI. Result(s) The percentage of morphologically normal spermatozoa showed a decrease from roughly 30%-80% in 1984 to 0%-10% since 2004. With added evidence from sperm bank samples, this decrease was found to be attributable mainly to changes in morphology assessment criteria. Furthermore, an intraindividual aging effect of 0.51% per year was observed. A statistically significant relationship was found between decreases in percentage of normal forms and a lower probability of ongoing pregnancies after IVF, although the area under the curve was only 54%. Conclusion(s) Methodological changes had a strong effect on the percentage of morphologically normal spermatozoa over the past few decades. In addition, male aging results in decreasing sperm morphology. The percentage of morphologically normal spermatozoa has no prognostic value for individual IVF/ICSI patients.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.09.036

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • According to Van den Hoven et al., the percentage of normal forms was correlated with ongoing pregnancy rate with an OR of 1.06 [1.02-1.16] after conventional IVF (n = 2323).

    “According to Van den Hoven et al. [98], the percentage of normal forms was correlated with ongoing pregnancy rate with an OR of 1.06 [1.02–1.16] after conventional IVF (n = 2323).”

    From Recommendations for Human Sperm Morphology Assessment in 2025: An Expert Review From the French BLEFCO Group (2026) · cites this paper as [98]

    The “Sperm Morphology and Pregnancy” section reports 2,323 IVF treatments and a statistically significant association between the percentage of normal spermatozoa and ongoing pregnancy. It gives an OR of 1.09 (95% CI 1.02–1.16), not the claimed 1.06; Table 1 confirms the 1.09 figure. The supplied passages do not identify an exact page. (LLM, conf=0.94)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Van den Hoven et al. concluded that sperm morphology is not a useful tool to predict ongoing pregnancy rate after conventional IVF.

    “The authors concluded that sperm morphology is not a useful tool to predict ongoing pregnancy rate after conventional IVF.”
  • There was a statistically significant relationship between a decreased percentage of normal forms and lower chances of ongoing pregnancy after conventional IVF, with an area under the curve of only 54%.

    “There was a statistically significant relationship between a decreased percentage of normal forms and lower chances of ongoing pregnancy after conventional IVF, with however an area under the curve of only 54%.”
  • In a study by van den Hoven et al. of 1353 ICSI attempts, the percentage of normal forms was not correlated with the ongoing pregnancy rate.

    “In a study by van den Hoven et al. [98] of 1353 ICSI attempts, the percentage of normal forms was not correlated with the ongoing pregnancy rate.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 20 · Cited by 60

Research works printed but not linked: 23

  1. World Health Organization. Laboratory manual for the examination of hu- man semen and semen-cervical mucus interaction. Singapore: Press Concern; 1980.
  2. World Health Organization. Laboratory manual for the examination of hu- man semen and semen-cervical mucus interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1987.
  3. World Health Organization. Laboratory manual for the examination of hu- man semen and sperm-cervical mucus interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1992.
  4. World Health Organization. Laboratory manual for the examination of hu- man semen and sperm-cervical mucus interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1999:128.
  5. World Health Organization (WHO). Laboratory manual for the examination and processing of human semen. Geneva: WHO; 2010:271.
  6. Menkveld R. An investigation of environmental influences on spermatogen- esis and semen parameters [dissertation]. Stellenbosch (South Africa): Univ. of Stellenbosch; 1987 (in Afrikaans).
  7. Mortimer D, Menkveld R. Sperm morphology assessment-historical per- spectives and current opinions. J Androl 2001;22:192-205.
  8. Kruger TF, Menkveld R, Stander FS, Lombard CJ, Van der Merwe JP, van Zyl JA, et al. Sperm morphologic features as a prognostic factor in in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 1986;46:1118-23.
  9. Guzick DS, Overstreet JW, Factor-Litvak P, Brazil CK, Nakajima ST, Coutifaris C, et al. Sperm morphology, motility, and concentration in fertile and infertile men. N Engl J Med 2001;345:1388-93.
  10. Coetzee K, Kruge TF, Lombard CJ. Predictive value of normal sperm morphology: a structured literature review. Hum Reprod Update 1998;4: 73-82.
  11. Van Waart J, Kruger TF, Lombard CJ, Ombelet W. Predictive value of normal sperm morphology in intrauterine insemination (IUI): a structured literature review. Hum Reprod Update 2001;7:495-500.
  12. Menkveld R, Holleboom CA, Rhemrev JP. Measurement and significance of sperm morphology. Asian J Androl 2011;13:59-68.
  13. Menkveld R. Clinical significance of the low normal sperm morphology value as proposed in the fifth edition of the WHO Laboratory Manual for the Ex- amination and Processing of Human Semen. Asian J Androl 2010;12:47-58.
  14. Palermo G, Joris H, Devroey P, Van Steirteghem AC. Pregnancies after intra- cytoplasmic injection of single spermatozoon into an oocyte. Lancet 1992; 340:17-8.
  15. Menkveld R, Wong WY, Lombard CJ, Wetzels AM, Thomas CM, Merkus HM, et al. Semen parameters, including WHO and strict criteria morphology, in a fertile and subfertile population: an effort towards stan- dardization of in-vivo thresholds. Hum Reprod (Oxf) 2001;16:1165-71.
  16. Lukassen HG, Braat DD, Wetzels AM, Zielhuis GA, Adang EM, Scheenjes E, et al. Two cycles with single embryo transfer versus one cycle with double embryo transfer: a randomized controlled trial. Hum Reprod (Oxf) 2005;20: 702-8.
  17. Brandes M, Hamilton CJ, van der Steen JO, de Bruin JP, Bots RS, Nelen WL, et al. Severity of oligo-asteno-teratozoospermia no longer determines over- all success rate in male subfertility. Int J Androl 2011;34:614-23.
  18. Nijs M, Creemers E, Cox A, Franssen K, Janssen M, Vanheusden E, et al. Chromomycin A3 staining, sperm chromatin structure assay and hyaluronic acid binding assay as predictors for assisted reproductive outcome. Reprod Biomed Online 2009;19:671-84.
  19. De Vos A, Van De Velde H, Joris H, Verheyen G, Devroey P, Van Steirteghem A. Influence of individual sperm morphology on fertilization, embryo morphology, and pregnancy outcome of intracytoplasmic sperm in- jection. Fertil Steril 2003;79:42-8.
  20. Souza Setti A, Ferreira RC, Paes de Almeida Ferreira Braga D, de Cassia Savio Figueira R, Iaconelli A Jr, Borges E Jr. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection outcome versus intracytoplasmic morphologically selected sperm injection outcome: a meta-analysis. Reprod Biomed Online 2010;21:450-5.
  21. Piedrahita JA. The role of imprinted genes in fetal growth abnormalities. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol 2011;91:682-92.
  22. Dekker G, Robillard PY, Roberts C. The etiology of preeclampsia: the role of the father. J Reprod Immunol 2011;89:126-32.
  23. Dam AH, Ramos L, Dijkman HB, Woestenenk R, Robben H, van den Hoven L, et al. Morphology of partial globozoospermia. J Androl 2011;32:199-206.

Authors
van den Hoven, L., Hendriks, J. C. M., Verbeet, J. G. M., Westphal, J. R., & Wetzels, A. M. M.
Affiliations
Radboud University Medical Center (NL)
Venue
Fertility and Sterility
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-01
Volume
103
Issue
1
Pages
53-58
ISSN
0015-0282 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2018184314
Cited by
60
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 1
FWCI
3.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Fertility and Sterility (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Sperm and Testicular Function
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Reproductive Health and Technologies
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Male Reproductive Health Studies
Keywords
sperm morphology, methodological change, male aging, in vitro fertilization, intracytoplasmic sperm injection, pregnancy outcomes, prognostic value, semen analysis
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aging, Female, Humans, Infertility, Male, Male, Netherlands, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Outcome, Prognosis, Sensitivity and Specificity, Spermatozoa, Reproducibility of Results, Prevalence, Treatment Outcome, Age Distribution, Sperm Injections, Intracytoplasmic, Semen Analysis, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review