Cited by 181Endometriosis Research and TreatmentMicroRNA in disease regulationExtracellular vesicles in disease

Circulating microRNAs as potential biomarkers for endometriosis

Open access
Cho, SiHyun, Mutlu, Levent, Grechukhina, Olga, Taylor, Hugh S.·2015·Fertility and Sterility

Abstract

Objective To evaluate whether microRNAs (miRNAs) associated with endometriosis are detectable in the circulation and could serve as potential noninvasive biomarkers for endometriosis.Design Case-control study.Setting University hospital.Patient(s) Twenty-four women with endometriosis and 24 women without the disease (controls).Intervention(s) Serum samples collected from women undergoing laparoscopy for endometriosis and other benign gynecologic disease.Main outcome measure(s) Total RNA extracted from serum and quantitative reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction to determine levels of miRNA let-7a-f and miR-135a,b.Result(s) The levels of circulating let-7b and miR-135a were statistically significantly decreased in women with endometriosis compared with controls, and let-7d and 7f showed a trend toward down-regulation. Let-7b expression strongly correlated with serum CA-125 levels and showed the highest area under the curve of 0.691. When the patients were analyzed according to phase of the menstrual cycle, the expression of let-7b, 7c, 7d, and 7e was statistically significantly lower in the women with endometriosis during the proliferative phase. Using a logistic regression model, we evaluated the diagnostic power of differently expressed miRNAs; the combination of let-7b, let-7d, and let-7f during the proliferative phase yielded the highest area under the curve value of 0.929 in discriminating endometriosis from controls.Conclusion(s) Several circulating miRNAs are differentially expressed in the sera of women with endometriosis compared with controls. The combination of serum let-7b, 7d, and 7f levels during the proliferative phase may serve as a diagnostic marker for endometriosis.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.02.013

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There is a discrepancy between the level of miRNA expression in tissues and in blood.

    “Furthermore, there seems to be a discrepancy between the level of miRNA expression in tissues (111) and in blood (109).”

    From Biomarkers in endometriosis: Challenges and opportunities (2017) · cites this paper as [109]

  • Cho et al. showed that the circulating level of let-7b can be used as a reliable biomarker with 83.3% sensitivity and 100% specificity in diagnosis of endometriosis.

    “Cho et al. showed that the circulating level of let-7b can be used as a reliable biomarker with 83.3% sensitivity and 100% specificity in diagnosis of endometriosis (109).”

    From Biomarkers in endometriosis: Challenges and opportunities (2017) · cites this paper as [109]

  • A limiting factor hindering the exploration of miRNA as biomarkers in clinical trials is the small sample sizes of patients and lack of representation of all stages of endometriosis, stratified by menstrual stage.

    “However, one limiting factor hindering the exploration of miRNA as biomarkers in clinical trials is the small sample sizes of patients and lack of representation of all stages of endometriosis, which are also stratified by menstrual stage (85, 109, 110).”

    From Biomarkers in endometriosis: Challenges and opportunities (2017) · cites this paper as [109]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 53 · Cited by 181

Authors
Cho, S., Mutlu, L., Grechukhina, O., & Taylor, H. S.
Affiliations
  • Yonsei University (KR)
  • Yale University (US)
Corresponding author
Taylor, Hugh S.
Venue
Fertility and Sterility
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-05
Volume
103
Issue
5
Pages
1252-1260.e1
ISSN
0015-0282 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2045663983
Cited by
181
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 1
FWCI
18.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Fertility and Sterility (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • YUHSpace (Yonsei University Medical Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (R01ES010610)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (U54HD052668, R01HD036887)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Endometriosis Research and Treatment
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › MicroRNA in disease regulation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Extracellular vesicles in disease
Keywords
endometriosis, circulating microRNAs, serum biomarkers, non-invasive diagnosis, let-7 family, miR-135a, CA125, menstrual cycle phases, proliferative phase, diagnostic accuracy
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Endometriosis, Female, Genetic Markers, Hospitals, University, Humans, Middle Aged, Predictive Value of Tests, ROC Curve, Logistic Models, Case-Control Studies, Area Under Curve, Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction, MicroRNAs, Cell Proliferation, Young Adult, Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review