Cited by 96Endometriosis Research and TreatmentReproductive Health and ContraceptionMenstrual Health and Disorders

Control of endometriosis-associated pain with etonogestrel-releasing contraceptive implant and 52-mg levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system: randomized clinical trial

Open access
Carvalho, Nelsilene, Margatho, Deborah, Cursino, Kleber, Benetti-Pinto, Cristina L., Bahamondes, Luis·2018·Fertility and Sterility

Abstract

Objective To assess the efficacy of an etonogestrel (ENG)-releasing contraceptive implant or the 52-mg levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) in the control of endometriosis-associated pelvic pain.Design Noninferiority randomized clinical trial in which women with endometriosis were assigned to use an ENG implant (experimental treatment) or an LNG-IUS (active comparator). Monthly follow-up visits were conducted up to 6 months.Setting University teaching hospital.Patient(s) One hundred three women, with endometriosis-associated chronic pelvic pain, dysmenorrhea, or both for more than 6 months. In cases of deep endometriosis, vaginal ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging were used as additional diagnostic tools.Intervention(s) The ENG implant or the LNG-IUS were inserted within the first 5 days of the menstrual cycle.Main outcome measure(s) Daily scores of noncyclic pelvic pain and dysmenorrhea were evaluated using a daily visual analogue scale. Health-related quality of life was evaluated using the Endometriosis Health Profile-30 questionnaire at baseline and up to 6 months. Bleeding patterns were assessed daily from a menstrual calendar.Result(s) Both contraceptives improved significantly the mean visual analogue scale endometriosis-associated pelvic pain and dysmenorrhea, without significant differences between treatment group profiles. Health-related quality of life improved significantly in all domains of the core and modular segments of the Endometriosis Health Profile-30 questionnaire, with no difference between both treatment groups. The most common bleeding patterns at 180 days of follow-up were amenorrhea and infrequent bleeding and infrequent bleeding and spotting among ENG implant and LNG-IUS users, respectively.Conclusion(s) In this noninferiority study both contraceptives improved significantly pelvic pain, dysmenorrhea, and health-related quality of life in endometriosis.Clinical trial registration number Clinicaltrials.gov under number NCT02480647.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.07.003

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In a recent study comparing ENG-implant with 52-mg LNG-IUS, both contraceptives significantly improved pelvic pain, dysmenorrhea, and health-related quality of life in endometriosis.

    “A recent study evaluating the efficacy of ENG-implant versus the 52-mg LNG-IUS in the control of endometriosis-associated pelvic pain showed that both contraceptives improved significantly pelvic pain, dysmenorrhea, and health-related quality of life in endometriosis [241].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 28 · Cited by 96

Authors
Carvalho, N., Margatho, D., Cursino, K., Benetti-Pinto, C. L., & Bahamondes, L.
Affiliations
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) (BR)
Corresponding author
Bahamondes, Luis
Venue
Fertility and Sterility
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-11
Volume
110
Issue
6
Pages
1129-1136
ISSN
0015-0282 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2899183806
Cited by
96
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1
FWCI
8.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Fertility and Sterility (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (37228, 573747/2008-3)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Endometriosis Research and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Health and Contraception
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Menstrual Health and Disorders
Keywords
endometriosis, dysmenorrhea, levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system, hormonal contraception, health-related quality of life, menstrual bleeding patterns, non-inferiority
MeSH terms
Adult, Contraceptive Agents, Female, Drug Implants, Endometriosis, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Intrauterine Devices, Medicated, Levonorgestrel, Desogestrel, Pelvic Pain, Pain Management, Drug Liberation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review