The DOI matches its Crossref record; 63 of the 63 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Oocyte vitrification for fertility preservation for both medical and nonmedical reasons
Open accessAbstract
Growing evidence of successful outcomes achieved with the oocyte vitrification technique has greatly contributed to its application in the field of fertility preservation (FP). The population that can benefit from FP includes women at a risk of losing their ovarian function because of either iatrogenic causes or natural depletion of their ovarian reserve. Therefore, oncological patients and healthy women who wish to delay motherhood for various reasons-elective FP-are currently being offered this option. Satisfactory oocyte survival rates and clinical outcomes, including cumulative live birth rates, have been reported in recent years. These studies show that age at oocyte retrieval strongly affects reproductive prognosis after FP. Therefore, elective FP patients should be encouraged to decide before they reach the age of 35 years to significantly increase their chances of success. The effect of age has also been observed in patients with cancer and women diagnosed with endometriosis. The reproductive outcome after FP is worse in patients with cancer, but a direct association between the disease and reproductive outcome is yet to be proven. Young patients (≤35 years) with endometriosis who have undergone cystectomy before oocyte retrieval for FP have worse outcomes than nonoperated women in age-matched groups. In addition, the number of oocytes used per patient is closely related to success in all populations, with considerable improvement in the result with the addition of a few oocytes, especially in healthy young patients.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“In individuals with threats to ovarian reserve such as oncological patients and those with endometriosis, cumulative live birth rate after oocyte cryopreservation is associated with the number of vitrified oocytes.612”
From Clinical practice guidelines for the care of girls and women with Turner syndrome. (2024) · cites this paper as [612]
In the citing paper
“In general, 10 to 20 oocytes are needed for one live birth in non-TS individuals less than 35 years old.612”
From Clinical practice guidelines for the care of girls and women with Turner syndrome. (2024) · cites this paper as [612]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
PREGNANCY AFTER HUMAN OOCYTE CRYOPRESERVATION
Chen, C. (1986) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(86)90989-x · Cited by 1,011
Mature oocyte cryopreservation: a guideline
(2013) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.09.028 · Cited by 928
Highly efficient vitrification for cryopreservation of human oocytes and embryos: The Cryotop method
Kuwayama, M. (2006) · Theriogenology · doi:10.1016/j.theriogenology.2006.09.014 · Cited by 859
Rienzi, L. F., Gracia, C. R., Maggiulli, R., LaBarbera, A. R., Kaser, D. J., Ubaldi, F. M., Vanderpoel, S., & Racowsky, C. (2016) · Human Reproduction Update · doi:10.1093/humupd/dmw038 · Cited by 737
Cobo, A., Meseguer, M., Remohi, J. A., & Pellicer, A. (2010) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/deq146 · Cited by 557
Self-citationBirth following vitrification of a small number of human oocytes: Case Report
Kuleshova, L. L., Gianaroli, L., Magli, M. C., Ferraretti, A. P., & Trounson, A. (1999) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/14.12.3077 · Cited by 556
Oocyte vitrification as an efficient option for elective fertility preservation
Cobo, A. C., García-Velasco, J. A., Coello, A., Domingo, J., Pellicer, A., & Remohi, J. A. (2015) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.11.027 · Cited by 538
Self-citationOver 900 oocyte cryopreservation babies born with no apparent increase in congenital anomalies
Noyes, N., Porcu, E., & Borini, A. (2009) · Reproductive BioMedicine Online · doi:10.1016/s1472-6483(10)60025-9 · Cited by 501
Cobo, A. C., & Díaz‐García, C. (2011) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.06.030 · Cited by 411
Self-citationNiederberger, C., Pellicer, A., Cohen, J., Gardner, D. K., Palermo, G. D., O’Neill, C. L., Chow, S., Rosenwaks, Z., Cobo, A. C., Swain, J. E., et al. (2018) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.06.005 · Cited by 411
Self-citation
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Endometriosis-associated infertility: From pathophysiology to tailored treatment
Bonavina, G., & Taylor, H. S. (2022) · Frontiers in Endocrinology · doi:10.3389/fendo.2022.1020827 · Cited by 388
Clinical practice guidelines for the care of girls and women with Turner syndrome.
Gravholt, C. H., Andersen, N. H., Christin-Maitre, S., Davis, S. M., Duijnhouwer, A., Gawlik, A., Maciel-Guerra, A. T., Gutmark-Little, I., Fleischer, K., Hong, D., et al. (2024) · European Journal of Endocrinology · doi:10.1093/ejendo/lvae050 · Cited by 224
Fraison, É., Huberlant, S., Labrune, E., Cavalieri, M., Montagut, M., Brugnon, F., & Courbière, B. (2022) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/deac249 · Cited by 148
Fifteen years of autologous oocyte thaw outcomes from a large university-based fertility center
Cascante, S. D., Blakemore, J. K., DeVore, S., Hodes-Wertz, B., Fino, M. E., Berkeley, A. S., Parra, C. M., McCaffrey, C., & GRIFO, J. A. (2022) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2022.04.013 · Cited by 64
Fertility Preservation: How to Preserve Ovarian Function in Children, Adolescents and Adults
Dolmans, M., Hossay, C., Nguyen, T. Y. T., & Poirot, C. (2021) · Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.3390/jcm10225247 · Cited by 64
Metadata
- Authors
- Cobo, A., García-Velasco, J. A., Remohí, J., & Pellicer, A.
- Affiliations
- IVIRMA Global (ES)
- Universidad Rey Juan Carlos (ES)
- Corresponding author
- Cobo, Ana
- Venue
- Fertility and Sterility
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-05
- Volume
- 115
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1091-1101
- ISSN
- 0015-0282 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3159958283
- Cited by
- 165
- References
- 63
- Citations by year
- 2026: 24 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 53 · 2023: 39 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 5
- FWCI
- 5.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Fertility and Sterility (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Reproductive Biology and Fertility
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Reproductive Health and Technologies
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Physiology › Reproductive biology and impacts on aquatic species
- Keywords
- oocyte vitrification, fertility preservation, elective fertility preservation, ovarian reserve depletion, cancer patients, endometriosis, oocyte number, live birth rate, ovarian preservation
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Female, Humans, Medical Oncology, Oocytes, Cryopreservation, Elective Surgical Procedures, Reproductive Medicine, Vitrification, Fertility Preservation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
