Comparative analysis of mitochondrial genomes from closely related Rhynchosporium species reveals extensive intron invasion
Open accessAbstract
We sequenced and annotated the complete mitochondrial (mt) genomes of four closely related Rhynchosporium species that diverged ∼14,000-35,000years ago. During this time frame, three of the mt genomes expanded significantly due to an invasion of introns into three genes (cox1, cox2, and nad5). The enlarged mt genomes contained ∼40% introns compared to 8.1% in uninvaded relatives. Many intron gains were accompanied by co-conversion of flanking exonic regions. The comparative analysis revealed a highly variable set of non-intronic, free-standing ORFs of unknown function (uORFs). This is consistent with a rapidly evolving accessory compartment in the mt genome of these closely related species. Only one free-standing uORF was shared among all mt genomes analyzed. This uORF had a mutation rate similar to the core mt protein-encoding genes, suggesting conservation of function among the species. The nucleotide composition of the core protein-encoding genes significantly differed from those of introns and uORFs. The mt mutation rate was 77 times higher than the nuclear mutation rate, indicating that the phylogeny inferred from mt genes may better resolve the phylogenetic relationships among closely related Rhynchosporium species than phylogenies inferred from nuclear genes.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The identical mitochondrial genomes of the Swiss and clinical C. subhashii isolates are in contrast to studies reporting considerable intra-species variation in size, intron content, and recombination in fungal mitochondrial genomes.
“the identical mitochondrial genomes are in contrast to studies reporting considerable intra-species variation in size, intron content, and recombination in fungal mitochondrial genomes [104–106].”
From Competition assays and physiological experiments of soil and phyllosphere yeasts identify Candida subhashii as a novel antagonist of filamentous fungi (2017) · cites this paper as [106]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 70 · Cited by 63
- Authors
- Torriani, S. F. F., Penselin, D., Knogge, W., Felder, M., Taudien, S., Platzer, M., McDonald, B. A., & Brunner, P. C.
- Affiliations
- ETH Zurich (CH)
- Leibniz Institute of Plant Biochemistry (DE)
- Leibniz Institute on Aging - Fritz Lipmann Institute (FLI) (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Torriani, Stefano F.F.
- Venue
- Fungal Genetics and Biology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-01
- Volume
- 62
- Pages
- 34-42
- ISSN
- 1087-1845 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2089270899
- Cited by
- 63
- References
- 70
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3
- FWCI
- 1.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Fungal Genetics and Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Repository for Publications and Research Data (ETH Zurich) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- ETH Zürich Research Collection
- Funders
- ETH Zurich (TH-02 07-1)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Fungal and yeast genetics research
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Chromosomal and Genetic Variations
- Keywords
- Rhynchosporium, mitochondrial genome, intron gain, mitochondrial COI, cyclooxygenase-2, nad5, upstream open reading frames, accessory genome, mutation rate, phylogenetic resolution, fungal evolution, comparative genomics
- MeSH terms
- Ascomycota, DNA, Mitochondrial, Introns, Phylogeny, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Genome, Mitochondrial, Mutation Rate
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review