Cited by 63Genomics and Phylogenetic StudiesFungal and yeast genetics researchChromosomal and Genetic Variations

Comparative analysis of mitochondrial genomes from closely related Rhynchosporium species reveals extensive intron invasion

Open access
Torriani, Stefano F.F., Penselin, Daniel, Knogge, Wolfgang, Felder, Marius, Taudien, Stefan, Platzer, Matthias, McDonald, Bruce A., Brunner, Patrick C.·2014·Fungal Genetics and Biology

Abstract

We sequenced and annotated the complete mitochondrial (mt) genomes of four closely related Rhynchosporium species that diverged ∼14,000-35,000years ago. During this time frame, three of the mt genomes expanded significantly due to an invasion of introns into three genes (cox1, cox2, and nad5). The enlarged mt genomes contained ∼40% introns compared to 8.1% in uninvaded relatives. Many intron gains were accompanied by co-conversion of flanking exonic regions. The comparative analysis revealed a highly variable set of non-intronic, free-standing ORFs of unknown function (uORFs). This is consistent with a rapidly evolving accessory compartment in the mt genome of these closely related species. Only one free-standing uORF was shared among all mt genomes analyzed. This uORF had a mutation rate similar to the core mt protein-encoding genes, suggesting conservation of function among the species. The nucleotide composition of the core protein-encoding genes significantly differed from those of introns and uORFs. The mt mutation rate was 77 times higher than the nuclear mutation rate, indicating that the phylogeny inferred from mt genes may better resolve the phylogenetic relationships among closely related Rhynchosporium species than phylogenies inferred from nuclear genes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.fgb.2013.11.001

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 70 · Cited by 63

Authors
Torriani, S. F. F., Penselin, D., Knogge, W., Felder, M., Taudien, S., Platzer, M., McDonald, B. A., & Brunner, P. C.
Affiliations
  • ETH Zurich (CH)
  • Leibniz Institute of Plant Biochemistry (DE)
  • Leibniz Institute on Aging - Fritz Lipmann Institute (FLI) (DE)
Corresponding author
Torriani, Stefano F.F.
Venue
Fungal Genetics and Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-01
Volume
62
Pages
34-42
ISSN
1087-1845 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2089270899
Cited by
63
References
70
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3
FWCI
1.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Fungal Genetics and Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Repository for Publications and Research Data (ETH Zurich) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • ETH Zürich Research Collection
Funders
ETH Zurich (TH-02 07-1)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Fungal and yeast genetics research
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Chromosomal and Genetic Variations
Keywords
Rhynchosporium, mitochondrial genome, intron gain, mitochondrial COI, cyclooxygenase-2, nad5, upstream open reading frames, accessory genome, mutation rate, phylogenetic resolution, fungal evolution, comparative genomics
MeSH terms
Ascomycota, DNA, Mitochondrial, Introns, Phylogeny, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Genome, Mitochondrial, Mutation Rate

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review