Cited by 31Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationSimulation-Based Education in HealthcareInnovations in Medical Education

Enhancing communication and clinical reasoning in medical education: Building virtual patients with generative AI

Open access
Potter, Lewis, Jefferies, Chris·2024·Future Healthcare Journal

Abstract

Generative AI describes any form of artificial intelligence (AI) that can produce new text, images, video or other content. Large language models (LLMs) are a form of generative AI which can generate human-like text. They are trained on large amounts of text data and have been made popular by the launch of publicly available chatbots, including ChatGPT and Google Bard.1 Virtual patients simulate real-life clinical scenarios and can be used to teach knowledge, communication skills and clinical reasoning.2 Given the challenges learners can face in accessing opportunities to practice communication skills in person, particularly in busy healthcare environments, we aimed to develop a collection of realistic virtual patients using LLM technology. The virtual patients enable learners to practise their communication and clinical reasoning skills using a chatbot interface hosted on the Geeky Medics platform. A database of patient scripts was created, reflecting common patient presentations (e.g. chest pain, breathlessness). Each script consisted of a condensed summary of the patient's presentation, including relevant past medical and psychosocial history. Utilising OpenAI's GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 large language models, we developed an interactive chat interface that allows learners to engage with virtual patients generated from the patient scripts. Users can interact with the virtual patient via text or voice. This interaction mimics a real clinical encounter, facilitating natural conversation with the patient. After the consultation, learners can request an immediate AI-powered review of their transcript, which assesses the breadth and depth of their questioning to provide actionable feedback. Examples of feedback include commending areas covered well and highlighting important missed sections of the patient's history. Since their introduction on the Geeky Medics platform, learners have conducted over 45,000 consultations with virtual patients. Implementation challenges included user feedback about occasional 'hallucinations' and off-topic responses from the virtual patients. User feedback has generally been favourable, highlighting the independent aspect of the interactions and the opportunity for deliberate, repeated practice of complex communication skills, such as taking a sexual history. Our findings demonstrate the viability of using LLM technology, specifically GPT-3.5 and GPT-4, to create realistic virtual patients. Despite challenges like 'hallucinations' and off-topic responses, the high volume of consultations indicates strong engagement and potential for this tool to enhance communication and clinical reasoning skills. This approach offers a scalable, accessible way to supplement traditional clinical training, especially in environments with limited direct patient contact.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.fhj.2024.100043

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Potter, L., & Jefferies, C.
Venue
Future Healthcare Journal
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-04
Volume
11
Pages
100043
ISSN
2514-6645 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4395085952
Cited by
31
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 5
FWCI
2.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Future Healthcare Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
Keywords
virtual patients, generative AI, large language models, clinical communication skills, clinical reasoning, medical education, chatbots, GPT-3.5, GPT-4, AI-generated feedback, sexual history taking, hallucinations, simulation-based training

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review