Standardizing catch and effort data: a review of recent approaches
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Fishery data have been criticised for inducing biased conclusions about stock abundance trends because CPUE series may not accurately reflect trends of population abundance due to changes in fishing practice, efficiency of fleets or environmental effects on catchability.
“Fishery data have been criticised for inducing biased conclusions about stock abundance trends because CPUE series may not accurately reflect trends of population abundance due to changes in fishing practice, efficiency of the fleets or environmental effects on catchability, among others (see Maunder and Punt, 2004;Maunder et al., 2006;Polacheck, 2006).”
From Global habitat preferences of commercially valuable tuna (2015) · cites this paper as Maunder and Punt, 2004
Cites
Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach.
Guthery, F. S., Burnham, K. P., & Anderson, D. R. (2003) · The Journal of Wildlife Management · doi:10.2307/3802723 · Cited by 41,495 · see citing works
The Elements of Statistical Learning
Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R., & Friedman, J. (2009) · Springer Series in Statistics · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-84858-7 · Cited by 25,970 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Global habitat preferences of commercially valuable tuna
Arrizabalaga, H., Dufour, F., Kell, L., Merino, G., Ibaibarriaga, L., Chust, G., Irigoien, X., Santiago, J., Murua, H., Fraile, I., et al. (2015) · Deep Sea Research Part II: Topical Studies in Oceanography · doi:10.1016/j.dsr2.2014.07.001 · Cited by 194 · see citing works
Invasive lionfish reduce native fish abundance on a regional scale
Ballew, N. G., Bacheler, N. M., Kellison, G. T., & Schueller, A. M. (2016) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep32169 · Cited by 96 · see citing works
Trends in landings of fish species potentially affected by climate change in Portuguese fisheries
Teixeira, C. M., Gamito, R., Leitão, F., Cabral, H. N., Erzini, K., & Costa, M. J. (2014) · Regional Environmental Change · doi:10.1007/s10113-013-0524-5 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
Biology, fishery, conservation and management of Indian Ocean tuna fisheries
Gopalakrishna Pillai, N., & Satheeshkumar, P. (2012) · Ocean Science Journal · doi:10.1007/s12601-012-0038-y · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Design and redesign of a bottom trawl survey in Chesapeake Bay, USA
Latour, R. J., Gartland, J., & Bonzek, C. F. (2023) · Frontiers in Marine Science · doi:10.3389/fmars.2023.1217792 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
- Authors
- Maunder, M. N., & Punt, A. E.
- Affiliations
- Inter-American Tropical Tuna Commission (US)
- University of Washington (US)
- Corresponding author
- Maunder, Mark N.
- Venue
- Fisheries Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2004-12
- Volume
- 70
- Issue
- 2-3
- Pages
- 141-159
- ISSN
- 0165-7836 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1972376960
- Cited by
- 1,336
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 89 · 2025: 68 · 2024: 64 · 2023: 88 · 2022: 79 · 2021: 84 · 2020: 69 · 2019: 63 · 2018: 83 · 2017: 72 · 2016: 65 · 2015: 63 · 2014: 85 · 2013: 69 · 2012: 67
- FWCI
- 16.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Fisheries Research (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Marine and fisheries research
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Fish Ecology and Management Studies
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Census and Population Estimation
- Keywords
- catch rates, abundance indices, fish stock assessment, predictive factors, tuna, sharks, recreational and commercial fisheries
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
