Cited by 908Nanocomposite Films for Food PackagingAntimicrobial agents and applicationsPostharvest Quality and Shelf Life Management

Chitosan: antimicrobial activity, interactions with food components, and applicability as a coating on fruit and vegetables

Devlieghere, F, Vermeulen, A, Debevere, J·2004·Food Microbiology

Abstract

Chitosan has recently gained more interest due to its applications in food and pharmaceutics. Among others, the antimicrobial activity of chitosan has been pointed out as one of its most interesting properties of chitosan. The aim of this study was threefold: (1) the quantification of the antimicrobial effect of chitosan with a deacetylation degree of 94% and a molecular weight of 43 kDa on different psychrotrophic spoilage organisms and food pathogens. (2) The determination of the influence of different food components (starch, whey protein, NaCl and oil) on the antimicrobial effect of chitosan and (3) the investigation of the effects of chitosan coatings on controlling decay of minimally processed fruits and vegetables (strawberry and lettuce). For the first aim several bacteria and yeast were exposed to chitosan concentrations varying from 40 to 750 mg/l. Generally, Gram-negative bacteria seemed to be very sensitive for the applied chitosan (MIC < or = 0.006% (w/v)) while the sensitivity of Gram-positive bacteria was highly variable and that of yeast was intermediary (0.01% (w/v)). To achieve the second aim, the media, with one of these components added, were inoculated with Candida lambica (±2 log cfu/ml) and were incubated at 7 °C until the yeast reached the stationary phase. Starch, whey proteins and NaCl had a negative effect on the antimicrobial activity. Oil conversely had no influence. For the third aim, the chitosan coating was formed by dipping the products in a chitosan-lactic acid/Na-lactate solution from which the pH was adjusted to the pH of the products. These products were equilibrium modified atmosphere (EMA)-packaged, stored at 7 °C and during storage sensorially and microbiologically evaluated. A chitosan coating on strawberries was applicable while on mixed lettuce the chitosan coating was not applicable due to the development of a bitter taste. The microbiological load on the chitosan-dipped samples was lower for both products. The antimicrobial effect of chitosan on lettuce disappeared after 4 days of storage, while it maintained on the strawberries during 12 days.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.fm.2004.02.008

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Devlieghere, F., Vermeulen, A., & Debevere, J.
Affiliations
Ghent University (BE)
Corresponding author
Devlieghere, F
Venue
Food Microbiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-12
Volume
21
Issue
6
Pages
703-714
ISSN
0740-0020 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2121822945
Cited by
908
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 41 · 2023: 44 · 2022: 44 · 2021: 63 · 2020: 64 · 2019: 60 · 2018: 55 · 2017: 48 · 2016: 64 · 2015: 48 · 2014: 53 · 2013: 49 · 2012: 52
FWCI
7.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Food Microbiology (publishedVersion)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Nanocomposite Films for Food Packaging
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Antimicrobial agents and applications
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Postharvest Quality and Shelf Life Management
Keywords
chitosan, antimicrobial activity, spoilage microorganisms, foodborne pathogens, psychrotrophic bacteria, starch, whey protein, sodium chloride, edible coatings, minimally processed fruits and vegetables, strawberry, lettuce, lactic acid, sodium lactate, modified atmosphere packaging, postharvest decay

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review