Chitosan: antimicrobial activity, interactions with food components, and applicability as a coating on fruit and vegetables
Abstract
Chitosan has recently gained more interest due to its applications in food and pharmaceutics. Among others, the antimicrobial activity of chitosan has been pointed out as one of its most interesting properties of chitosan. The aim of this study was threefold: (1) the quantification of the antimicrobial effect of chitosan with a deacetylation degree of 94% and a molecular weight of 43 kDa on different psychrotrophic spoilage organisms and food pathogens. (2) The determination of the influence of different food components (starch, whey protein, NaCl and oil) on the antimicrobial effect of chitosan and (3) the investigation of the effects of chitosan coatings on controlling decay of minimally processed fruits and vegetables (strawberry and lettuce). For the first aim several bacteria and yeast were exposed to chitosan concentrations varying from 40 to 750 mg/l. Generally, Gram-negative bacteria seemed to be very sensitive for the applied chitosan (MIC < or = 0.006% (w/v)) while the sensitivity of Gram-positive bacteria was highly variable and that of yeast was intermediary (0.01% (w/v)). To achieve the second aim, the media, with one of these components added, were inoculated with Candida lambica (±2 log cfu/ml) and were incubated at 7 °C until the yeast reached the stationary phase. Starch, whey proteins and NaCl had a negative effect on the antimicrobial activity. Oil conversely had no influence. For the third aim, the chitosan coating was formed by dipping the products in a chitosan-lactic acid/Na-lactate solution from which the pH was adjusted to the pH of the products. These products were equilibrium modified atmosphere (EMA)-packaged, stored at 7 °C and during storage sensorially and microbiologically evaluated. A chitosan coating on strawberries was applicable while on mixed lettuce the chitosan coating was not applicable due to the development of a bitter taste. The microbiological load on the chitosan-dipped samples was lower for both products. The antimicrobial effect of chitosan on lettuce disappeared after 4 days of storage, while it maintained on the strawberries during 12 days.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In trials on strawberries, chitosan treatments did not affect taste of fruit after application, except very soon after application, when a slightly bitter taste was perceived.
“In trials run on strawberries, chitosan treatments did not affect the taste of the fruit after application, except very soon after application, when a slightly bitter taste was perceived (Devlieghere et al., 2004).”
From GRAS, plant- and animal-derived compounds as alternatives to conventional fungicides for the control of postharvest diseases of fresh horticultural produce (2016) · cites this paper as Devlieghere et al., 2004
In most studies, overall fruit quality was not negatively affected by chitosan application.
“In general, in most of the studies, overall fruit quality was not negatively affected by chitosan application (El Ghaouth et al., 1991; Devlieghere et al., 2004; Feliziani et al., 2015).”
From GRAS, plant- and animal-derived compounds as alternatives to conventional fungicides for the control of postharvest diseases of fresh horticultural produce (2016) · cites this paper as Devlieghere et al., 2004
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Gutierrez, J., Barry-Ryan, C., & Bourke, P. (2008) · International Journal of Food Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2008.02.028 · Cited by 925 · see citing works
Application of natural antimicrobials for food preservation
Tiwari, B. K., Valdramidis, V. P., O’ Donnell, C. P., Muthukumarappan, K., Bourke, P., & Cullen, P. J. (2009) · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jf900668n · Cited by 851 · see citing works
Asgher, M., Qamar, S. A., Bilal, M., & Iqbal, H. M. N. (2020) · Food Research International · doi:10.1016/j.foodres.2020.109625 · Cited by 721 · see citing works
Palou, L., Ali, A., Fallik, E., & Romanazzi, G. (2016) · Postharvest Biology and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.postharvbio.2016.04.017 · Cited by 286 · see citing works
Antimicrobial films for food applications: a quantitative analysis of their effectiveness
Joerger, R. D. (2007) · Packaging Technology and Science · doi:10.1002/pts.774 · Cited by 237 · see citing works
Chitosan Based Materials in Cosmetic Applications: A Review
Kulka, K., & Sionkowska, A. (2023) · Molecules · doi:10.3390/molecules28041817 · Cited by 157 · see citing works
Cosmetic Packaging to Save the Environment: Future Perspectives
Cinelli, P., Coltelli, M., Signori, F., Morganti, P., & Lazzeri, A. (2019) · Cosmetics · doi:10.3390/cosmetics6020026 · Cited by 128 · see citing works
Tawfik, S. M. (2015) · Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.jiec.2015.02.011 · Cited by 95 · see citing works
- Authors
- Devlieghere, F., Vermeulen, A., & Debevere, J.
- Affiliations
- Ghent University (BE)
- Corresponding author
- Devlieghere, F
- Venue
- Food Microbiology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2004-12
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 703-714
- ISSN
- 0740-0020 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2121822945
- Cited by
- 908
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 41 · 2023: 44 · 2022: 44 · 2021: 63 · 2020: 64 · 2019: 60 · 2018: 55 · 2017: 48 · 2016: 64 · 2015: 48 · 2014: 53 · 2013: 49 · 2012: 52
- FWCI
- 7.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Food Microbiology (publishedVersion)
- Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Nanocomposite Films for Food Packaging
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Antimicrobial agents and applications
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Postharvest Quality and Shelf Life Management
- Keywords
- chitosan, antimicrobial activity, spoilage microorganisms, foodborne pathogens, psychrotrophic bacteria, starch, whey protein, sodium chloride, edible coatings, minimally processed fruits and vegetables, strawberry, lettuce, lactic acid, sodium lactate, modified atmosphere packaging, postharvest decay
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review