Design of hospital healing gardens linked to pre- or post-occupancy research findings
Open accessAbstract
This work examined the evidence-based design (EBD) and post-occupancy research of hospital healing gardens. The lack of statutory design guidelines raises concerns on how such gardens are created and whether they meet the intended design purpose. This issue is particularly important for hospitals because a neutral or even a negative effect on users can be generated. A systematic analysis of the literature in two databases (Scopus and Web of Science) was undertaken. Results showed that pre- and post-occupancy research findings on hospital healing garden design are sparse and design recommendations vary among users. Despite the lack of research on the design of healing gardens, the review showed that while post-occupancy research findings evaluate the effectiveness of design recommendations, pre-occupancy research findings, combined with site analysis, constitute a traditional approach followed in landscape architecture practice and determine the site and user features that must be addressed for each hospital. Pre- and post-research findings must be considered in the design process to create a “successful” healing garden. A summary of EBD recommendations for different users is presented, and the need to enrich the existing amount of EBD recommendations is highlighted.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Gaia meets Asclepius: Creating healthy places
Sullivan, W. C., Frumkin, H., Jackson, R. J., & Chang, C.-Y. (2014) · Landscape and Urban Planning · doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.03.005 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Paraskevopoulou, A. T., & Kamperi, E.
- Affiliations
- Agricultural University of Athens (GR)
- Corresponding author
- Paraskevopoulou, Angeliki Triandafillou
- Venue
- Frontiers of Architectural Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-09
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 395-414
- ISSN
- 2095-2635 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2889995964
- Cited by
- 48
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 5 · 2019: 3
- FWCI
- 6.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Update notices
- erratum (2021-03-01)
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Frontiers of Architectural Research (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Research Projects For Excellence IKY/SIEMENS
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Urban Studies › Healthcare Facilities Design and Sustainability
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Urban Green Space and Health
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Facilities and Workplace Management
- Keywords
- evidence-based design, post-occupancy evaluation, hospital landscape design, design guidelines, site analysis, user experience, therapeutic landscapes
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review