Cited by 48Healthcare Facilities Design and SustainabilityUrban Green Space and HealthFacilities and Workplace Management

Design of hospital healing gardens linked to pre- or post-occupancy research findings

Open access
Paraskevopoulou, Angeliki Triandafillou, Kamperi, Emmanouela·2018·Frontiers of Architectural Research

Abstract

This work examined the evidence-based design (EBD) and post-occupancy research of hospital healing gardens. The lack of statutory design guidelines raises concerns on how such gardens are created and whether they meet the intended design purpose. This issue is particularly important for hospitals because a neutral or even a negative effect on users can be generated. A systematic analysis of the literature in two databases (Scopus and Web of Science) was undertaken. Results showed that pre- and post-occupancy research findings on hospital healing garden design are sparse and design recommendations vary among users. Despite the lack of research on the design of healing gardens, the review showed that while post-occupancy research findings evaluate the effectiveness of design recommendations, pre-occupancy research findings, combined with site analysis, constitute a traditional approach followed in landscape architecture practice and determine the site and user features that must be addressed for each hospital. Pre- and post-research findings must be considered in the design process to create a “successful” healing garden. A summary of EBD recommendations for different users is presented, and the need to enrich the existing amount of EBD recommendations is highlighted.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.foar.2018.05.004

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Paraskevopoulou, A. T., & Kamperi, E.
Affiliations
Agricultural University of Athens (GR)
Corresponding author
Paraskevopoulou, Angeliki Triandafillou
Venue
Frontiers of Architectural Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-09
Volume
7
Issue
3
Pages
395-414
ISSN
2095-2635 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2889995964
Cited by
48
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 5 · 2019: 3
FWCI
6.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Update notices
erratum (2021-03-01)
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers of Architectural Research (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Research Projects For Excellence IKY/SIEMENS
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Urban Studies › Healthcare Facilities Design and Sustainability
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Urban Green Space and Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Facilities and Workplace Management
Keywords
evidence-based design, post-occupancy evaluation, hospital landscape design, design guidelines, site analysis, user experience, therapeutic landscapes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review