The DOI matches its Crossref record; 109 of the 109 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Biophilic design in architecture and its contributions to health, well-being, and sustainability: A critical review
Open accessAbstract
In the last ten years, ‘nature’ and biophilic design have received widespread attention in architecture, especially in response to growing environmental challenges. However, open questions and controversies remain regarding conceptualizing and addressing ‘nature’ in practice and research. This study conducts a literature review to discuss biophilic design as a theoretical framework to interpret ‘nature’ in architecture. The following questions are answered: (1) How has the concept of biophilic design emerged, and how can it be defined? (2) In what ways can biophilic design contribute to the goals of sustainable architecture? (3) What are the key design strategies in biophilic design? This review identifies and compares the key frameworks of biophilic design and explains their major elements. We then analyse the benefits (e.g., enhance health, well-being, productivity, biodiversity, and circularity) of biophilic design in achieving sustainability, as framed through the UN Sustainable Development Goals. The results indicate that biophilic design is more complex and richer than the mere application of vegetation in buildings; it broadens the variety through encompassing different types of nature from physical, sensory, metaphorical, morphological, material to spiritual. Moreover, knowledge gaps are identified to motivate future research and critical reflections on biophilic design practices.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The restorative benefits of nature: toward an integrative framework
Kaplan, S. (1995) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/0272-4944(95)90001-2 · Cited by 6,923
Stress recovery during exposure to natural and urban environments
Ulrich, R. S., Simons, R. F., Losito, B. D., Fiorito, E., Miles, M. A., & Zelson, M. (1991) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0272-4944(05)80184-7 · Cited by 5,990
The Adapted mind : evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture
Barkow, J. H., Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (1992) · Cited by 5,221
The cognitive benefits of interacting with nature.
Berman, M. G., Jonides, J., & Kaplan, S. (2008) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02225.x · Cited by 2,535 · cited 1×
“, 2014; Kellert, 2018) (Berman et al., 2008; Kellert, 2018; McGee and MarshallBaker, 2015; Ulrich, 1981; Vaughan and Ostwald, 2010; Yin et al., 2020) (Browning et al.”
PLACE ATTACHMENT: CONCEPTUAL AND EMPIRICAL QUESTIONS
HIDALGO, M. C., & HERNÁNDEZ, B. (2001) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1006/jevp.2001.0221 · Cited by 2,412
Aesthetic and affective response to natural environment
Ulrich, R. S. (1983) · Behavior and the Natural Environment · doi:10.1007/978-1-4613-3539-9_4 · Cited by 2,241
McHarg, I. L. (1969) · Cited by 1,868
Adaptive thermal comfort and sustainable thermal standards for buildings
Nicol, J. F., & Humphreys, M. A. (2002) · Energy and Buildings · doi:10.1016/s0378-7788(02)00006-3 · Cited by 1,850
Barton, J., & Pretty, J. (2010) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es903183r · Cited by 1,592
Psychological benefits of greenspace increase with biodiversity.
Fuller, R. A., Irvine, K. N., Devine-Wright, P., Warren, P. H., & Gaston, K. J. (2007) · Biology Letters · doi:10.1098/rsbl.2007.0149 · Cited by 1,549
Cited by
Strategic biophilic residential design based on seniors’ health profiles: a HRQoL-driven approach
Lee, E.-J., & Park, S.-J. (2025) · Buildings · doi:10.3390/buildings15111792 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhong, W., Schröder, T., & Bekkering, J.
- Venue
- Frontiers of Architectural Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2022-02
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 114-141
- ISSN
- 2095-2635 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3198874703
- Cited by
- 444
- References
- 109
- FWCI
- 17.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Biophilic design in architecture and its contributions to health, well-being, and sustainability: A critical review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.foar.2021.07.006
- The paper
- Zhong, W., Schröder, T., & Bekkering, J. (2022). Biophilic design in architecture and its contributions to health, well-being, and sustainability: A critical review. Frontiers of Architectural Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2021.07.006
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.