Chlorogenic acid and caffeine contents in various commercial brewed coffees
Abstract
Twelve commercial brewed coffees (seven regular and five decaffeinated) were analyzed for chlorogenic acids (CGA) and caffeine by HPLC. Their pH and UV-Vis absorbances were also measured. The CGAs identified were three caffeolylquinic acids (3-CQA, 4-CQA, and 5-CQA), three feruloylquinic acids (3-FQA, 4-FQA, and 5-FQA), and three dicaffeoylquinic acids (3,4-diCQA, 3,5-diCQA, and 4,5-diCQA). The total CGAs ranged from 5.26 mg/g to 17.1 mg/g in regular coffees and from 2.10 mg/g to 16.1 mg/g in decaffeinated coffees. Among CGA, 5-CQA was present at the highest level, ranging from 2.13 mg/g to 7.06 mg/g coffee, and comprising 36-42% and 37-39% of the total CGA in the regular and decaffeinated coffees, respectively. CGA isomer contents were, in decreasing order, 5-CQA > 4-CQA > 3-CQA > 5-FQA > 4-FQA > 3-FQA > 3,4-diCQA > 4,5-diCQA, 3,5-diCQA. The caffeine content in regular and decaffeinated coffees ranged from 10.9 mg/g to 16.5 mg/g and from 0.34 mg/g to 0.47 mg/g, respectively. The pH of regular and decaffeinated coffees ranged from 4.95 to 5.99 and from 5.14 to 5.80, respectively. The relationship between the pH and the UV-Vis absorbance at 325 nm was moderately correlated (R2 = 0.7829, p < 0.001, n = 12).
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Of the three CQA isomers analyzed, 5-CQA had the highest concentration in all hot brew samples.
“Of the three CQA isomers analyzed, 5-CQA was found to have the highest concentration in all samples, in agreement with previous studies33–39.”
From Acidity and Antioxidant Activity of Cold Brew Coffee (2018) · cites this paper as [37]
The roasting time and temperature influence the chlorogenic-acid content in coffee products.
“suggesting that the roasting time and temperature influence the chlorogenic-acid content in coffee products [21,22].”
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 12 · Cited by 258
- Authors
- Fujioka, K., & Shibamoto, T.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Davis (US)
- Corresponding author
- Shibamoto, T.
- Venue
- Food Chemistry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2008-01
- Volume
- 106
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 217-221
- ISSN
- 0308-8146 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2005956027
- Cited by
- 258
- References
- 12
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 4.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Food Chemistry (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Coffee research and impacts
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food and Agricultural Sciences
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Biochemistry › Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities
- Keywords
- chlorogenic acid, caffeine, brewed coffee, decaffeinated coffee, feruloylquinic acids, dicaffeoylquinic acids, UV-Vis absorbance
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review