Assessment of in vitro antioxidant capacity and polyphenolic composition of selected medicinal herbs from Leguminosae family in Peninsular Malaysia
Abstract
Determination of total phenolic (TPC), flavonoid and anthocyanin contents, and various antioxidant activities (2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl radical scavenging, ferric reducing power, ferrous ion chelating and lipid peroxidation inhibition) of leaves and flowers of Bauhinia kockiana, Caesalpinia pulcherrima and Cassia surattensis were performed in this study. The B. kockiana flower was found to possess the highest TPC (8280±498mgGAE/100g), free radical scavenging activity (ascorbic acid equivalents 14,600±2360mgAA/100g) and reducing ability (72.4±8.7mgGAE/g). Rutin and chlorogenic acid were detected in the plants, where the C. pulcherrima leaf contained the highest amount of rutin (669±26mg/100g), while minute amounts of chlorogenic acid were detected in C. surattensis leaf (9.13±0.44mg/100g). The C. pulcherrima leaf displayed the highest ferrous ion chelating and lipid peroxidation inhibition activities. Positive correlation was observed between TPC and various antioxidant activities.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
An earlier report showed high anthocyanins content in B. kockiana flowers.
“Our earlier report [4] showed the presence of high anthocyanins content in B. kockiana flowers.”
A previous study showed that rutin was present in C. surattensis flowers and leaves extracts at 13.3 mg rutin equivalent/100 g and 29.6 mg rutin equivalent/100 g, respectively.
“Our previous study [4] has shown that rutin was present in C. surattensis flowers and leaves extracts (13.3 mg rutin equivalent/100 g and 29.6 mg rutin equivalent/100 g, respectively), assessed using aluminium chloride method.”
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 31 · Cited by 275
- Authors
- Chew, Y.-L., Goh, J.-K., & Lim, Y.-Y.
- Affiliations
- Monash University Malaysia (MY)
- Corresponding author
- Lim, Yau-Yan
- ORCID
- Chew, Yik-Ling
- Venue
- Food Chemistry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2009-09
- Volume
- 116
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 13-18
- ISSN
- 0308-8146 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2035917603
- Cited by
- 275
- References
- 31
- Citations by year
- 2026: 14 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 6.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Food Chemistry (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Monash University
- Monash University Malaysia
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Biochemistry › Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Medicinal Plant Research
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Phytochemistry and Biological Activities
- Keywords
- antioxidant capacity, polyphenols, medicinal plants, Fabaceae, Caesalpinia pulcherrima, total phenolic content, flavonoids, anthocyanins, DPPH radical scavenging, reducing power, ferrous ion chelation, lipid peroxidation inhibition, rutin, chlorogenic acid, leaves and flowers, Peninsular Malaysia
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review