Quinoa Intake Reduces Plasma and Liver Cholesterol, Lessens Obesity-Associated Inflammation, and Helps to Prevent Hepatic Steatosis in Obese Db/Db Mouse
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to investigate if quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.), a good source of nutrients, fibre, and phytochemicals, can modulate risk disease biomarkers on obese-diabetic (db/db) mice. The db/db mice fed quinoa-supplemented (quinoa) or AIN-93G diet (obese) were compared to lean control fed AIN-93G diet. Quinoa intake reduced at significant level plasma total-cholesterol (total-c), LDL-c, and oxidized-LDL to levels similar to lean; lessened protein carbonyls and interleukin (IL)-6. The hepatic steatosis and total-c accumulation in liver were also similar between lean and quinoa and lower than obese. Quinoa fibre and phytochemicals may have contributed to these health benefits. However, quinoa intake increased plasma insulin and did not protect from other pathophysiological manifestations of the db/db research model. More studies are needed with other research models and quinoa doses achievable by human diet to validate the clinical relevance of this study.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The introduction of FFIs into the diet had a positive effect on the body weight of animals up to the 25th day of the experiment, despite the hypolipidemic properties of quinoa.
“In the present study, the average cumulative feed intake in stressed animals of the IMM and IMM-FFI groups did not differ and was also lower compared with the CTRL group; however, the introduction of FFIs into the diet had a positive effect on the body weight of animals up to the 25th day of the experiment, despite the hypolipidemic properties of quinoa [12,13,14].”
From Anxiolytic and Antioxidant Effect of Phytoecdysteroids and Polyphenols from Chenopodium quinoa on an In Vivo Restraint Stress Model (2022) · cites this paper as [14]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 41 · Cited by 110
- Authors
- Noratto, G. D., Murphy, K., & Chew, B. P.
- Affiliations
- Washington State University (US)
- Texas A&M University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Noratto, Giuliana D.
- Venue
- Food Chemistry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-07
- Volume
- 287
- Pages
- 107-114
- ISSN
- 0308-8146 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2917781950
- Cited by
- 110
- References
- 41
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 6
- FWCI
- 11.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Food Chemistry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Forskningsrådet om Hälsa, Arbetsliv och Välfärd
- Soochow University
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Seed and Plant Biochemistry
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Natural Antidiabetic Agents Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diet, Metabolism, and Disease
- Keywords
- quinoa, obesity, type 2 diabetes, db/db mice, hepatic steatosis, serum cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, oxidized LDL, liver cholesterol, inflammation, interleukin-6, protein carbonyls, dietary fiber, phytochemicals, insulin
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Cholesterol, Diet, Fatty Liver, Inflammation, Mice, Obese, Obesity, Seeds, Chenopodium quinoa, Mice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review