The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A review of Listeria monocytogenes: An update on outbreaks, virulence, dose-response, ecology, and risk assessments
Open accessAbstract
Improved control measures starting in the 1990s have greatly reduced the prevalence of L. monocytogenes in many food categories, particularly in meats and meat products. However, the rate of listeriosis has remained constant during the last decade and the more severe, systemic (invasive) form of listeriosis is now recognized as occurring more frequently in small outbreaks than previously recognized. This review addresses the recent advances in epidemiology and virulence, in growth and modelling, and insights from the risk assessments. Recognition of recent outbreaks from food vehicles not traditionally associated with L. monocytogenes (celery, cantaloupe, mung bean sprouts, stone fruits, caramel apples and ice cream) was facilitated by PFGE and, increasingly, whole genome sequencing. The Key Events framework, an understanding of the key individual biochemical steps from ingestion to infection, provides a structure for relating new knowledge on strain variability, mutations, and host susceptibility to the probability of illness. Guidance for determination of the growth/no growth potential of a food has been issued by several regulatory authorities and the risk assessments indicate that prevention of growth remains a principle control element. The recognition of biofilm formation and the possible existence of dormant, non-dividing persister cells will require additional attention. The recent outbreaks underscored the individual characteristics of specific foods (melons vs all fruit; microenvironments in the caramel apples) and raised questions about the current understanding of infectivity of lower doses and the susceptibility of specific individuals. Advances have been made in these areas, but further research is clearly necessary to control this pathogen.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Foodborne illness acquired in the United States—Major pathogens
Scallan, E., Hoekstra, R. M., Angulo, F. J., Tauxe, R. V., Widdowson, M.-A., Roy, S. L., Jones, J. L., & Griffin, P. M. (2011) · Emerging Infectious Diseases · doi:10.3201/eid1701.p11101 · Cited by 7,657
A transgenic model for listeriosis: role of internalin in crossing the intestinal barrier
Lecuit, M., Vandormael-Pournin, S., Lefort, J., Huerre, M., Gounon, P., Dupuy, C., Babinet, C., & Cossart, P. (2001) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1059852 · Cited by 633
Cited by
Bintsis, T., & Department of International Trade, T. O. W. M. (2017) · AIMS Microbiology · doi:10.3934/microbiol.2017.3.529 · Cited by 926
The European Union One Health 2018 Zoonoses Report
European Food Safety Authority and European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (EFSA and ECDC) (2019) · EFSA Journal · doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5926 · Cited by 874
The European Union One Health 2021 Zoonoses Report
Authority, E. F. S., & European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (2022) · EFSA Journal · doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7666 · Cited by 703
Animals as sources of food-borne pathogens: a review
Heredia, N., & García, S. (2018) · Animal Nutrition · doi:10.1016/j.aninu.2018.04.006 · Cited by 554
Metadata
- Authors
- Buchanan, R. L., Gorris, L. G. M., Hayman, M. M., Jackson, T. C., & Whiting, R. C.
- Venue
- Food Control
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-05
- Volume
- 75
- Pages
- 1-13
- ISSN
- 0956-7135 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2564762764
- Cited by
- 818
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 52.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A review of Listeria monocytogenes: An update on outbreaks, virulence, dose-response, ecology, and risk assessments. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.foodcont.2016.12.016
- The paper
- Buchanan, R. L., Gorris, L. G. M., Hayman, M. M., Jackson, T. C., & Whiting, R. C. (2017). A review of Listeria monocytogenes: An update on outbreaks, virulence, dose-response, ecology, and risk assessments. Food Control. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2016.12.016
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.