Where are the best opportunities for reducing greenhouse gas emissions in the food system (including the food chain)? A comment
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Using food waste as animal feed can effectively reduce the total amount of food waste and significantly reduce carbon emissions associated with food waste disposal in traditional landfills.
“For example, using food waste as animal feed can effectively reduce the total amount of food waste (Georganas et al. 2020) and significantly reduce the carbon emissions associated with food waste disposal in traditional landfills (Dorward 2012;Lee et al. 2017).”
From Recycling municipal, agricultural and industrial waste into energy, fertilizers, food and construction materials, and economic feasibility: a review (2023) · cites this paper as Dorward 2012
Lost food has important implications for public health, natural resource use, and resiliency in the face of climate change.
“Lost food has important implications for public health, natural resource use, and resiliency in the face of climate change (Cuellar and Webber, 2010;Dorward, 2012;Lewison et al., 2011;Parfitt et al., 2010), and the issue is gaining traction among a wide range of stakeholders.”
From Wasted seafood in the United States: Quantifying loss from production to consumption and moving toward solutions (2015) · cites this paper as Dorward, 2012
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 23 · Cited by 99
- Authors
- Dorward, L. J.
- Corresponding author
- Dorward, Leejiah J.
- ORCID
- Dorward, Leejiah J.
- Venue
- Food Policy
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-08
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 463-466
- ISSN
- 0306-9192 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1975023892
- Cited by
- 99
- References
- 23
- Citations by year
- 2025: 8 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 4.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Food Policy (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Environmental Impact and Sustainability
- Keywords
- food waste, greenhouse gas emissions, food systems, food chain, pre-consumer waste, consumer waste, embodied emissions, food waste policy, behavior change, technological change
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
