The food retail revolution in China and its association with diet and health
Open accessAbstract
The processed food sector in low- and middle-income countries has grown rapidly. Little is understood about its effect on obesity. Using data from 14,976 participants aged two and older in the 2011 China Health and Nutrition Survey, this paper examines patterns of processed food consumption and their impacts on obesity while considering the endogeneity of those who purchase processed foods. A major assumption of our analysis of the impact of processed foods on overweight and obesity was that the consumption of processed foods is endogenous due to their accessibility and urbanicity levels. The results show that 74.5% of participants consumed processed foods, excluding edible oils and other condiments; 28.5% of participants' total daily energy intake (EI) was from processed foods. Children and teenagers in megacities had the highest proportion of EI (40.2%) from processed foods. People who lived in megacities or highly urbanized neighborhoods with higher incomes and educational achievement consumed more processed foods. When controlling for endogeneity, only the body mass index (BMI) and risk of being overweight of children ages two to eighteen are adversely associated with processed foods (+4.97 BMI units, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.66-8.28; odds ratio (OR) = 3.63, 95% CI: 1.45-9.13). Processed food purchases represent less than a third of current Chinese food purchases. However, processed food purchases are growing at the rate of 50% per year, and we must begin to understand the implications for the future.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The proportion for China is 28.5% and rising rapidly.
“The proportion for China is 28.5% and rising rapidly (36,82,83).”
From Food Consumption and its Impact on Cardiovascular Disease: Importance of Solutions Focused on the Globalized Food System (2015) · cites this paper as [82]
This process is accelerating across all LMIC markets.
“This process is accelerating across all LMIC markets (13,82,83).”
From Food Consumption and its Impact on Cardiovascular Disease: Importance of Solutions Focused on the Globalized Food System (2015) · cites this paper as [82]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 62 · Cited by 102
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Garnett T Wilkes Andreas Network FCR Appetite for change: Social, economic and environmental transformations in China's food system 2014 Oxford University, Oxford Martin School
- Authors
- Zhou, Y., Du, S., Su, C., Zhang, B., Wang, H., & Popkin, B. M.
- Affiliations
- Jiangsu Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CN)
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
- Chinese Center For Disease Control and Prevention (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Popkin, Barry M.
- Venue
- Food Policy
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-08
- Volume
- 55
- Pages
- 92-100
- ISSN
- 0306-9192 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC4513366
- OpenAlex
- W823825824
- Cited by
- 102
- References
- 62
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 4
- FWCI
- 10.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Food Policy (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Carolina Digital Repository (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) (submittedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- UNC Libraries
- Funders
- Fogarty International Center, NIH (5 D43 TW009077)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economics of Agriculture and Food Markets
- Keywords
- processed food consumption, obesity, overweight, food retail, food environment, urbanization, megacities, children and adolescents, body mass index, endogeneity, China, diet and health
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review