Cited by 343Food Waste Reduction and SustainabilityOrganic Food and AgricultureConsumer behavior in food and health

This apple is too ugly for me!

Open access
de Hooge, Ilona E., Oostindjer, Marije, Aschemann-Witzel, Jessica, Normann, Anne, Loose, Simone Mueller, Almli, Valérie Lengard·2017·Food Quality and Preference

Abstract

Food waste has received increasing scientific and societal attention during the last decade. One important cause of food waste is thought to be the un-willingness of supply chains and consumers to sell, purchase, and consume suboptimal or imperfect foods. Yet, empirical research on this issue is scarce and contradictory. The current research investigates under which conditions consumers purchase or consume foods that deviate from regular products in terms of appearance standards, date labelling, or damaged packaging, without deviation on the intrinsic quality or safety. An online choice experiment among 4214 consumers from five Northern European countries reveals that consumer preferences for suboptimal products differ depending on whether the consumer is in a supermarket or at home, and depending on the type of sub-optimality. Moreover, consumer choices, discount preferences, and waste behaviors of suboptimal products are influenced by demographics (nationality, age), by personality characteristics (value orientation, commitment to environmental sustainability, and perceived consumer effectiveness in saving the environment), and by individual-waste aspects (perceived food waste of the household, perceived importance of food waste, engaging in shopping/cooking). These findings provide important insights into consumer preferences for suboptimal products, and useful suggestions for supply-chain regulations on suboptimal products.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.foodqual.2016.09.012

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 47 · Cited by 343

Authors
de Hooge, I. E., Oostindjer, M., Aschemann-Witzel, J., Normann, A., Loose, S. M., & Almli, V. L.
Affiliations
  • Norwegian University of Life Sciences (NO)
  • University of South Australia (AU)
  • Nofima (NO)
Venue
Food Quality and Preference
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-03
Volume
56
Pages
80-92
ISSN
0950-3293 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2524993213
Cited by
343
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 32 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 44 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 48 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 38 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 11
FWCI
31.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Food Quality and Preference (publishedVersion)
  • Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (acceptedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Federal Office for Agriculture and Food (2814ERA02B)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Organic Food and Agriculture
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Consumer behavior in food and health
Keywords
food waste, appearance standards, consumer preferences, purchase behavior, personality traits, supply chain regulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-07.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review