Cited by 23Probiotics and Fermented FoodsInfant Nutrition and HealthMicrobial Metabolites in Food Biotechnology

Fermented or unfermented milk using Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis HN019: Technological approach determines the probiotic modulation of mucosal cellular immunity

Open access
Bogsan, C.S.B., Ferreira, L., Maldonado, C., Perdigon, G., Almeida, S.R., Oliveira, M.N.·2014·Food Research International

Abstract

Functional foods are important sources of probiotic delivery, mainly by fermented milk products. The physiological benefits attributed to bifido bacteria are their abilities to interfere with the adhesion of pathogenic species to surfaces of intestinal cells, and to enhance the host's immune function through their metabolic activities. However, the effects of a technological approach - fermentation or addition of probiotic in milk, and its efficacy in health are rarely taken into consideration. Hence, fermented or unfermented milk using Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis HN019 were administered to BALB/c mice for 14days. After that, the architecture of the gut was histologically investigated, and the related immune cells were examined by flow cytometry and immunofluorescence. Increase in mucus and cellularity production, changes in immune pattern and preservation of mucosal epithelia in health BALB/c mice were observed only in the fermented milk group. This suggested that changes in functionality of bifidobacteria and/or the metabolites produced by the fermentation process are the keys to improving beneficial effects in the host of the gut mucosa.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.foodres.2014.05.036

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • It has been demonstrated, in vivo, that B. animalis subsp. lactis HN019 changes its effect on the (mice) host when the strain is given in a fermented dairy format in comparison with the unfermented milk.

    “In this regard, it has been demonstrated, in vivo, that B. animalis subsp. lactis HN019 changes its effect on the (mice) host when the strain is given in a fermented dairy format in comparison with the unfermented milk (89).”

    From Bifidobacteria and Their Health-Promoting Effects (2017) · cites this paper as [89]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 32 · Cited by 23

Authors
Bogsan, C. S. B., Ferreira, L., Maldonado, C., Perdigon, G., Almeida, S. R., & Oliveira, M. N.
Affiliations
  • Universidade de São Paulo (BR)
  • Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (AR)
Venue
Food Research International
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-10
Volume
64
Pages
283-288
ISSN
0963-9969 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2089488330
Cited by
23
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3
FWCI
3.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Food Research International (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • CONICET Digital (CONICET) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
Funders
  • FAPESP N. 2008/10167-1 (N. 2008/10167-1)
  • CNPq 470951/2010-9 (470951/2010-9)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Infant Nutrition and Health
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Microbial Metabolites in Food Biotechnology
Keywords
fermented milk, probiotics, mucosal immunity, intestinal mucosa, intestinal epithelium, mucus production, probiotic fermentation, functional foods, BALB/c mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review