Fermented or unfermented milk using Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis HN019: Technological approach determines the probiotic modulation of mucosal cellular immunity
Open accessAbstract
Functional foods are important sources of probiotic delivery, mainly by fermented milk products. The physiological benefits attributed to bifido bacteria are their abilities to interfere with the adhesion of pathogenic species to surfaces of intestinal cells, and to enhance the host's immune function through their metabolic activities. However, the effects of a technological approach - fermentation or addition of probiotic in milk, and its efficacy in health are rarely taken into consideration. Hence, fermented or unfermented milk using Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis HN019 were administered to BALB/c mice for 14days. After that, the architecture of the gut was histologically investigated, and the related immune cells were examined by flow cytometry and immunofluorescence. Increase in mucus and cellularity production, changes in immune pattern and preservation of mucosal epithelia in health BALB/c mice were observed only in the fermented milk group. This suggested that changes in functionality of bifidobacteria and/or the metabolites produced by the fermentation process are the keys to improving beneficial effects in the host of the gut mucosa.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
It has been demonstrated, in vivo, that B. animalis subsp. lactis HN019 changes its effect on the (mice) host when the strain is given in a fermented dairy format in comparison with the unfermented milk.
“In this regard, it has been demonstrated, in vivo, that B. animalis subsp. lactis HN019 changes its effect on the (mice) host when the strain is given in a fermented dairy format in comparison with the unfermented milk (89).”
From Bifidobacteria and Their Health-Promoting Effects (2017) · cites this paper as [89]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 32 · Cited by 23
- Authors
- Bogsan, C. S. B., Ferreira, L., Maldonado, C., Perdigon, G., Almeida, S. R., & Oliveira, M. N.
- Affiliations
- Universidade de São Paulo (BR)
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (AR)
- Venue
- Food Research International
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-10
- Volume
- 64
- Pages
- 283-288
- ISSN
- 0963-9969 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2089488330
- Cited by
- 23
- References
- 32
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3
- FWCI
- 3.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-sa
- www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
- Locations
- Food Research International (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- CONICET Digital (CONICET) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- Funders
- FAPESP N. 2008/10167-1 (N. 2008/10167-1)
- CNPq 470951/2010-9 (470951/2010-9)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Infant Nutrition and Health
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Microbial Metabolites in Food Biotechnology
- Keywords
- fermented milk, probiotics, mucosal immunity, intestinal mucosa, intestinal epithelium, mucus production, probiotic fermentation, functional foods, BALB/c mice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review