Cited by 72Plant Growth and Agriculture TechniquesComposting and Vermicomposting TechniquesAgriculture, Plant Science, Crop Management

Revalorization of spent coffee residues by a direct agronomic approach

Cruz, Rebeca, Mendes, Eulália, Torrinha, Álvaro, Morais, Simone, Pereira, José Alberto, Baptista, Paula, Casal, Susana·2015·Food Research International

Abstract

Spent coffee grounds (SCG) represent a high-volume food waste worldwide, and several reuse approaches have been attempted. Herein, a greenhouse field experiment was carried out by cultivating Batavia lettuce with 5%, 10%, 15%, 20% and 30% (v/v) espresso SCG directly composted in the soil. Healthy vegetables were obtained for all treatments, without yield loss for up to 10% SCG. A progressive increment of green color intensity with increasing SCG content was observed, corroborated by the increase of their photosynthetic pigments (chlorophylls and carotenoids). Furthermore, total ascorbic acid and tocopherols showed statistical significant increases (p<0.001) between control and all tested groups. Marked variations of nutritionally relevant minerals, particularly potassium, phosphorous and sodium were also revealed at higher percentage treatments (20% and 30%). This approach constitutes a clean, direct, simple and cost-effective measure to produce value-added vegetables, while reducing food waste disposal.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.foodres.2014.11.018

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Composting SCG (including vermicomposting) reduces SCG inhibitory effects on other plants, including lettuce, attributed to limitation of microbial activity, chelating of caffeine and other toxins, neutralizing pH, and reduction in C:N ratios.

    “Previous studies have shown that composting SCG (including vermicomposting) similarly reduced SCG inhibitory effects on other plants, including lettuce.This has been attributed to the limitation of microbial activity, the chelating of caffeine and other toxins, neutralizing pH, and a reduction in C:N ratios [27,28,31,55,56].”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cruz, R., Mendes, E., Torrinha, Á., Morais, S., Pereira, J. A., Baptista, P., & Casal, S.
Affiliations
  • Universidade do Porto (PT)
  • Rede de Química e Tecnologia (PT)
  • Universidade Politécnica de Bragança (PT)
Corresponding author
Casal, Susana
Venue
Food Research International
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-07
Volume
73
Pages
190-196
ISSN
0963-9969 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2051939655
Cited by
72
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1
FWCI
7.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Food Research International (publishedVersion)
  • Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • FCT (Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia) (FCT/PTDC/AGR-AAM/102447/2008)
  • FEDER (PEst-C/EQB/LA0006/2013)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Plant Growth and Agriculture Techniques
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Composting and Vermicomposting Techniques
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Agriculture, Plant Science, Crop Management
Keywords
spent coffee grounds, Batavia lettuce, food waste valorization, soil amendment, photosynthetic pigments, chlorophyll, carotenoids, vitamin C, tocopherols, mineral content, lettuce yield

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review