Cited by 53Gastrointestinal motility and disordersGut microbiota and healthProbiotics and Fermented Foods

Spore-forming Bacillus coagulans SNZ 1969 improved intestinal motility and constipation perception mediated by microbial alterations in healthy adults with mild intermittent constipation: A randomized controlled trial

Kang, Seunghee, Park, Min Young, Brooks, Isabel, Lee, Jaekyung, Kim, Su Hwan, Kim, Ji Yeon, Oh, Bumjo, Kim, Ji Won +1 more·2021·Food Research International

Abstract

The spore-forming Bacillus coagulans has attracted attention for their therapeutic action in the colon. However, the mechanism of this action remains unclear. In this study, healthy subjects with mild intermittent constipation were supplemented with B. coagulans SNZ 1969 (BC) or the placebo for 8 weeks (n = 80). Then, we assessed colonic transit time (CTT), weekly complete spontaneous bowel movement (CSBM) scores, bowel discomfort symptom (BDS) scores, and 16S rRNA fecal microbiome profiles. The association between the critically altered gut microbiome and clinical outcomes was analyzed using redundancy analysis (RDA) and validated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. BC supplementation significantly improved CTT (p = 0.031), CSBM at weeks 2 (p = 0.045) and 9 (p = 0.038), and BDS at weeks 3 (p = 0.019) and 6 (p = 0.029) compared with the placebo, while altering the community composition of the gut microbiota. We also confirmed that BC was effectively delivered to the gut. Finally, the multivariate redundancy analysis concluded that BC-induced enrichment of Lactobacillales and diminishment of Synergistales were related to CTT improvements. This study provides important new data on how spore-forming B. coagulans SNZ 1969 contributes to improving gut motility and presents evidence supporting the use of B. coagulans SNZ 1969 in adults with mild intermittent constipation and habitual low intake of fruit and vegetables.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.foodres.2021.110428

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 60 · Cited by 53

Authors
Kang, S., Park, M. Y., Brooks, I., Lee, J., Kim, S. H., Kim, J. Y., Oh, B., Kim, J. W., & Kwon, O.
Affiliations
  • Ewha Womans University (KR)
  • Seoul National University (KR)
  • Seoul National University of Science and Technology (KR)
Corresponding author
Kwon, Oran
Venue
Food Research International
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-08
Volume
146
Pages
110428
ISSN
0963-9969 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3161574870
Cited by
53
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 2
FWCI
6.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Food Research International (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Korea Ministry of Science and ICT
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
Keywords
colonic transit time, intestinal motility, gut microbiota, fecal microbiota, Lactobacillales, probiotic supplementation, stool frequency, fruit and vegetable intake
MeSH terms
Bacillus coagulans, Adult, Constipation, Gastrointestinal Motility, Humans, Perception, RNA, Ribosomal, 16S, Spores, Bacterial

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review