CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 319

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Variation in aboveground tree live biomass in a central Amazonian Forest: Effects of soil and topography

de Castilho, Carolina V., Magnusson, William E., de Araújo, R. Nazaré O., Luizão, Regina C.C., Luizão, Flávio J., Lima, Albertina P., Higuchi, Niro·2006·Forest Ecology and Management
DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2006.06.024
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.foreco.2006.06.024

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In central Amazonia, palm densities are higher on sandy soils compared with clay-rich soils.

    “In central Amazonia, palm densities are higher on sandy soils compared with clay-rich soils”

    From Pre‐contact and post‐colonial ecological legacies shape Surinamese rainforests (2024) · cites this paper as de Castilho et al., 2006

  • Within 5 km of Beng Tapu, where post-colonial cultivation practices have occurred, AGB estimates ranged between 284 and 404 Mg/ha and overlapped with AGB estimates >5 km away (274-433 Mg/ha), all values within the range of biomass estimates for Amazonian forests.

    “Within 5 km of Beng Tapu, where post-colonial cultivation practices have occurred, AGB estimates ranged between 284 and 404 Mg/ha and overlapped with AGB estimates >5 km away (274-433 Mg/ha), all values that fell within the range of biomass estimates for Amazonian forests”

    From Pre‐contact and post‐colonial ecological legacies shape Surinamese rainforests (2024) · cites this paper as de Castilho et al., 2006

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 49

  1. Becker, 1988, Water potential gradients for gaps and slopes in a Panamanian tropical moist forest's dry season, J. Trop. Ecol., 4, 173, 10.1017/S0266467400002674 · DOI
  2. Bellingham, 2000, The influence of topography on tree growth, mortality, and recruitment in a tropical Montane Forest, Biotropica, 32, 378, 10.1111/j.1744-7429.2000.tb00484.x · DOI
  3. Bravard, 1989, Geochemical differences in an oxisol-spodosol toposequence of Amazônia, Brazil Geoderma., 44, 29, 10.1016/0016-7061(89)90004-9 · DOI
  4. Brown, 1992, Aboveground biomass estimates for tropical moist forests of the Brazilian Amazon, Interciencia, 17, 8
  5. Chauvel, 1987, On the genesis of the soil mantle of the region of Manaus, central Amazonia, Brazil, Experientia, 43, 234, 10.1007/BF01945546 · DOI
  6. Chave, 2004, Error propagation and scaling for tropical forest biomass estimates, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. London B, 359, 409, 10.1098/rstb.2003.1425 · DOI
  7. Chave, 2003, Spatial and temporal variation of biomass in a tropical forest: results from a large census plot in Panama, J. Ecol., 91, 240, 10.1046/j.1365-2745.2003.00757.x · DOI
  8. Chave, 2001, Estimation of biomass in a neotropical forest of French Guiana: spatial and temporal variability, J. Trop. Ecol., 17, 79, 10.1017/S0266467401001055 · DOI
  9. Clark, 2002, Are tropical forests an important carbon sink? Reanalysis of the long-term plot data, Ecol. Appl., 12, 3, 10.1890/1051-0761(2002)012[0003:ATFAIC]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  10. Clark, 1996, Abundance, growth and mortality of very large trees in neotropical lowland rain forest, Forest Ecol. Manage., 80, 235, 10.1016/0378-1127(95)03607-5 · DOI
  11. Clark, 2000, Landscape-scale variation in forest structure and biomass in a tropical rain forest, Forest Ecol. Manage., 137, 185, 10.1016/S0378-1127(99)00327-8 · DOI
  12. Clark, 1999, Edaphic factors and the landscape-scale distribution of tropical rain forest trees, Ecology, 80, 2662, 10.1890/0012-9658(1999)080[2662:EFATLS]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  13. Costa, 2005, Mesoscale distribution of Amazonian understorey herbs in relation to topography, soil and watersheds, J. Ecol., 93, 863, 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2005.01020.x · DOI
  14. Cummings, 2002, Aboveground biomass and structure of rainforests in the southwestern Brazilian Amazon, Forest Ecol. Manage., 163, 293, 10.1016/S0378-1127(01)00587-4 · DOI
  15. Daws, 2002, Topographic position affects the water regime in a semideciduous tropical forest in Panamá, Plant Soil, 238, 79, 10.1023/A:1014289930621 · DOI
  16. DeWalt, 2004, Structure and biomass of four lowland neotropical forests, Biotropica, 36, 7
  17. Fearnside, 1996, Amazonian deforestation and global warming: carbon stocks in vegetation replacing Brazil's Amazon forest, Forest Ecol. Manage., 80, 21, 10.1016/0378-1127(95)03647-4 · DOI
  18. Frangi, 1985, Ecosystem dynamics of a subtropical floodplain forest, Ecol. Monogr., 55, 351, 10.2307/1942582 · DOI
  19. Gale, 1999, Canopy tree mode of death in a western Ecuadorian rain forest, J. Trop. Ecol., 15, 415, 10.1017/S0266467499000929 · DOI
  20. Henderson, 1993, A flórula da Reserva Ducke, I: Palmae (Arecaceae), Acta Amazon., 23, 349, 10.1590/1809-43921993234369 · DOI
  21. Higuchi, 1998, Biomassa da parte aérea da vegetação da floresta tropical úmida de terra-firme da Amazônia Brasileira, Acta Amazon., 28, 153, 10.1590/1809-43921998282166 · DOI
  22. Holmes, 2004, Soil databases and the problem of establishing regional biogeochemical trends, Global Change Biol., 10, 796, 10.1111/j.1529-8817.2003.00753.x · DOI
  23. Houghton, 2005, Aboveground forest biomass and the global carbon balance, Global Change Biol., 11, 945, 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2005.00955.x · DOI
  24. Houghton, 2001, The spatial distribution of forest biomass in the Brazilian Amazon: a comparison of estimates, Global Change Biol., 7, 731, 10.1046/j.1365-2486.2001.00426.x · DOI
  25. Hughes, 1999, Biomass, carbon, and nutrient dynamics of secondary forests in a humid tropical region of México, Ecology, 80, 1892
  26. Keller, 2001, Biomass estimation in the Tapajós National Forest, Brazil. Examination of sampling and allometric uncertainties, Forest Ecol. Manage., 154, 371, 10.1016/S0378-1127(01)00509-6 · DOI
  27. Kinupp, 2005, Spatial patterns in the understory shrub genus Psychotria in central Amazonia: effects of distance and topography, J. Trop. Ecol., 21, 363, 10.1017/S0266467405002440 · DOI
  28. Körner, 2003, Slow in, rapid out—carbon flux studies and Kyoto targets, Science, 300, 1242, 10.1126/science.1084460 · DOI
  29. Laurance, 1999, Relationship between soils and Amazon forest biomass: a landscape-scale study, Forest Ecol. Manage., 118, 127, 10.1016/S0378-1127(98)00494-0 · DOI
  30. Lescure, 1985, Relationships between soil and vegetation in a tropical rain forest in French Guiana, Biotropica, 17, 155, 10.2307/2388508 · DOI
  31. Luizão, 2004, Variation of carbon and nitrogen cycling processes along a topographic gradient in a Central Amazonian forest, Global Change Biol., 10, 592, 10.1111/j.1529-8817.2003.00757.x · DOI
  32. Magnusson, 2005, RAPELD: A modification of the Gentry method for biodiversity surveys in long-term ecological research sites, Biota Neotrop., 5, 1, 10.1590/S1676-06032005000300002 · DOI
  33. Malhi, 2000, Tropical forests and atmospheric carbon dioxide, Trends Ecol. Evol., 15, 332, 10.1016/S0169-5347(00)01906-6 · DOI
  34. Marques-Filho, 1981, Estudos climatológicos da Reserva Florestal Ducke, Manaus, AM. IV-precipitação, Acta Amazon., 4, 759, 10.1590/1809-43921981114759 · DOI
  35. Mertens, J., 2004. The characterization of selected physical and chemical soil properties of the surface soil layer in the “Reserva Ducke”, Manaus, Brazil, with emphasis on their spatial distribution. Bachelor Thesis. Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin. Berlin.
  36. Murphy, 1962, A modified single solution method for the determination of phosphate in natural waters, Anal. Chim. Acta, 27, 31, 10.1016/S0003-2670(00)88444-5 · DOI
  37. Nascimento, 2002, Total aboveground biomass in central Amazonian rainforest: a landscape-scale study, Forest Ecol. Manage., 168, 311, 10.1016/S0378-1127(01)00749-6 · DOI · Paper page
  38. Richter, 1991, Soil diversity in the tropics, Adv. Ecol. Res., 21, 315, 10.1016/S0065-2504(08)60100-2 · DOI
  39. Robert, 2003, Simulation of the effect of topography and tree falls on stand dynamics and stand structure of tropical forest, Ecol. Modell., 167, 287, 10.1016/S0304-3800(03)00200-X · DOI
  40. Sabatier, 1997, The influence of soil cover organization on the floristic and structural heterogeneity of a Guianan rain forest, Plant Ecol., 131, 81, 10.1023/A:1009775025850 · DOI
  41. Saldarriaga, 1988, Long-term chronosequence of forest succession in the upper Rio Negro of Colombia and Venezuela, J. Ecol., 76, 938, 10.2307/2260625 · DOI
  42. Santos, J., 1996. Análise de modelos de regressão para estimar a fitomassa de floresta tropical úmida de terra-firme da Amazonia Central. PhD Thesis, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brasil.
  43. Sheil, 1995, A critique of permanent plot methods and analysis with examples from Budongo Forest, Uganda, Forest Ecol. Manage., 77, 11, 10.1016/0378-1127(95)03583-V · DOI
  44. Silva, 2002, Diameter increment and growth patterns for individual trees growing in central Amazon, Brazil, Forest Ecol. Manage., 166, 295, 10.1016/S0378-1127(01)00678-8 · DOI
  45. Silver, 2000, Effects of soil texture on belowground carbon and nutrient storage in a lowland Amazonian forest ecosystem, Ecosystem, 3, 193, 10.1007/s100210000019 · DOI
  46. Sollins, 1998, Factors influencing species composition in tropical lowland rain forest: does soil matter?, Ecology, 79, 23, 10.1890/0012-9658(1998)079[0023:FISCIT]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  47. Sombroek, 2000, Amazon land forms and soils in relation to biological diversity, Acta Amazon., 30, 81, 10.1590/1809-43922000301100 · DOI
  48. Tuomisto, 2003, Floristic patterns along a 43-km long transect in an Amazonian rain forest, J. Ecol., 91, 743, 10.1046/j.1365-2745.2003.00802.x · DOI
  49. Zarin, 2001, Potential biomass accumulation in Amazonian regrowth forests, Ecosystems, 4, 658, 10.1007/s10021-001-0035-y · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
de Castilho, C. V., Magnusson, W. E., de Araújo, R. N. O., Luizão, R. C. C., Luizão, F. J., Lima, A. P., & Higuchi, N.
Venue
Forest Ecology and Management
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-10
Volume
234
Issue
1-3
Pages
85-96
ISSN
0378-1127
DOI
10.1016/j.foreco.2006.06.024
Cited by
319
References
0
Language
en
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review