Cited by 755Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource ManagementForest Management and PolicyForest Ecology and Conservation

Community managed forests and forest protected areas: An assessment of their conservation effectiveness across the tropics

Porter-Bolland, Luciana, Ellis, Edward A., Guariguata, Manuel R., Ruiz-Mallén, Isabel, Negrete-Yankelevich, Simoneta, Reyes-García, Victoria·2012·Forest Ecology and Management

Abstract

This paper assesses the role of protected and community managed forests for the long term maintenance of forest cover in the tropics. Through a meta-analysis of published case-studies, we compare land use/cover change data for these two broad types of forest management and assess their performance in maintaining forest cover. Case studies included 40 protected areas and 33 community managed forests from the peer reviewed literature. A statistical comparison of annual deforestation rates and a Qualitative Comparative Analysis were conducted. We found that as a whole, community managed forests presented lower and less variable annual deforestation rates than protected forests. We consider that a more resilient and robust forest conservation strategy should encompass a regional vision with different land use types in which social and economic needs of local inhabitants, as well as tenure rights and local capacities, are recognized. Further research for understanding institutional arrangements that derive from local governance in favor of tropical forest conservation is recommended.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.foreco.2011.05.034

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 109 · Cited by 755

Authors
Porter-Bolland, L., Ellis, E. A., Guariguata, M. R., Ruiz-Mallén, I., Negrete-Yankelevich, S., & Reyes-García, V.
Affiliations
  • Universidad Veracruzana (MX)
  • Center for International Forestry Research (ID)
Venue
Forest Ecology and Management
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-03
Volume
268
Pages
6-17
ISSN
0378-1127 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2136774757
Cited by
755
References
109
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 41 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 47 · 2021: 80 · 2020: 65 · 2019: 67 · 2018: 63 · 2017: 47 · 2016: 59 · 2015: 59 · 2014: 55 · 2013: 47 · 2012: 41
FWCI
40.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Forest Ecology and Management (publishedVersion)
  • CGSPace A Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (Consultative Group for International Agricultural Research) (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Forest Management and Policy
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Forestry › Forest Ecology and Conservation
Keywords
community forest, protected areas, deforestation rates, tropical forests, land use and land cover change, tenure rights, local governance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review