Community managed forests and forest protected areas: An assessment of their conservation effectiveness across the tropics
Abstract
This paper assesses the role of protected and community managed forests for the long term maintenance of forest cover in the tropics. Through a meta-analysis of published case-studies, we compare land use/cover change data for these two broad types of forest management and assess their performance in maintaining forest cover. Case studies included 40 protected areas and 33 community managed forests from the peer reviewed literature. A statistical comparison of annual deforestation rates and a Qualitative Comparative Analysis were conducted. We found that as a whole, community managed forests presented lower and less variable annual deforestation rates than protected forests. We consider that a more resilient and robust forest conservation strategy should encompass a regional vision with different land use types in which social and economic needs of local inhabitants, as well as tenure rights and local capacities, are recognized. Further research for understanding institutional arrangements that derive from local governance in favor of tropical forest conservation is recommended.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Economic development choices could cause less deterioration in the presence of environmental policy.
“economic development choices could cause less deterioration in the presence of environmental policy”
From Pervasive human-driven decline of life on Earth points to the need for transformative change (2019) · cites this paper as [68]
The lack of publicly enforced rights could undermine resource management and conservation practices by Indigenous Peoples and local communities.
“the lack of publicly enforced rights could undermine resource management and conservation practices by Indigenous Peoples and local communities ( 68 ).”
From Pervasive human-driven decline of life on Earth points to the need for transformative change (2019) · cites this paper as [68]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 109 · Cited by 755
- Authors
- Porter-Bolland, L., Ellis, E. A., Guariguata, M. R., Ruiz-Mallén, I., Negrete-Yankelevich, S., & Reyes-García, V.
- Affiliations
- Universidad Veracruzana (MX)
- Center for International Forestry Research (ID)
- Venue
- Forest Ecology and Management
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-03
- Volume
- 268
- Pages
- 6-17
- ISSN
- 0378-1127 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2136774757
- Cited by
- 755
- References
- 109
- Citations by year
- 2026: 20 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 41 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 47 · 2021: 80 · 2020: 65 · 2019: 67 · 2018: 63 · 2017: 47 · 2016: 59 · 2015: 59 · 2014: 55 · 2013: 47 · 2012: 41
- FWCI
- 40.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Forest Ecology and Management (publishedVersion)
- CGSPace A Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (Consultative Group for International Agricultural Research) (acceptedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Forest Management and Policy
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Forestry › Forest Ecology and Conservation
- Keywords
- community forest, protected areas, deforestation rates, tropical forests, land use and land cover change, tenure rights, local governance
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review