Effects of ungulate herbivory on aspen, cottonwood, and willow development under forest fuels treatment regimes
Abstract
Herbivory by domestic and wild ungulates can dramatically affect vegetation structure, composition and dynamics in nearly every terrestrial ecosystem of the world. These effects are of particular concern in forests of western North America, where intensive herbivory by native and domestic ungulates has the potential to substantially reduce or eliminate deciduous, highly palatable species of aspen (Populus tremuloides), cottonwood (Populus trichocarpa), and willow (Salix spp.). In turn, differential herbivory pressure may favor greater establishment of unpalatable conifers that serve as ladder fuels for stand-replacing fires. The resulting high fuel loads often require silvicultural fuels reductions to mitigate fire risk, which in turn may facilitate additional recruitment of deciduous species but also additional herbivory pressure. Potential interactions of ungulate herbivory with episodic disturbances of silviculture, fire, and other land uses are not well documented, but are thought to operate synergistically to affect forest dynamics. We evaluated individual and joint effects of ungulate herbivory and fuels reduction treatments in grand fir (Abies grandis) and Douglas-fir (Psuedotsuga menziezii) forests that dominate large areas of interior western North America. We applied fuels reduction treatments of mechanical thinning and prescribed fire and then evaluated the responses of aspen, cottonwood, and willow species to these treatments (N=3) versus areas of no treatment (N=…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Reduced elk herbivory alone is not a strong basis for concluding it is the primary cause of major aspen demographic change, because aspen do not always respond to experimental protection from herbivory.
“The conspicuous alleviation of one factor, elk herbivory, during the past few years may not be a strong basis for concluding that it is the primary cause of a sea change in aspen demography, as studies have further suggested that aspen do not always respond to experimental protection from herbivory (Endress et al. 2012).”
From Trophic Cascades in a Multicausal World: Isle Royale and Yellowstone (2014) · cites this paper as Endress et al. 2012
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 50 · Cited by 29
- Authors
- Endress, B. A., Wisdom, M. J., Vavra, M., Parks, C. G., Dick, B. L., Naylor, B. J., & Boyd, J. M.
- Affiliations
- Oregon State University (US)
- US Forest Service (US)
- Corresponding author
- Endress, Bryan A.
- Venue
- Forest Ecology and Management
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-07
- Volume
- 276
- Pages
- 33-40
- ISSN
- 0378-1127 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2119356078
- Cited by
- 29
- References
- 50
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 2.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Forest Ecology and Management (publishedVersion)
- Lincoln (University of Nebraska) (submittedVersion)
- Digital Commons - USU (Utah State University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- San Diego Zoo Institute for Conservation Research
- U.S. Forest Service
- Pacific Northwest Research Station
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Rangeland and Wildlife Management
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Fire effects on ecosystems
- Keywords
- ungulate herbivory, aspen, cottonwood, willow, Populus tremuloides, Populus trichocarpa, grand fir, Pseudotsuga menziesii, prescribed burning, mechanical thinning, elk, mule deer, cattle, ladder fuels, stand-replacing fire, western North America
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review