The DOI matches its Crossref record; 88 of the 88 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A critical review of forest biomass estimation models, common mistakes and corrective measures
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach.
Guthery, F. S., Burnham, K. P., & Anderson, D. R. (2003) · The Journal of Wildlife Management · doi:10.2307/3802723 · Cited by 41,495
Analysis of Ecological Communities
McCune, B., & Grace, J. B. (2002) · Cited by 5,986
Analysis of Ecological Communities
Anderson, M. J. (2003) · Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology · doi:10.1016/s0022-0981(03)00091-1 · Cited by 5,086
Tree allometry and improved estimation of carbon stocks and balance in tropical forests
Chave, J., Andalo, C., Brown, S., Cairns, M. A., Chambers, J. Q., Eamus, D., Fölster, H., Fromard, F., Higuchi, N., Kira, T., et al. (2005) · Oecologia · doi:10.1007/s00442-005-0100-x · Cited by 3,533
An Introduction to Statistical Learning: with Applications in R
James, G. M., Witten, D., Hastie, T. J., & Tibshirani, R. J. (2018) · doi:10.25334/q4ht55 · Cited by 2,912
CONFRONTING MULTICOLLINEARITY IN ECOLOGICAL MULTIPLE REGRESSION
Graham, M. H. (2003) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/02-3114 · Cited by 2,536
Bivariate line‐fitting methods for allometry
Warton, D. I., Wright, I. J., Falster, D. S., & Westoby, M. (2006) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1017/s1464793106007007 · Cited by 2,319
ALLOMETRY AND SIZE IN ONTOGENY AND PHYLOGENY
GOULD, S. J. (1966) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1469-185x.1966.tb01624.x · Cited by 2,280
Good Practice Guidance for Land Use, Land-Use Change and Forestry
Penman, J., Gytarsky, M. L., Hiraishi, T., Krug, T., Kruger, D., Pipatti, R., Buendia, L. V., Miwa, K., Ngara, T., Tanabe, K., et al. (2003) · IIASA PURE (International Institute of Applied Systems Analysis) · Cited by 2,005
The Fourth Dimension of Life: Fractal Geometry and Allometric Scaling of Organisms
West, G. B., Brown, J. H., & Enquist, B. J. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.284.5420.1677 · Cited by 1,718
Cited by
Paul, K. I., Roxburgh, S. H., Chave, J., England, J. R., Zerihun, A., Specht, A., Lewis, T., Bennett, L. T., Baker, T. G., Adams, M. A., et al. (2016) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.13201 · Cited by 206
Metadata
- Authors
- Sileshi, G. W.
- Venue
- Forest Ecology and Management
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-10
- Volume
- 329
- Pages
- 237-254
- ISSN
- 0378-1127 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2087198979
- Cited by
- 437
- References
- 88
- FWCI
- 22.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A critical review of forest biomass estimation models, common mistakes and corrective measures. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.foreco.2014.06.026
- The paper
- Sileshi, G. W. (2014). A critical review of forest biomass estimation models, common mistakes and corrective measures. Forest Ecology and Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2014.06.026
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
