Cited by 404Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource ManagementForest Ecology and ConservationAgricultural Innovations and Practices

Economic dependence on forest resources: A case from Dendi District, Ethiopia

Mamo, Getachew, Sjaastad, Espen, Vedeld, Pål·2007·Forest Policy and Economics

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.forpol.2006.08.001

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The literature suggests that absolute environmental income rises with total income.

    “The literature suggests that absolute environmental income rises with total income, while relative environmental income (i.e., the share of environmental income in total household income) decreases—i.e., household’s environmental “dependence” or “reliance” decreases with higher incomes (Cavendish, 2000; Escobal & Aldana, 2003; Mamo et al., 2007; Neumann & Hirsch, 2000; Vedeld et al., 2007).”

    From Environmental Income and Rural Livelihoods: A Global-Comparative Analysis (2014) · cites this paper as Mamo et al., 2007

  • The literature suggests that relative environmental income decreases with higher incomes.

    “The literature suggests that absolute environmental income rises with total income, while relative environmental income (i.e., the share of environmental income in total household income) decreases—i.e., household’s environmental “dependence” or “reliance” decreases with higher incomes (Cavendish, 2000; Escobal & Aldana, 2003; Mamo et al., 2007; Neumann & Hirsch, 2000; Vedeld et al., 2007).”

    From Environmental Income and Rural Livelihoods: A Global-Comparative Analysis (2014) · cites this paper as Mamo et al., 2007

  • Environmental income is more important to large households.

    “In general, we find support for environmental income being more important to households with young household heads (c.f. McElwee, 2008), to large households (in contrast to Mamo et al., 2007 who found the opposite in their case study), and to less-educated households (e.g., Babulo et al., 2008; Mamo et al., 2007; Vedeld et al., 2007).”

    From Environmental Income and Rural Livelihoods: A Global-Comparative Analysis (2014) · cites this paper as Mamo et al., 2007

  • Environmental income is more important to less-educated households.

    “In general, we find support for environmental income being more important to households with young household heads (c.f. McElwee, 2008), to large households (in contrast to Mamo et al., 2007 who found the opposite in their case study), and to less-educated households (e.g., Babulo et al., 2008; Mamo et al., 2007; Vedeld et al., 2007).”

    From Environmental Income and Rural Livelihoods: A Global-Comparative Analysis (2014) · cites this paper as Mamo et al., 2007

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mamo, G., Sjaastad, E., & Vedeld, P.
Affiliations
  • SOS Sahel Ethiopia (ET)
  • Norwegian University of Life Sciences (NO)
Corresponding author
Sjaastad, Espen
Venue
Forest Policy and Economics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-05
Volume
9
Issue
8
Pages
916-927
ISSN
1389-9341 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2066887789
Cited by
404
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 36 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 31 · 2012: 22
FWCI
5.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Forest Policy and Economics (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Forestry › Forest Ecology and Conservation
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agricultural Innovations and Practices
Keywords
forest dependence, forest resources, household income, rural households, income inequality, income equalization, poverty, peasant organizations, forest access

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review