Economic dependence on forest resources: A case from Dendi District, Ethiopia
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The literature suggests that absolute environmental income rises with total income.
“The literature suggests that absolute environmental income rises with total income, while relative environmental income (i.e., the share of environmental income in total household income) decreases—i.e., household’s environmental “dependence” or “reliance” decreases with higher incomes (Cavendish, 2000; Escobal & Aldana, 2003; Mamo et al., 2007; Neumann & Hirsch, 2000; Vedeld et al., 2007).”
From Environmental Income and Rural Livelihoods: A Global-Comparative Analysis (2014) · cites this paper as Mamo et al., 2007
The literature suggests that relative environmental income decreases with higher incomes.
“The literature suggests that absolute environmental income rises with total income, while relative environmental income (i.e., the share of environmental income in total household income) decreases—i.e., household’s environmental “dependence” or “reliance” decreases with higher incomes (Cavendish, 2000; Escobal & Aldana, 2003; Mamo et al., 2007; Neumann & Hirsch, 2000; Vedeld et al., 2007).”
From Environmental Income and Rural Livelihoods: A Global-Comparative Analysis (2014) · cites this paper as Mamo et al., 2007
Environmental income is more important to large households.
“In general, we find support for environmental income being more important to households with young household heads (c.f. McElwee, 2008), to large households (in contrast to Mamo et al., 2007 who found the opposite in their case study), and to less-educated households (e.g., Babulo et al., 2008; Mamo et al., 2007; Vedeld et al., 2007).”
From Environmental Income and Rural Livelihoods: A Global-Comparative Analysis (2014) · cites this paper as Mamo et al., 2007
Environmental income is more important to less-educated households.
“In general, we find support for environmental income being more important to households with young household heads (c.f. McElwee, 2008), to large households (in contrast to Mamo et al., 2007 who found the opposite in their case study), and to less-educated households (e.g., Babulo et al., 2008; Mamo et al., 2007; Vedeld et al., 2007).”
From Environmental Income and Rural Livelihoods: A Global-Comparative Analysis (2014) · cites this paper as Mamo et al., 2007
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Environmental Income and Rural Livelihoods: A Global-Comparative Analysis
Angelsen, A., Jagger, P., Babigumira, R., Belcher, B., Hogarth, N. J., Bauch, S., Börner, J., Smith-Hall, C., & Wunder, S. (2014) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.03.006 · Cited by 1,147 · see citing works
- Authors
- Mamo, G., Sjaastad, E., & Vedeld, P.
- Affiliations
- SOS Sahel Ethiopia (ET)
- Norwegian University of Life Sciences (NO)
- Corresponding author
- Sjaastad, Espen
- ORCID
- Sjaastad, Espen
- Venue
- Forest Policy and Economics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2007-05
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 916-927
- ISSN
- 1389-9341 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2066887789
- Cited by
- 404
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 36 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 31 · 2012: 22
- FWCI
- 5.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Forest Policy and Economics (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Forestry › Forest Ecology and Conservation
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agricultural Innovations and Practices
- Keywords
- forest dependence, forest resources, household income, rural households, income inequality, income equalization, poverty, peasant organizations, forest access
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review