Progress towards and barriers to implementation of a risk framework for US federal wildland fire policy and decision making
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Conflicting priorities within land management plans and mandates within environmental regulations such as the Clean Air Act and the Endangered Species Act limit the ability to achieve substantial reduction of wildfire hazard.
“Along with societal barriers, conflicting priorities within land management plans and mandates within environmental regulations such as the Clean Air Act and the Endangered Species Act limit the ability to achieve substantial reduction of wildfire hazard (Calkin et al. 2011).”
From Negative consequences of positive feedbacks in US wildfire management (2015) · cites this paper as Calkin et al. 2011
Existing land and fire management plans have not sufficiently considered the role of existing beneficial use on future fire management opportunities.
“Existing land and fire management plans have not sufficiently considered the role of existing beneficial use on future fire management opportunities (Doan et al. 2006;Calkin et al. 2011)”
From Negative consequences of positive feedbacks in US wildfire management (2015) · cites this paper as Calkin et al. 2011
Cites
Reinhardt, E. D., Keane, R. E., Calkin, D. E., & Cohen, J. D. (2008) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2008.09.016 · Cited by 349 · see citing works
Self-citationSimulation of long-term landscape-level fuel treatment effects on large wildfires
Finney, M. A., Seli, R. C., McHugh, C. W., Ager, A. A., Bahro, B., & Agee, J. K. (2007) · International Journal of Wildland Fire · doi:10.1071/wf06064 · Cited by 278 · see citing works
Self-citationThe Effect of Newspaper Coverage and Political Pressure on Wildfire Suppression Costs
Donovan, G. H., Prestemon, J. P., & Gebert, K. (2011) · Society & Natural Resources · doi:10.1080/08941921003649482 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Negative consequences of positive feedbacks in US wildfire management
Calkin, D. E., Thompson, M. P., & Finney, M. A. (2015) · Forest Ecosystems · doi:10.1186/s40663-015-0033-8 · Cited by 323 · see citing works
Self-citation<scp>U.S.</scp> federal fire and forest policy: emphasizing resilience in dry forests
Stephens, S. L., Collins, B. M., Biber, E., & Fulé, P. Z. (2016) · Ecosphere · doi:10.1002/ecs2.1584 · Cited by 205 · see citing works
Portugal and Chile: Longing for sustainable forestry while rising from the ashes
Gómez-González, S., Ojeda, F., & Fernandes, P. M. (2018) · Environmental Science & Policy · doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2017.11.006 · Cited by 129 · see citing works
Allowing a wildfire to burn: estimating the effect on future fire suppression costs
Houtman, R. M., Montgomery, C. A., Gagnon, A. R., Calkin, D. E., Dietterich, T. G., McGregor, S., & Crowley, M. (2013) · International Journal of Wildland Fire · doi:10.1071/wf12157 · Cited by 85 · see citing works
Self-citationA Risk-Based Approach to Wildland Fire Budgetary Planning
Thompson, M. P., Calkin, D. E., Finney, M. A., Gebert, K. M., & Hand, M. S. (2013) · Forest Science · doi:10.5849/forsci.09-124 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Calkin, D. C., Finney, M. A., Ager, A. A., Thompson, M. P., & Gebert, K. M.
- Affiliations
- US Forest Service (US)
- Venue
- Forest Policy and Economics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-06
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 378-389
- ISSN
- 1389-9341 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1989670221
- Cited by
- 107
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 6.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Forest Policy and Economics (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. Department of the Interior
- U.S. Forest Service
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Fire effects on ecosystems
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Forest Management and Policy
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Disaster Management and Resilience
- Keywords
- wildfire risk management, wildfire simulation, public lands management, federal agencies
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
