Contribution of the study of acetabulum for the estimation of adult subjects
Abstract
Introduction The study of the posterior part of the pelvis is of interest in forensic anthropology since it is an anatomical region that is very often preserved. The Lovejoy technique, using the auricular surface has brought about many studies and attracted many authors, among them Buckberry and Chamberlain utilized the criteria described by Lovejoy and developed new methods. By using this research as a starting point, we have described acetabular criteria. The goal of this study was to test these criteria and to link them to auricular surface reading criteria, as described by Buckberry and Chamberlain. Method The study concerned 52 pelvises of known age and sex. We studied the age correlation of various criteria read at the acetabulum level and that of the auricular surface. We then went on to draw up scores and established a correlation of these scores with age. Intra- and inter-observer variability was also studied. We used the SPSS software package for statistical analyses. Discussion We were able to isolate four acetabular criteria and four auricular surface criteria which have a correlation with age. Establishing these scores (sum of criteria) allows a better age-based correlation to be obtained. Establishing an overall score, including acetabular criteria and auricular surface criteria, allows a good level of correlation to be obtained with age, with low intra- and inter-observer variability. Conclusion The study of acetabulum is of interest for the age estimation of a…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The auricular surface of the ilium and the acetabulum are resilient to postdepositional events, including weathering and breakage.
“The auricular surface of the ilium and the acetabulum are two areas of the os coxa that have been reported in earlier research to be resilient to postdepositional events, including weathering and breakage [23].”
From Three methods of estimating age‐at‐death using three different regions on the os coxa (2026) · cites this paper as [23]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Three methods of estimating age‐at‐death using three different regions on the os coxa
Mkhonza, S. S., Ngubane, N. P., Aladeyelu, O. S., & Rennie, C. O. (2026) · Journal of Forensic Sciences · doi:10.1111/1556-4029.70219
- Authors
- Rougé-Maillart, C., Jousset, N., Vielle, B., Gaudin, A., & Telmon, N.
- Venue
- Forensic Science International
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2007-09
- Volume
- 171
- Issue
- 2-3
- Pages
- 103-110
- ISSN
- 0379-0738
- Cited by
- 44
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review