The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Y-chromosomal STR haplotypes in Kalmyk population samples
Abstract
Seventeen Y-chromosomal short tandem repeats (STRs), DYS19, DYS389I, DYS389II, DYS390, DYS391, DYS392, DYS393, DYS385ab, DYS437, DYS438, DYS439, GATA-H4, DYS448, DYS456, DYS458, DYS635 were typed in DNA samples from the Kalmyk population (n=99). The population is characterized by a high proportion of duplicated DYS19 alleles and deletions of the locus DYS448 on the background of the Central Asian haplogroup C*. AMOVA analysis reveals a close vicinity to Mongolian and Kazakh populations and large genetic distance to geographical neighbours from Russia, Ukraine and the Caucasus.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The other 3 individuals including Russian, Uzbek, and Tajik were previously assigned to the Y-haplogroups R1*-M173, R1b1a*-P297, and R1b1a*-P297, respectively, by Y-SNP analysis [34, 35], except for Kalmyk 73 which was not previously assigned to the specific Y-haplogroup in the literature [33].”
From Molecular Genealogy of a Mongol Queen’s Family and Her Possible Kinship with Genghis Khan (2016) · cites this paper as [33]
In the citing paper
“By the 9th century, the Shato Turks of the Western Göktürks Khaganate, as ancestors of the Ongud, moved to modern-day Inner Mongolia and eventually were dominated by the Mongol Oirats, later known as Kalmyks, suggesting an anthropological connection of the Ongud with Kalmyks [33, 45, 46, 61, 62].”
From Molecular Genealogy of a Mongol Queen’s Family and Her Possible Kinship with Genghis Khan (2016) · cites this paper as [33]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 15
- Nasidze, 2005, Genetic evidence for the Mongolian ancestry of Kalmyks, Am. J. Phys. Anthropol., 128, 846, 10.1002/ajpa.20159 · DOI · Paper page
- Mulero, 2006, Development and validation of the AmpFlSTR Yfiler PCR amplification kit: a male specific, single amplification 17 Y-STR multiplex system, J. Forensic Sci., 51, 64, 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2005.00016.x · DOI
- Miller, 1988, A simple salting out procedure for extracting DNA from human nucleated cells, Nucleic Acids Res., 16, 1215, 10.1093/nar/16.3.1215 · DOI
- Rand, 2004, The GEDNAP blind trial concept part II. Trends and developments, Int. J. Legal Med., 118, 83, 10.1007/s00414-003-0421-4 · DOI
- Excoffier, 1992, Analysis of molecular variance inferred from metric distances among DNA haplotypes: application to human mitochondrial DNA restriction data, Genetics, 131, 479, 10.1093/genetics/131.2.479 · DOI · Paper page
- Roewer, 1996, Analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) of Y-chromosome-specific microsatellites in two closely related human populations, Hum. Mol. Genet., 5, 1029, 10.1093/hmg/5.7.1029 · DOI
- Niederstätter, 2005, Separate analysis of DYS385a and b versus conventional DYS385 typing: is there forensic relevance?, Int. J. Legal Med., 119, 1, 10.1007/s00414-004-0437-4 · DOI
- Page, 1996, Treeview: an application to display phylogenetic trees on personal computers, Comput. Appl. Biosci., 12, 357
- Nasidze, 2003, Haplotypes from the Caucasus, Turkey and Iran for nine Y-STR loci, Forensic Sci. Int., 137, 85, 10.1016/S0379-0738(03)00272-X · DOI
- Wozniak, 2006, Allelic and haplotypic frequencies at 11 Y-STR loci in Buryats from South-East Siberia, Forensic Sci. Int., 164, 271, 10.1016/j.forsciint.2005.11.023 · DOI
- Keyser-Tracqui, 2006, Population origins in Mongolia: genetic structure analysis of ancient and modern DNA, Am. J. Phys. Anthropol., 131, 272, 10.1002/ajpa.20429 · DOI
- Zerjal, 1997, Genetic relationships of Asians and Northern Europeans, revealed by Y-chromosomal DNA analysis, Am. J. Hum. Genet., 60, 1174
- Kwak, 2005, Y-chromosomal STR haplotypes and their applications to forensic and population studies in east Asia, Int. J. Legal Med., 119, 195, 10.1007/s00414-004-0518-4 · DOI
- Repping, 2003, Polymorphism for a 1.6-Mb deletion of the human Y chromosome persists through balance between recurrent mutation and haploid selection, Nat. Genet., 35, 247, 10.1038/ng1250 · DOI
- S. Willuweit, L. Roewer, Y chromosome haplotype reference database: update, Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. (2007) in press. · DOI
Cited by
Dulik, M. C., Zhadanov, S. I., Osipova, L. P., Askapuli, A., Gau, L., Gokcumen, O., Rubinstein, S., & Schurr, T. G. (2012) · The American Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.ajhg.2011.12.014 · Cited by 161
Molecular Genealogy of a Mongol Queen’s Family and Her Possible Kinship with Genghis Khan
Lkhagvasuren, G., Shin, H., Lee, S. E., Tumen, D., Kim, J.-H., Kim, K.-Y., Kim, K., Park, A. J., Lee, H. W., Kim, M. J., et al. (2016) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0161622 · Cited by 19
Medieval Super-Grandfather founder of Western Kazakh Clans from Haplogroup C2a1a2-M48
Zhabagin, M., Sabitov, Z., Tazhigulova, I., Alborova, I., Agdzhoyan, A., Wei, L.-H., Urasin, V., Koshel, S., Mustafin, K., Akilzhanova, A., et al. (2021) · Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1038/s10038-021-00901-5 · Cited by 16
Metadata
- Authors
- Roewer, L., Krüger, C., Willuweit, S., Nagy, M., Rodig, H., Kokshunova, L., Rothämel, T., Kravchenko, S., Jobling, M. A., Stoneking, M., & Nasidze, I.
- Venue
- Forensic Science International
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2007-12
- Volume
- 173
- Issue
- 2-3
- Pages
- 204-209
- ISSN
- 0379-0738
- Cited by
- 29
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
