Cited by 30Autopsy Techniques and OutcomesForensic Toxicology and Drug AnalysisHomicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse

Forensic autopsies in a naturalistic setting in Norway: Autopsy rates and toxicological findings

Frost, Joachim, Slørdal, Lars, Vege, Åshild, Nordrum, Ivar S.·2012·Forensic Science International

Abstract

Autopsies can give valuable information about the cause of death, and represent an important tool for obtaining valid cause of death statistics. In particular, they may shed light on the circumstances of death in ambiguous and criminal cases. To address the need for information on current autopsy practices, forensic autopsy rates in two counties in Central Norway over the period 2007-2009 were assessed. To investigate toxicological findings that could possibly remain undisclosed without the performance of an autopsy, the impact of alcohol and drugs in forensic autopsy cases from this material was evaluated. The total forensic autopsy rate in this material was 3%. The forensic autopsy rates were low for natural deaths (1%), accidental falls (12%) and the heterogeneous category "other accidents" (21%), relatively high for accidental poisonings (84%), and less than adequate for road traffic accidents (57%). For suicides the forensic autopsy rate was 63%, and for recognized homicides 100%. The total forensic autopsy rate was higher for men than for women (5% vs. 2%), and decreased with age, being 38% in the age group <30 years, 23% in the age group 30-59 years, and 1% in the age group >59 years. Despite that Norwegian legislation and regulations regarding forensic autopsy requests are national, the forensic autopsy rates were generally lower in the county of Nord-Trøndelag than in Sør-Trøndelag, with most striking differences in suicide deaths (11% vs. 91%) and road traffic accidents (46% vs. 67%). This illustrates how autopsy rates, and possibly cause of death registries, might be susceptible to the influence of regional variations in law enforcement, with possible consequences for the quality and validity of cause of death statistics. Of the forensic autopsy cases where toxicological analysis was performed (361 of 364 cases) a total of 71% had positive toxicology results; 12% were positive for alcohol only, 44% were positive for drugs only, and 15% were positive for both alcohol and drugs. The toxicology results suggest that alcohol and drugs are important factors in sudden unexpected deaths, and that a thorough and comprehensive toxicological analysis is called for when investigating these deaths. Mean BAC in alcohol positive forensic autopsy cases was 1.7‰ (median 1.6‰, range 0.29-4.1‰). The average number of substances detected in toxicology positive cases was 2.6 (median 2, range 1-10). The by far most frequently detected classes of substances were (1) benzodiazepines, (2) opioids and (3) alcohol.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.forsciint.2012.10.023

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In Norway, Frost et al. estimated that toxicological investigations were performed in 361 of 365 autopsies, and 2.4% involved suicide by poisoning.

    “A study conducted between 2007 and 2009 by Frost et al. [34] in Norway estimated that toxicological investigations were performed in 361 of 365 autopsies.”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 39 · Cited by 30

Authors
Frost, J., Slørdal, L., Vege, Å., & Nordrum, I. S.
Affiliations
  • Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO)
  • Norwegian Institute of Public Health (NO)
Corresponding author
Frost, Joachim
Venue
Forensic Science International
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-11
Volume
223
Issue
1-3
Pages
353-358
ISSN
0379-0738 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2137907117
Cited by
30
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 2
FWCI
2.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Forensic Science International (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Autopsy Techniques and Outcomes
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Toxicology › Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse
Keywords
toxicological findings, alcohol, drugs, cause of death statistics, sudden unexpected death, traffic accidents, suicide, accidental poisoning, falls, blood alcohol concentration, forensic toxicology, cause of death registry, Norway, Nord-Trøndelag, Sør-Trøndelag
MeSH terms
Accidental Falls, Accidents, Traffic, Adult, Ethanol, Analgesics, Opioid, Autopsy, Benzodiazepines, Cause of Death, Central Nervous System Depressants, Pharmaceutical Preparations, Female, Homicide, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Norway, Poisoning, Illicit Drugs, Suicide, Age Distribution, Sex Distribution, Forensic Toxicology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review