The DOI matches its Crossref record; 38 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Sydney declaration – Revisiting the essence of forensic science through its fundamental principles
Open accessAbstract
Unlike other more established disciplines, a shared understanding and broad acceptance of the essence of forensic science, its purpose, and fundamental principles are still missing or mis-represented. This foundation has been overlooked, although recognised by many forensic science forefathers and seen as critical to this discipline's advancement. The Sydney Declaration attempts to revisit the essence of forensic science through its foundational basis, beyond organisations, technicalities or protocols. It comprises a definition of forensic science and seven fundamental principles that emphasise the pivotal role of the trace as a vestige, or remnant, of an investigated activity. The Sydney Declaration also discusses critical features framing the forensic scientist's work, such as context, time asymmetry, the continuum of uncertainties, broad scientific knowledge, ethics, critical thinking, and logical reasoning. It is argued that the proposed principles should underpin the practice of forensic science and guide education and research directions. Ultimately, they will benefit forensic science as a whole to be more relevant, effective and reliable.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“The ongoing commitment from the global forensic community to improving standards of quality, validity, and professionalism is evident throughout the literature and initiatives emerging from within the industry, along with academia and professional bodies [24, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40].”
From Quality issue management and disclosure in forensic science: A survey of practice and perceptions (2025) · cites this paper as [24]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Forensic science involves the examination of unknown, historical traces, introducing an inherent uncertainty into any form of subsequent analysis or interpretation [23, 24].”
From Quality issue management and disclosure in forensic science: A survey of practice and perceptions (2025) · cites this paper as [24]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Improving Policing: A Problem-Oriented Approach
Goldstein, H. (1979) · Crime & Delinquency · doi:10.1177/001112877902500207 · Cited by 793
Methodological and Epistemic Differences between Historical Science and Experimental Science*
Cleland, C. E. (2002) · Philosophia Scientiæ · doi:10.1086/342455 · Cited by 367
Prediction and Explanation in Historical Natural Science
Cleland, C. E. (2011) · The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1093/bjps/axq024 · Cited by 214
Cognitive bias research in forensic science: A systematic review
Cooper, G. S., & Meterko, V. (2019) · Forensic Science International · doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2019.01.016 · Cited by 214
The Ontogeny of Criminalistics
Kirk, P. L. (1963) · The Journal of Criminal Law Criminology and Police Science · doi:10.2307/1141173 · Cited by 161
From Forensics to Forensic Science
Roux, C. P., Crispino, F., & Olivier Ribaux, A. (2012) · Current Issues in Criminal Justice · doi:10.1080/10345329.2012.12035941 · Cited by 146
Self-citationForensic science on trial - What is the law of the land?
Margot, P. A. (2011) · Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences · doi:10.1080/00450618.2011.555418 · Cited by 116
Self-citationEncyclopedia of Criminology and Criminal Justice
Millard, S. (2014) · Reference Reviews · doi:10.1108/rr-07-2014-0210 · Cited by 101
Rock, Bone, and Ruin: An Optimist’s Guide to the Historical Sciences
Ion, A. (2018) · Norwegian Archaeological Review · doi:10.1080/00293652.2018.1518341 · Cited by 97
Morelato, M., Baechler, S., Ribaux, O., et al. (2014) · Forensic Science International · doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2013.12.045 · Cited by 94
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Margot, 2014, Traçologie: la Trace, Vecteur Fondamental de la Police Scientifique, Rev. Int. Criminol. De. Police Tech.. Sci., 67, 72
- F. Crispino, 2006. Analyse de la scientificité des principes fondamentaux de la criminalistique. PhD thesis, University of Lausanne, Institut de Police Scientifique, Lausanne.
- R. Voisard, 2020. L’empreinte photographique de l’imagerie judiciaire - De la sémiotique aux applications pédagogiques. PhD thesis, University of Lausanne, Ecole des Sciences Criminelles, Lausanne.
- Q. Kwan,1976. Inference of Identity of Source. PhD Thesis, Berkeley University, USA.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Quality Management in forensic science: A closer inspection
Neuteboom, W., Ross, A., Bugeja, L., Willis, S., Roux, C., & Lothridge, K. (2024) · Forensic Science International · doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2023.111779 · Cited by 39
Self-citationMind the gap: The challenges of sustainable forensic science service provision
Bouzin, J. T., Lópes, T., Heavey, A. L., Parrish, J., Sauzier, G., & Lewis, S. W. (2023) · Forensic Science International: Synergy · doi:10.1016/j.fsisyn.2023.100318 · Cited by 27
Quality issue management and disclosure in forensic science: A survey of practice and perceptions
Heavey, A. L., Houck, M. M., Turbett, G. R., & Lewis, S. W. (2025) · Journal of Forensic Sciences · doi:10.1111/1556-4029.70121 · Cited by 10
“Forensic science involves the examination of unknown, historical traces, introducing an inherent uncertainty into any form of subsequent analysis or interpretation [23, 24].”
Metadata
- Authors
- Roux, C., Bucht, R., Crispino, F., De Forest, P., Lennard, C., Margot, P., Miranda, M. D., NicDaeid, N., Ribaux, O., Ross, A., & Willis, S.
- Affiliations
- University of Technology Sydney (AU)
- National Bureau of Investigation (FI)
- Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières (CA)
- Western Sydney University (AU)
- University of Lausanne (CH)
- Farmingdale State College (US)
- Victorian Institute of Forensic Medicine (AU)
- University of Dundee (GB)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Forensic Science International
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2022-03
- Volume
- 332
- Pages
- 111182
- ISSN
- 0379-0738 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4206362109
- Cited by
- 195
- References
- 38
- Citations by year
- 2026: 36 · 2025: 39 · 2024: 60 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 23
- FWCI
- 245.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Forensic Science International (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- SERVAL (Université de Lausanne) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Discovery Research Portal (University of Dundee) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- IRIS (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Le dépôt institutionnel (Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- University of Pennsylvania
- Pennsylvania State University
- Australian Federal Police
- California State University, East Bay
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Law › Legal processes and jurisprudence
- Social Sciences › Law › Ukrainian Legal and Forensic Studies
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Instrumentation › Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation
- Keywords
- trace evidence, vestiges, time asymmetry, forensic ethics, critical thinking, logical reasoning, forensic science education, forensic evidence reliability
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
