What really happens in the neutrophil phagosome?
Open accessAbstract
Current viewpoints concerning the bactericidal mechanisms of neutrophils are reviewed from a perspective that emphasizes challenges presented by the inability to duplicate ex vivo the intracellular milieu. Among the challenges considered are the influences of confinement upon substrate availability and reaction dynamics, direct and indirect synergistic interactions between individual toxins, and bacterial responses to stressors. Approaches to gauging relative contributions of various oxidative and nonoxidative toxins within neutrophils using bacteria and bacterial mimics as intrinsic probes are also discussed.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The most common sources of MPO are neutrophils, where the enzyme is located at the lysosomal level.
“The most common sources are neutrophils, where the enzyme is located at the lysosomal level [29].”
From The Role of Reactive Species on Innate Immunity (2022) · cites this paper as [29]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 168 · Cited by 124
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- [20]See e.g. Voet D Voet JG Biochemistry 1995 Wiley New York 2nd ed.
- [155]Elsbach P Weiss J Gallin JI Goldstein IM Snyderman R Phagocytic cells: oxygen-independent antimicrobial systems of phagocytes. Inflammation: basic principles and clinical correlates 1988 445 470 Raven Press New York
- Authors
- Hurst, J. K.
- Affiliations
- Washington State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Hurst, James K.
- ORCID
- Hurst, James K.
- Venue
- Free Radical Biology and Medicine
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-08
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 508-520
- ISSN
- 0891-5849 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC4382085
- OpenAlex
- W2070505577
- Cited by
- 124
- References
- 168
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 0.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Licence
- Locations
- Free Radical Biology and Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health
- National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (R01AI015834, AI-15842)
- Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, College of Science, Oregon State University
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Neutrophil, Myeloperoxidase and Oxidative Mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Redox biology and oxidative stress
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Antimicrobial Peptides and Activities
- Keywords
- bactericidal mechanism, respiratory burst, phagocytosis, bacterial stress response, toxin synergy, intracellular bacterial killing
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Escherichia coli, Humans, Immunity, Innate, Neutrophils, Oxidation-Reduction, Phagosomes, Staphylococcus aureus, Reactive Oxygen Species, Host-Pathogen Interactions
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review