Cited by 55Redox biology and oxidative stressNitric Oxide and Endothelin EffectsNeutrophil, Myeloperoxidase and Oxidative Mechanisms

How widespread is stable protein S-nitrosylation as an end-effector of protein regulation?

Open access
Wolhuter, Kathryn, Eaton, Philip·2017·Free Radical Biology and Medicine

Abstract

Over the last 25 years protein S-nitrosylation, also known more correctly as S-nitrosation, has been progressively implicated in virtually every nitric oxide-regulated process within the cardiovascular system. The current, widely-held paradigm is that S-nitrosylation plays an equivalent role as phosphorylation, providing a stable and controllable post-translational modification that directly regulates end-effector target proteins to elicit biological responses. However, this concept largely ignores the intrinsic instability of the nitrosothiol bond, which rapidly reacts with typically abundant thiol-containing molecules to generate more stable disulfide bonds. These protein disulfides, formed via a nitrosothiol intermediate redox state, are rationally anticipated to be the predominant end-effector modification that mediates functional alterations when cells encounter nitrosative stimuli. In this review we present evidence and explain our reasoning for arriving at this conclusion that may be controversial to some researchers in the field.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2017.02.013

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 145 · Cited by 55

Authors
Wolhuter, K., & Eaton, P.
Affiliations
St Thomas' Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
Eaton, Philip
Venue
Free Radical Biology and Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-08
Volume
109
Pages
156-166
ISSN
0891-5849 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2586180780
Cited by
55
References
145
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 5
FWCI
0.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Free Radical Biology and Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • British Heart Foundation
  • Department of Health and Social Care
  • Medical Research Council
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research
  • European Research Council
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Redox biology and oxidative stress
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Neutrophil, Myeloperoxidase and Oxidative Mechanisms
Keywords
S-nitrosylation, nitric oxide signaling, post-translational modification, protein disulfide bonds, cardiovascular physiology, protein regulation
MeSH terms
Aldehyde Oxidoreductases, Animals, Cardiovascular System, Disulfides, Humans, Oxidation-Reduction, Protein Processing, Post-Translational, Sulfhydryl Compounds, Thioredoxins, Thioredoxin-Disulfide Reductase, Nitrosation, Glyceraldehyde-3-Phosphate Dehydrogenase (Phosphorylating), S-Nitrosothiols, Nitric Oxide Synthase Type III, Protein Stability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review