Cited by 32Digital and Cyber ForensicsAnomaly Detection Techniques and ApplicationsNetwork Security and Intrusion Detection

Insider threat prediction based on unsupervised anomaly detection scheme for proactive forensic investigation

Open access
Wei, Yichen, Chow, Kam-Pui, Yiu, Siu-Ming·2021·Forensic Science International: Digital Investigation

Abstract

The complexity, concealment and infrequency of malicious internal actions make it difficult to detect insider threats. In the process of traditional reactive forensic investigation, analysis and interpretation of the digital evidence are performed after a crime has been committed. Even if insiders can be detected, they have already caused huge damage. In this paper, we propose a novel general unsupervised anomaly detection scheme based on cascaded autoencoders (CAEs) and joint optimization network. Our core idea is to utilize CAEs to do data purification among unlabeled digital evidence, then jointly optimize the dimension reduction and density estimation network to avoid sub-optimal problems. Based on this scheme, we design an end-to-end insider threat prediction framework for proactive forensic investigation, through which we can make real time response to prevent the harmful influences of insider threats in advance. We extract the tractable and scalable feature representation automatically through the data driven Bidirectional Long Short-Term Memory (BiLSTM) feature extractor, waiving the time-consuming and customarily expert dependable feature engineering work. Additionally, a hypergraph correction module is applied to solve the commonly existed relatively high false positive rate problem in insider threat detection. We evaluate our scheme and framework on public benchmark datasets. The empirical experiments demonstrate that our models outperform state-of-the-art unsupervised methods.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.fsidi.2021.301126

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 49 · Cited by 32

Authors
Wei, Y., Chow, K.-P., & Yiu, S.-M.
Affiliations
University of Hong Kong (HK)
Corresponding author
Yiu, Siu-Ming
Venue
Forensic Science International: Digital Investigation
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-10
Volume
38
Pages
301126
ISSN
2666-2817 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3124852128
Cited by
32
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 2
FWCI
4.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Forensic Science International Digital Investigation (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Digital and Cyber Forensics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Network Security and Intrusion Detection
Keywords
insider threat detection, unsupervised anomaly detection, dimensionality reduction, density estimation, false positive reduction, digital evidence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review