Cited by 60Forensic and Genetic ResearchGenetic diversity and population structureGenomics and Phylogenetic Studies

STRait Razor v2.0: The improved STR Allele Identification Tool--Razor

Warshauer, David H., King, Jonathan L., Budowle, Bruce·2015·Forensic Science International: Genetics

Abstract

STRait Razor (the STR Allele Identification Tool - Razor) was developed as a bioinformatic software tool to detect short tandem repeat (STR) alleles in massively parallel sequencing (MPS) raw data. The method of detection used by STRait Razor allows it to make reliable allele calls for all STR types in a manner that is similar to that of capillary electrophoresis. STRait Razor v2.0 incorporates several new features and improvements upon the original software, such as a larger default locus configuration file that increases the number of detectable loci (now including X-chromosome STRs and Amelogenin), an enhanced custom locus list generator, a novel output sorting method that highlights unique sequences for intra-repeat variation detection, and a genotyping tool that emulates traditional electropherogram data. Users also now have the option to choose whether the program detects autosomal, X-chromosome, Y-chromosome, or all STRs. Concordance testing was performed, and allele calls produced by STRait Razor v2.0 were completely consistent with those made by the original software.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.fsigen.2014.10.011

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Software solutions like GeneMapper ID-X, STRait Razor, and HipSTR include peak-height ratios, heterozygosity thresholds, and ladder alignment checks to minimize false calls.

    “While software solutions like GeneMapper® ID-X [41], STRait Razor [42], and the open-source Haplotype inference and phasing for STRs (HipSTR) [43] include peak-height ratios, heterozygosity thresholds, and ladder alignment checks to minimize false calls, expert review remains crucial [44].”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Warshauer, D. H., King, J. L., & Budowle, B.
Affiliations
University of North Texas Health Science Center (US)
Corresponding author
Budowle, Bruce
Venue
Forensic Science International: Genetics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-01
Volume
14
Pages
182-186
ISSN
1872-4973 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2066614297
Cited by
60
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 7
FWCI
6.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Forensic Science International Genetics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
the National Institute of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice (2012-DN-BXK033)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Forensic and Genetic Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic diversity and population structure
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Keywords
microsatellite markers, next-generation sequencing, amelogenin, genotyping, forensic genetics, allele calling
MeSH terms
Alleles, Base Sequence, DNA, Genotype, Humans, Molecular Sequence Data, Microsatellite Repeats, Chromosomes, Human, X

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review