SNP analyzer – A tool to analyze large sets of genetic markers accounting for linkage
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
False rates, indicating the percentage of unrelated pairs that is falsely concluded as related (LR > 1000), were very low (< 0.02).
“False rates, indicating the percentage of unrelated pairs that is falsely concluded as related (LR > 1000) [43] were very low (< 0.02) (data not shown).”
From Resolving a 150-year-old paternity case in Mormon history using DTC autosomal DNA testing of distant relatives. (2019) · cites this paper as [43]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 4 · Cited by 4
- Authors
- Kling, D.
- Affiliations
- Oslo University Hospital (NO)
- Corresponding author
- Kling, D.
- ORCID
- Kling, D.
- Venue
- Forensic Science International: Genetics Supplement Series
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-12
- Volume
- 6
- Pages
- e587-e588
- ISSN
- 1875-175X (ISSN-L)
- 1875-1768
- OpenAlex
- W2763311542
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2023: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 0.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Forensic science international. Genetics supplement series (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Forensic and Genetic Research
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic diversity and population structure
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
- Keywords
- single nucleotide polymorphisms, genetic markers, linkage analysis, likelihood ratios, forensic genetics, 1000 Genomes Project, case simulation, genetic ancestry testing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
