The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Distances between intuitionistic fuzzy sets and/or interval-valued fuzzy sets based on the Hausdorff metric
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Atanassov, K. T. (1986) · Fuzzy Sets and Systems · doi:10.1016/s0165-0114(86)80034-3 · Cited by 16,465
Cited by
Some geometric aggregation operators based on intuitionistic fuzzy sets
Xu, Z., & Yager, R. R. (2006) · International Journal of General Systems · doi:10.1080/03081070600574353 · Cited by 2,356
Torra, V. (2010) · International Journal of Intelligent Systems · doi:10.1002/int.20418 · Cited by 2,322
Boran, F. E., Genç, S., Kurt, M., & Akay, D. (2009) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2009.03.039 · Cited by 1,500
On hesitant fuzzy sets and decision
Torra, V., & Narukawa, Y. (2009) · 2009 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems · doi:10.1109/fuzzy.2009.5276884 · Cited by 1,205
Distance and similarity measures for hesitant fuzzy sets
Xu, Z., & Xia, M. (2011) · Information Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ins.2011.01.028 · Cited by 1,122
Metadata
- Authors
- Grzegorzewski, P.
- Venue
- Fuzzy Sets and Systems
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2004-12
- Volume
- 148
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 319-328
- ISSN
- 0165-0114 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1982034525
- Cited by
- 632
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Distances between intuitionistic fuzzy sets and/or interval-valued fuzzy sets based on the Hausdorff metric. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.fss.2003.08.005
- The paper
- Grzegorzewski, P. (2004). Distances between intuitionistic fuzzy sets and/or interval-valued fuzzy sets based on the Hausdorff metric. Fuzzy Sets and Systems. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fss.2003.08.005
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
