Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 269

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 125 of the 125 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Low-level interpretability and high-level interpretability: a unified view of data-driven interpretable fuzzy system modelling

Open access
Zhou, Shang-Ming, Gan, John Q.·2008·Fuzzy Sets and Systems
DOI 10.1016/j.fss.2008.05.016
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.fss.2008.05.016

Cites

125 of 125 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 125 references

Research works printed but not linked: 77

  1. Alcala, 2006, Hybrid learning models to get the interpretability-accuracy trade-off in fuzzy modelling, Soft Comput., 10, 717, 10.1007/s00500-005-0002-1 · doi:10.1007/s00500-005-0002-1
  2. Alcala, 2007, A multi-objective genetic algorithm for tuning and rule selection to Obtain accurate and compact linguistic fuzzy rule-based systems, Internat. J. Uncertainty Fuzziness Knowledge-Based Systems, 15, 539, 10.1142/S0218488507004868 · doi:10.1142/s0218488507004868
  3. Alcalá, 2001, Building fuzzy graphs: features and taxonomy of learning non-grid-oriented fuzzy rule-based systems, Internat. J. Intelligent Fuzzy Systems, 11, 99
  4. T. G. Amaral, V. F. Pires, and M. M. Crisostomo, An approach to improve the interpretability of neuro-fuzzy systems, in: Proc. IEEE International Conf. on Fuzzy Systems (FUZZ-IEEE), 16–21 July, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 2006, pp. 8502–8509. · doi:10.1109/fuzzy.2006.1681956
  5. H. C. Anderson, The controller output error method, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Queensland, Australia, 1998.
  6. Berthold, 1999, Constructing fuzzy graphs from examples, Intelligent Data Anal., 3, 37, 10.1016/S1088-467X(99)00004-9 · doi:10.1016/s1088-467x(99)00004-9
  7. Bezdek, 1985, An application of the c-varieties clustering algorithm to polygonal curve fitting, IEEE Trans. Systems Man Cybernet., 15, 637, 10.1109/TSMC.1985.6313440 · doi:10.1109/tsmc.1985.6313440
  8. Bezdek, 1995, Two soft relative of learning vector quantization, Neural Networks, 8, 729, 10.1016/0893-6080(95)00024-T · doi:10.1016/0893-6080(95)00024-t
  9. Bikdash, 1999, A highly interpretable form of Sugeno inference systems, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Systems, 7, 686, 10.1109/91.811237 · doi:10.1109/91.811237
  10. K. M. Bossley, Neurofuzzy modelling approaches in system identification, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Southampton, UK, 1997. · doi:10.1049/ic:19970788
  11. Casillas, 2005, Genetic tuning of fuzzy rule deep structures preserving interpretability and its interaction with fuzzy rule set reduction, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Systems, 13, 13, 10.1109/TFUZZ.2004.839670 · doi:10.1109/tfuzz.2004.839670
  12. Castellano, 2002, Generation of interpretable fuzzy granules by a double-clustering technique, Arch. Control Sci. Special Issue Granular Comput., 12, 397
  13. S. Chiu, J.J. Cheng, Automatic rule generation of fuzzy rule base for robot arm posture selection, in: Proc. of NAFIPS Conf., San Antonio, TX, December 1994, pp. 436–440. · doi:10.1109/ijcf.1994.375071
  14. Cococcioni, 2007, A Pareto-based multi-objective evolutionary approach to the identification of Mamdani fuzzy systems, Soft Comput., 11, 1013, 10.1007/s00500-007-0150-6 · doi:10.1007/s00500-007-0150-6
  15. Cordón, 2003, Author's reply (to comments on the benchmarks in ‘a proposal for improving the accuracy of linguistic modelling’ and related articles), IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Systems, 11, 866
  16. de Oliveira, 1995, A design methodology for fuzzy system interfaces, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Systems, 3, 404, 10.1109/91.481949 · doi:10.1109/91.481949
  17. Destercke, 2007, Building an interpretable fuzzy rule base from data using orthogonal least squares-application to a depollution problem, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 158, 2078, 10.1016/j.fss.2007.04.026 · doi:10.1016/j.fss.2007.04.026
  18. Dubois, 1997, Checking the coherence and redundancy of fuzzy knowledge bases, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Systems, 5, 398, 10.1109/91.618276 · doi:10.1109/91.618276
  19. Espinosa, 2000, Constructing fuzzy models with linguistic integrity from numerical data-AFRELI algorithm, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Systems, 8, 591, 10.1109/91.873582 · doi:10.1109/91.873582
  20. B. Fritzke, Incremental neuro-fuzzy systems, in: Proc. of Application of Soft Computing, SPIE Internat. Symp. on Optical Science, Engineering and Instrumentation, San Diego, USA, 1997, pp. 86–97. · doi:10.1117/12.284208
  21. T. Furuhashi and T. Suzuki, On interpretability of fuzzy models based on conciseness measure, in: Proc. Tenth IEEE Internat. Conf. on Fuzzy Sets (FUZZ-IEEE’01), Melbourne Australia, December, 2001, pp. 284–287. · doi:10.1109/fuzz.2001.1007304
  22. Gan, 1999, Fuzzy local linearization and local basis function expansion in nonlinear system modelling, IEEE Trans. Systems Man Cybernet.—Part B, 29, 559, 10.1109/3477.775275 · doi:10.1109/3477.775275
  23. Gan, 2001, A hybrid learning scheme combining EM and MASMOD algorithms for fuzzy local linearization modelling, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks, 12, 43, 10.1109/72.896795 · doi:10.1109/72.896795
  24. S. Gottwald and U. Petri, An algorithmic approach toward consistency checking systems of fuzzy control rules, in: Proc. Third European Congress on Intelligent Techniques and Soft Computing, Aachen, Germany, 1995, pp. 682–687.
  25. Hefny, 2007, Comments on ‘Distinguishability quantification of fuzzy sets’, Inform. Sci., 177, 4832, 10.1016/j.ins.2007.02.027 · doi:10.1016/j.ins.2007.02.027
  26. Hoeppner, 1997, Fuzzy shell clustering algorithms in image processing: fuzzy c-rectangular and 2-rectangular shells, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Systems, 5, 599, 10.1109/91.649912 · doi:10.1109/91.649912
  27. Hong, 2000, Generalized neurofuzzy network modelling algorithms using Bézier–Bernstein polynomial functions and additive decomposition, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks, 11, 889, 10.1109/72.857770 · doi:10.1109/72.857770
  28. F. Hoppner, F. Klawonn, Obtaining interpretable fuzzy models from fuzzy clustering and fuzzy regression, in: Proc. Fourth Internat. Conf. on Knowledge-based Intelligent Engineering Systems and Allied Tech (KES), Brighton, UK, 2000, pp. 162–165. · doi:10.1109/kes.2000.885783
  29. Ishibuchi, 2001, Three-objective genetics-based machine learning for linguistic rule extraction, Inform. Sci., 136, 109, 10.1016/S0020-0255(01)00144-X · doi:10.1016/s0020-0255(01)00144-x
  30. J. Jakel, L. Groll and R. Mikut, Tree-oriented hypothesis generation for interpretable fuzzy rules, in: Proc. Seventh European Congress on Intelligent Techniques and Soft Computing, Aachen, Germany, 1999, pp. 279–280.
  31. Jang, 1993, Functional equivalence between radial basis function networks and fuzzy inference systems, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks, 4, 156, 10.1109/72.182710 · doi:10.1109/72.182710
  32. C. Jerome, B. Noel, H. Michel, A new fuzzy clustering technique based on PDF estimation, in: Proc. Information Processing and Managing of Uncertainty (IPMU’2002), 2002, pp. 225–232.
  33. F. Jimenez, G. Sanchez, A.F. Gomez-Skarmeta, H. Roubos, R. Babuska, Fuzzy modelling with multi-objective neuro-evolutionary algorithms, in: Proc. of IEEE Internat. Conf. on Systems, Man and Cybernetics (IEEE SMC’02), Yasmine Hammamet, Tunisia, 2002, pp. 253–258.
  34. Jin, 1999, On generating FC3 fuzzy rule systems from data using evolution strategies, IEEE Trans. Systems Man Cybernet. Part B, 29, 829, 10.1109/3477.809036 · doi:10.1109/3477.809036
  35. Johansen, 2000, On the interpretation and identification of dynamic Takagi–Sugeno fuzzy models, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Systems, 8, 297, 10.1109/91.855918 · doi:10.1109/91.855918
  36. Kanjilal, 1995, On the application of orthogonal transformation for the design and analysis of feedforward networks, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks, 6, 1061, 10.1109/72.410351 · doi:10.1109/72.410351
  37. Kim, 1998, A transformed input-domain approach to fuzzy modelling, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Systems, 596
  38. Kim, 2005, On utilizing search methods to select subspace dimensions for kernel-based nonlinear subspace classifiers, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., 27, 136, 10.1109/TPAMI.2005.15 · doi:10.1109/tpami.2005.15
  39. A. Klose, A. Nürnberger, Applying Boolean transformations to fuzzy rule bases, in: Proc. Seventh European Congress on Intelligent Techniques and Soft Computing (EUFIT’99), Verlag Mainz, Aachen, Germany, 1999, p. 6.
  40. A. Klose, A. Nürnberger, D. Nauck, Some approaches to improve the interpretability of neuro-fuzzy classifiers, in: Proc. Sixth European Congress on Intelligent Techniques and Soft Computing (EUFIT’98), Verlag und Druck Mainz GmbH, Aachen, 1998, pp. 629–633.
  41. A. Klose, A. Nürnberger, D. Nauck, Improved NEFCLASS pruning techniques applied to a real world domain, in: G. Krell, B. Michaelis, D. Nauck, R. Kruse (Eds.), Proceedings of Neural Networks in Applications (NN’99), Logisch GmbH, Magdeburg, Germany, 1999, pp. 47–52.
  42. Kumar, 2006, A robust design criterion for interpretable fuzzy models with uncertain data, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Systems, 14, 314, 10.1109/TFUZZ.2005.861614 · doi:10.1109/tfuzz.2005.861614
  43. Laha, 2001, Some novel classifiers designed using prototypes extracted by a new scheme based on self-organizing feature map, IEEE Trans. Systems Man Cybernet. and Cybernet. B, 31, 881, 10.1109/3477.969492 · doi:10.1109/3477.969492
  44. Lotfi, 1996, Interpretation preservation of adaptive fuzzy inference systems, Internat. J. Approx. Reason., 15, 379, 10.1016/S0888-613X(96)00070-9 · doi:10.1016/s0888-613x(96)00070-9
  45. Mamdani, 1974, Applications of fuzzy algorithm for control a simple dynamic plant, Proc. IEEE, 121, 1585
  46. Mamdani, 1976, Advances in the linguistic synthesis of fuzzy controllers, Internat. J. Man Mach. Stud., 8, 669, 10.1016/S0020-7373(76)80028-4 · doi:10.1016/s0020-7373(76)80028-4
  47. Mastorocostas, 2001, A constrained orthogonal least-squares method for generating TSK fuzzy models: application to short-term load forecasting, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 118, 215, 10.1016/S0165-0114(98)00344-3 · doi:10.1016/s0165-0114(98)00344-3
  48. Mencar, 2007, Distinguishability quantification of fuzzy sets, Inform. Sci., 177, 130, 10.1016/j.ins.2006.04.008 · doi:10.1016/j.ins.2006.04.008
  49. C. Mencar, G. Castellano, A.M. Fanelli, A. Bargiela, Similarity vs. possibility in measuring fuzzy sets distinguishability, in: Proc. Fifth Internat. Conf. on Recent Advances in Soft Computing (RASC), Nottingham, UK, 2004, pp. 354–359.
  50. D. Nauck, R. Kruse, A neuro-fuzzy approach to obtain interpretable fuzzy systems for function approximation, in: Proc. IEEE Internat. Conf. on Fuzzy Systems (FUZZ-IEEE), Anchorage, AK, May 4–9, 1998, pp. 1106–1111. · doi:10.1109/fuzzy.1998.686273
  51. O. Nelles, Nonlinear system identification with local linear neuro-fuzzy models, Ph.D. Thesis, Darmstadt University, Darmstadt, Germany, 1999.
  52. Nelles, 2000, Comparison of two construction algorithms for Takagi-Sugeo fuzzy models, Internat. J. Appl. Math. Comput. Sci., 10, 835
  53. O. Nelles, R. Isermann, Basis function networks for interpolation of local linear models, in: Proc. IEEE Conf. on Decision and Control (CDC), Kobe, Japan, 1996, pp. 470–475. · doi:10.1109/cdc.1996.574356
  54. Pal, 2001, Fuzzy rule extraction from ID3-type decision trees for real data, IEEE Trans. Systems Man Cybernet. Part B, 31, 745, 10.1109/3477.956036 · doi:10.1109/3477.956036
  55. Pedrycz, 1996, Optimization of fuzzy models, IEEE Trans. Systems Man Cybernet. Part B, 26, 627, 10.1109/3477.517038 · doi:10.1109/3477.517038
  56. A. Riid, Transparent fuzzy systems: modelling and control, Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Computer Control, Tallinn Technical University, Estonia, 2002.
  57. A. Riid, R. Isotamm, E. Rustern, Transparent analysis of first-order Takagi–Sugeno systems, in: Proc. 10th Internat. Symp. on System-Modelling-Control, Zakopane, Poland, 2001, pp. 165–170.
  58. A. Riid, E. Rustern, Transparent fuzzy systems and modelling with transparency protection, in: Proc. IFAC Symp. on Artificial Intelligence in Real Time Control, Budapest, 2000, pp. 229–234.
  59. Rojas, 2000, Self-organized fuzzy system generation from training examples, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Systems, 8, 23, 10.1109/91.824763 · doi:10.1109/91.824763
  60. Roubos, 2001, Compact and transparent fuzzy models and classifiers through iterative complexity reduction, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Systems, 9, 516, 10.1109/91.940965 · doi:10.1109/91.940965
  61. Roubos, 2003, Comments on the benchmarks in ‘a proposal for improving the accuracy of linguistic modelling’ and related articles, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Systems, 11, 861, 10.1109/TFUZZ.2003.819822 · doi:10.1109/tfuzz.2003.819822
  62. Roubos, 2003, Learning fuzzy classification rules from labeled data, Inform. Sci., 150, 77, 10.1016/S0020-0255(02)00369-9 · doi:10.1016/s0020-0255(02)00369-9
  63. Setnes, 2001, Rule base reduction: some comments on the use of orthogonal transforms, IEEE Trans. Systems Man Cybernet. Part C, 31, 199, 10.1109/5326.941843 · doi:10.1109/5326.941843
  64. Setnes, 1998, Similarity measures in fuzzy rule base simplification, IEEE Trans. Systems Man Cybernet. Part B, 28, 376, 10.1109/3477.678632 · doi:10.1109/3477.678632
  65. M. Setnes, H. Hellendoorn, Orthogonal transforms for ordering and reduction of fuzzy rules, Proc. Ninth IEEE Internat. Conf. on Fuzzy Systems, San Antonio, USA, 2000, pp. 700–705. · doi:10.1109/fuzzy.2000.839117
  66. Q. Shen, J.G. Marin-Blazquez, Microtuning of membership functions: accuracy vs. interpretability, in: Proc. IEEE Internat. Conf. on Fuzzy Systems (FUZZ-IEEE’02), Honolulu, Hawai, USA, 2002, pp. 168–173.
  67. Silipo, 2000, Input features’ impact on fuzzy decision processes, IEEE Trans. Systems Man Cybernet. Part B, 30, 821, 10.1109/3477.891144 · doi:10.1109/3477.891144
  68. Taniguchi, 1980, On the selection of the order of the spectral density of a stationary process, Ann. Instit. Statist. Math., 32, 401, 10.1007/BF02480345 · doi:10.1007/bf02480345
  69. Van Broekhoven, 2007, Interpretability-preserving genetic optimization of linguistic terms in fuzzy models for fuzzy ordered classification: an ecological case study, Internat. J. Approx. Reason., 44, 65, 10.1016/j.ijar.2006.03.003 · doi:10.1016/j.ijar.2006.03.003
  70. Wang, 2005, Agent-based evolutionary approach to interpretable rule-based knowledge extraction, IEEE Trans. Systems Man Cybernet. Part C, 29, 143, 10.1109/TSMCC.2004.841910 · doi:10.1109/tsmcc.2004.841910
  71. Wang, 1995, Building Sugeno-type models using fuzzy discretization and orthogonal parameter estimation techniques, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Systems, 3, 454, 10.1109/91.481954 · doi:10.1109/91.481954
  72. Yen, 1998, Application of statistical information criteria for optimal fuzzy model construction, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Systems, 6, 362, 10.1109/91.705503 · doi:10.1109/91.705503
  73. Yen, 1998, Improving the interpretability of TSK fuzzy models by combining global learning and local learning, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Systems, 6, 530, 10.1109/91.728447 · doi:10.1109/91.728447
  74. Zadeh, 1996, Fuzzy logic and the calculi of fuzzy rules and fuzzy graphs: a précis, Internat. J. Multiple-Valued Logic, 1, 1
  75. Zhou, 2004, An unsupervised kernel based fuzzy c-means clustering algorithm with kernel normalization, Internat. J. Comput. Intell. Appl., 4, 355, 10.1142/S1469026804001379 · doi:10.1142/s1469026804001379
  76. Zhou, 2006, Constructing accurate and parsimonious fuzzy models with distinguishable fuzzy sets based on an entropy measure, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 157, 1057, 10.1016/j.fss.2005.08.004 · doi:10.1016/j.fss.2005.08.004
  77. Zhou, 2007, Constructing parsimonious fuzzy classifiers based on L2-SVM in high-dimensional space with automatic model selection and fuzzy rule ranking, IEEE Trans. on Fuzzy Systems, 15, 398, 10.1109/TFUZZ.2006.882464 · doi:10.1109/tfuzz.2006.882464

Cited by

See all 269

Metadata

Authors
Zhou, S.-M., & Gan, J. Q.
Venue
Fuzzy Sets and Systems
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-12
Volume
159
Issue
23
Pages
3091-3131
ISSN
0165-0114 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.fss.2008.05.016
OpenAlex
W2016563381
Cited by
269
References
125
FWCI
30.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Low-level interpretability and high-level interpretability: a unified view of data-driven interpretable fuzzy system modelling. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.fss.2008.05.016
The paper
Zhou, S.-M., & Gan, J. Q. (2008). Low-level interpretability and high-level interpretability: a unified view of data-driven interpretable fuzzy system modelling. Fuzzy Sets and Systems. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fss.2008.05.016

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.