The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Selective transport of CO2, CH4, and N2 in coals: insights from modeling of experimental gas adsorption data
Abstract
Selective adsorption and transport of gases in coal are important for natural gas recovery and carbon sequestration in depleted coal seams for environmental remediation. Gases are stored in coal mainly in the adsorbed state. In this study, the interaction energies of adsorbates (CO2, CH4, and N2) and micropores with various widths are investigated using a slit-shape pore model. The experimental adsorption rate data of the three gases conducted on the same coal sample are numerically simulated using a bidisperse model and apparent diffusivities of each adsorbate in the macropore and micropore are determined. The results indicate that the relative adsorbate molecule size and pore structure play an important role in selective gas adsorption and diffusion in micropores. Generally, the microporous coals diffusion is activated and the apparent micropore diffusivities of gases in coal decrease strongly with increase in gas kinetic diameters. Apparent micropore diffusivity of CO2 is generally one or two order of magnitude higher than those of CH4 and N2 because their kinetic diameters have the relation: CO2 (0.33 nm)<N2 (0.36 nm)<CH4 (0.38 nm). In contrast to theoretical values, apparent macropore diffusivity of CO2 is also larger than those of CH4 and N2, suggesting that coal has an interconnected pore network but highly constricted by ultra micropores with width <∼0.6 nm. It is also found that the apparent diffusivity strongly decreases with an increase in gas pressure, which may be attributed to coal matrix swelling caused by gas adsorption. Therefore, rigorous modeling of gas recovery and production requires consideration of specific interaction of gas and coal matrix.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Porous Carbons: Structure‐Oriented Design and Versatile Applications
Tian, W., Zhang, H., Duan, X., Sun, H., Shao, G., & Wang, S. (2020) · Advanced Functional Materials · doi:10.1002/adfm.201909265 · Cited by 657
Porosity of Coal and Shale: Insights from Gas Adsorption and SANS/USANS Techniques
Mastalerz, M., He, L., Melnichenko, Y. B., & Rupp, J. A. (2012) · Energy & Fuels · doi:10.1021/ef300735t · Cited by 526
Gas diffusion behavior of coal and its impact on production from coalbed methane reservoirs
Pillalamarry, M., Harpalani, S., & Liu, S. (2011) · International Journal of Coal Geology · doi:10.1016/j.coal.2011.03.007 · Cited by 502
A review of experimental research on Enhanced Coal Bed Methane (ECBM) recovery via CO2 sequestration
Mukherjee, M., & Misra, S. (2018) · Earth-Science Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2018.02.018 · Cited by 339
Impact of mass balance calculations on adsorption capacities in microporous shale gas reservoirs
Ross, D. J. K., & Marc Bustin, R. (2007) · Fuel · doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2007.02.036 · Cited by 306
Metadata
- Authors
- Cui, X., Bustin, R. M., & Dipple, G.
- Venue
- Fuel
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2004-02
- Volume
- 83
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 293-303
- ISSN
- 0016-2361 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2029463552
- Cited by
- 536
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 15.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Selective transport of CO2, CH4, and N2 in coals: insights from modeling of experimental gas adsorption data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.fuel.2003.09.001
- The paper
- Cui, X., Bustin, R. M., & Dipple, G. (2004). Selective transport of CO2, CH4, and N2 in coals: insights from modeling of experimental gas adsorption data. Fuel. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2003.09.001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.