Cited by 319Thermochemical Biomass Conversion ProcessesCoal Combustion and Slurry ProcessingForest Biomass Utilization and Management

An investigation of the grindability of two torrefied energy crops

Bridgeman, T.G., Jones, J.M., Williams, A., Waldron, D.J.·2010·Fuel

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.fuel.2010.06.043

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The decrease in fibrous nature of torrefied biomass produces more spherical and isolated particles when ground, improving co-milling and blending with coal and increasing co-firing potential in coal-fired power plants.

    “The decrease in the fibrous nature of the torrefied biomass produces more spherical and isolated particles when grinded.This improves in the co-milling and blending of biomass with coal, and then increases the co-firing potential of biomass in coalfired power plants (Bridgeman et al., 2010).”

    From A Comprehensive Review on Biomass Torrefaction (2014) · cites this paper as Bridgeman et al., 2010

    The Abstract (p. 2) says torrefaction reduces biomass’s fibrous nature and could permit higher co-milling and co-firing rates in coal-fired power stations. The Introduction (p. 4) mentions more uniform particle shape, but the cited paper does not establish that grinding produces spherical, isolated particles or that those shapes improve blending with coal. It also presents the co-firing benefit as a possibility, not a demonstrated result. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. [11]11. Unsworth J. F.; Barratt D. J.; Roberts P. T., Coal quality and combustion performance: an international perspective, Shell Research Ltd, Thornton res. cent., Chester CH1 3SH, Coal science and technology, 1991, vol. 19, 1-609.
  2. [12]12. R.M. Hardgrove, Grindability of Coal. Trans. ASME, Fuels and Steam Power, 54 (1932), p 37-46.
  3. [13]13. Sengupta, A. N., An assessment of grindability index of coal. Fuel Processing Technology, 76(1), 2002, p1-10.
  4. [15]15. Prins, M. J., Ptasinski, K. J. and Janssen, F. J. J. G. (2006). More efficient biomass gasification via torrefaction. Energy 31(15), 3458-3470.
  5. [16]16. Howard A. Strobel, William R. Heineman, Chemical Instrumentation: A Systematic Approach, 3rd Edition, Wiley, 1989.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bridgeman, T. G., Jones, J. M., Williams, A., & Waldron, D. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Leeds (GB)
  • Alstom (United Kingdom) (GB)
Corresponding author
Jones, J.M.
Venue
Fuel
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-12
Volume
89
Issue
12
Pages
3911-3918
ISSN
0016-2361 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2131936566
Cited by
319
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 30 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 22
FWCI
10.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Fuel (publishedVersion)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/E039995/1)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Coal Combustion and Slurry Processing
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanics of Materials › Forest Biomass Utilization and Management
Keywords
torrefaction, grindability, willow, Miscanthus, energy crops, Hardgrove grindability index, co-combustion, co-milling, torrefied biomass, particle size distribution, torrefaction temperature, residence time, calorific value

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review