Cited by 377Thermochemical Biomass Conversion ProcessesBiofuel production and bioconversionForest Biomass Utilization and Management

Effects of torrefaction process parameters on biomass feedstock upgrading

Medic, D., Darr, M., Shah, A., Potter, B., Zimmerman, J.·2012·Fuel

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.fuel.2011.07.019

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Medic, D., Darr, M., Shah, A., Potter, B., & Zimmerman, J.
Affiliations
Iowa State University (US)
Corresponding author
Medic, D.
Venue
Fuel
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-01
Volume
91
Issue
1
Pages
147-154
ISSN
0016-2361 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2055748013
Cited by
377
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 37 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 35 · 2017: 35 · 2016: 31 · 2015: 33 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 22
FWCI
14.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Fuel (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Breast Cancer Research Foundation
  • ConocoPhillips
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Biofuel production and bioconversion
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanics of Materials › Forest Biomass Utilization and Management
Keywords
torrefaction, biomass valorization, corn stover, biomass pretreatment, energy density, moisture content, processing temperature, reaction time (chemistry), mass and energy balance, lignocellulosic biomass, agricultural residues, autothermal operation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review