The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Pyrolysis gases produced from individual and mixed PE, PP, PS, PVC, and PET—Part I: Production and physical properties
Abstract
Abstract This article describes the production and properties of gases produced by the pyrolyses of poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET), polypropylene (PP), polyethylene (PE), poly(vinyl chloride) (PVC), and polystyrene (PS), and three of their mixtures at process temperatures of 500, 700, and 900 °C. The overall aim was to characterize all 24 gases in terms of their production and physical properties, and compare the data obtained to those of traditional fuels, namely natural gas (NG) and propane. In addition to experimental and analytical approaches for determining quantities and compositions of the pyrolysis products, various mathematical methods and their combinations were also used to determine product properties. The highest conversion of material into gas occurred during the pyrolysis of PP at 900 °C (66.88 wt% conversion into gaseous products). The pyrolyses of PE and PP at 500 °C were found to generate pyrolysis gases with the highest energy, with gross calorific values of 86.58 and 81.09 MJ m−3N, respectively. The highest chemical energy yield was obtained by the pyrolysis of PP at 900 °C. Gases produced from PVC had a high thermal conductivity of about 104.83 mW m−1 K−1. The gas generated from PP at 500 °C exhibited a high specific heat of 2.94 kJ m−3N K−1, and that obtained from PS at 500 °C had a very low kinematic viscosity (5.28 10−6 m2 s−1) and thermal diffusivity (7.90 10−6 m2 s−1). Even though numerous reports have dealt with pyrolysis gases, there is still not sufficient information about the specific physical properties of these gases. This article attempts to fill this gap and induce scientific interest in this field.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Recycling of Bioplastics: Routes and Benefits
Lamberti, F. M., Román-Ramírez, L. A., & Wood, J. (2020) · Journal of Polymers and the Environment · doi:10.1007/s10924-020-01795-8 · Cited by 365
Recent Progress in the Chemical Upcycling of Plastic Wastes
Chen, X., Wang, Y., & Zhang, L. (2021) · ChemSusChem · doi:10.1002/cssc.202100868 · Cited by 298
Cai, N., Li, X., Xia, S., Sun, L., Hu, J., Bartocci, P., Fantozzi, F., Williams, P. T., Yang, H., & Chen, H. (2021) · Energy Conversion and Management · doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2020.113794 · Cited by 253
van Akker, M., Strien, J. R. J., Genuino, H. C., van Eijk, M. C. P., Schenk, N. J., Heeres, H. J., & Deuss, P. J. (2025) · Energy & Fuels · doi:10.1021/acs.energyfuels.4c05631 · Cited by 25
Veksha, A., Lu, J., Tsakadze, Z., Chen, W., & Lisak, G. (2024) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.142074 · Cited by 15
Metadata
- Authors
- Honus, S., Kumagai, S., Fedorko, G., Molnár, V., & Yoshioka, T.
- Venue
- Fuel
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-06
- Volume
- 221
- Pages
- 346-360
- ISSN
- 0016-2361 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2792487819
- Cited by
- 187
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pyrolysis gases produced from individual and mixed PE, PP, PS, PVC, and PET—Part I: Production and physical properties. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.fuel.2018.02.074
- The paper
- Honus, S., Kumagai, S., Fedorko, G., Molnár, V., & Yoshioka, T. (2018). Pyrolysis gases produced from individual and mixed PE, PP, PS, PVC, and PET—Part I: Production and physical properties. Fuel. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2018.02.074
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.