To what extent could biochar replace coal and coke in steel industries?
Open accessAbstract
The iron and steel making is considered among the biggest industries which run the world. This industry contributes around 20% of global industrial-sector energy consumption that is provided significantly by coal and coke. The fossil-based fuels are consumed largely for heat generation and reducing agents in steel production processes which leads to huge global CO2 emissions. This matter encourages to find an effective, environmentally friendly, and sustainable substitute instead of coke and coal. Recently, biochar has received lots of consideration as a possible replace since the acceptable adaptation and comparable metallurgical properties to coal and coke. However, the biomass application in iron and steel making manufactures is currently limited and it endures strong competition with coal-based fuels. This paper investigates the key challenges affected on the steel production plant and the ability of biochar to overcome these difficulties. This work evaluates coal and coke substitution with biochar, focusing on metallurgical, technical and environmental aspects with the view of gate-to-gate analysis, from industry entry gate (input feedstocks that are coal or biochar) to exit gate (that is steel production). Moreover, the opportunities and obstacles of biochar performance in energy-intensive processes in steel production such as coke-making, sintering and blast furnace are discussed and finally, the main questions regarding the evaluation of these alternatives and their impacts on the system are answered.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The higher HHV of B600, B800, and HTB800 indicates enhanced fuel efficiency.
“indicating enhanced fuel efficiency [68].”
From Pilot-Scale Slow Pyrolysis, Post-Heat Treatment, and Self-Heating Performance of Biochar Fuels Derived from Construction, Renovation, and Demolition (CRD) Wood Waste (2026) · cites this paper as [68]
Section 2.1 (p. 4) treats higher calorific value as a desirable fuel property when assessing whether biochar can replace coal or coke. It does not discuss B600, B800, or HTB800, or establish that their higher HHV improves fuel efficiency; calorific value alone is not a measure of conversion efficiency. (LLM, conf=0.78)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Influence of feedstock source and pyrolysis temperature on biochar bulk and surface properties
Suliman, W., Harsh, J. B., Abu-Lail, N. I., Fortuna, A.-M., Dallmeyer, I., & Garcia-Perez, M. (2016) · Biomass and Bioenergy · doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2015.11.010 · Cited by 585 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 67
- [1][1] [Safarian S, Unnthorsson R, Richter C. Techno-economic analysis of power production by using waste biomass gasification. J Power Energy Eng 2020;8(06):1.](http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0016-2361(23)00014-5/h0005) -
- [2][2] Safarianbana S, Unnthorsson R, Richter C. Development of a new stoichiometric equilibrium-based model for wood chips and mixed paper wastes gasification by ASPEN Plus. ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition. 59438. American Society of Mechanical Engineers; 2019:V006T06A2. -
- [3][3] [Safarian S, Unnthorsson R, Richter C. The equivalence of stoichiometric and nonstoichiometric methods for modeling gasification and other reaction equilibria. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2020;131:109982.](http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0016-2361(23)00014-5/h0015) -
- [5][5] [Valavanidis A. The shift to diesel fuel engines and how the emission scandal of diesel vehicles unfolded. World Energy Consump Transp Sect 2018;1:1 -26.](http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0016-2361(23)00014-5/h0025) -
- [6][6] [Ren L, Zhou S, Peng T, Ou X. A review of CO2 emissions reduction technologies and low-carbon development in the iron and steel industry focusing on China. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2021;143:110846.](http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0016-2361(23)00014-5/h0030) -
- [8][8] [Holappa L. A general vision for reduction of energy consumption and CO2 emissions from the steel industry. Metals 2020;10(9):1117.](http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0016-2361(23)00014-5/h0040) -
- [10][10] [Dnv. ENERGY TRANSITION OUTLOOK 2022: A global and regional forecast to 2050. Norway: DNV AS; 2022.](http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0016-2361(23)00014-5/h0050) -
- [12][12] Khanna R, Li K, Wang Z, Sun M, Zhang J, Mukherjee PS. Biochars in iron and steel industries. Char and Carbon Materials Derived from Biomass. Elsevier; 2019, p. 429-46. -
- [13][13] [Ye L, Peng Z, Wang L, Anzulevich A, Bychkov I, Kalganov D, et al. Use of biochar for sustainable ferrous metallurgy. JOM 2019;71(11):3931 -40.](http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0016-2361(23)00014-5/h0065) -
- [14][14] [Dilmaç ¨ OF, Dilmac N, Doruk ET. Performance of electric arc furnace slag as oxygen carrier in chemical-looping combustion process. Fuel 2020;265:117014.](http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0016-2361(23)00014-5/h0070) -
- [15][15] [Behera P, Bhoi B, Paramguru R, Mukherjee P, Mishra B. Hydrogen plasma smelting reduction of Fe2O3. Metall Mater Trans B 2019;50(1):262 -70.](http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0016-2361(23)00014-5/h0075) -
- [16][16] Meier T. Modellierung und Simulation des Elektrolichtbogenofens (Dissertation). Faculty of Georessources and Materials Engineering, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany 2016. -
- [17][17] [Hay T, Visuri V-V, Aula M, Echterhof T. A review of mathematical process models for the electric arc furnace process. Steel Res Int 2021;92(3):2000395.](http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0016-2361(23)00014-5/h0085) -
- [18][18] [Burchart-Korol D. Life cycle assessment of steel production in Poland: a case study. J Clean Prod 2013;54:235 -43.](http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0016-2361(23)00014-5/h0090) -
- [19][19] [Safarian S, Unnthorsson R, Richter C. Simulation of small-scale waste biomass gasification integrated power production: a comparative performance analysis for timber and wood waste. Int J Appl Power Eng (IJAPE) 2020;09(02):147 -52.](http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0016-2361(23)00014-5/h0095) -
- [20][20] [Safarian S, Unnthorsson R, Richter C. Hydrogen production via biomass gasification: simulation and performance analysis under different gasifying agents. Biofuels 2021:1 -10.](http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0016-2361(23)00014-5/h0100) -
- [21][21] [Safarian S, Bararzadeh M. Exergy analysis of high-performance cycles for gas turbine with air-bottoming. J Mech Eng Res 2012;5(2):38 -49.](http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0016-2361(23)00014-5/h0105) -
- [22][22] [Safarian S, Unnthorsson R, Richter C. Performance analysis of power generation by wood and woody biomass gasification in a downdraft gasifier. J Appl Power Eng 2021;10:80 -8.](http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0016-2361(23)00014-5/h0110) -
- [23][23] [Wijayanta AT, Alam MS, Nakaso K, Fukai J, Kunitomo K, Shimizu M. Combustibility of biochar injected into the raceway of a blast furnace. Fuel Process Technol 2014;117:53 -9.](http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0016-2361(23)00014-5/h0115) -
- [24][24] [Wijayanta AT, Alam MS, Nakaso K, Fukai J, Kunitomo K, Shimizu M. Numerical study on pulverized biochar injection in blast furnace. ISIJ Int 2014;54(7):1521 -9.](http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0016-2361(23)00014-5/h0120) -
- [25][25] [Cardarelli A, De Santis M, Cirilli F, Barbanera M. Computational fluid dynamics analysis of biochar combustion in a simulated ironmaking electric arc furnace. Fuel 2022;328:125267.](http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0016-2361(23)00014-5/h0125) S. Safarian -
- [26][26] [Safarian S, Ryd ´ en M, Janssen M. Development and Comparison of Thermodynamic Equilibrium and Kinetic Approaches for Biomass Pyrolysis Modeling. Energies 2022;15(11):3999.](http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0016-2361(23)00014-5/h0130) -
- [27][27] [Ning X, Liang W, Wang G, Xu R, Wang P, Zhang J, et al. Effect of pyrolysis temperature on blast furnace injection performance of biochar. Fuel 2022;313: 122648.](http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0016-2361(23)00014-5/h0135) -
- [28][28] [Renzulli PA, Notarnicola B, Tassielli G, Arcese G, Di Capua R. Life cycle assessment of steel produced in an Italian integrated steel mill. Sustainability 2016;8(8):719.](http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0016-2361(23)00014-5/h0140) -
- [29][29] [Jeffery J, Vay J. Iron and Steel Industry Particulate Emissions: Source Category Report. Iron Steel 1986;5:33 -100.](http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0016-2361(23)00014-5/h0145) -
- [30][30] [Zervas T, McMullan J, Williams B. Developments in iron and steel making. Int J Energy Res 1996;20(1):69 -91.](http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0016-2361(23)00014-5/h0150) -
- [31][31] [Mathieson JG, Rogers H, Somerville M, Ridgeway P, Jahanshahi S. Use of biomass in the iron and steel industry -an Australian perspective. EECR-METEC InSteelCon 2011:1.](http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0016-2361(23)00014-5/h0155) -
- [32][32] [Pardo N, Moya JA. Prospective scenarios on energy efficiency and CO2 emissions in the European Iron & Steel industry. Energy 2013;54:113 -28.](http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0016-2361(23)00014-5/h0160) -
- [33][33] [Suopaj ¨ arvi H, Umeki K, Mousa E, Hedayati A, Romar H, Kemppainen A, et al. Use of biomass in integrated steelmaking -Status quo, future needs and comparison to other low-CO2 steel production technologies. Appl Energy 2018;213:384 -407.](http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0016-2361(23)00014-5/h0165) -
- [34][34] Babich A, Senk D. Biomass use in the steel industry: back to the future. Stahl Eisen 2013;133(5):57 -67. -
- [35][35] [Motta IL, Miranda NT, Maciel Filho R, Maciel MRW. Biomass gasification in fluidized beds: A review of biomass moisture content and operating pressure effects. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2018;94:998 -1023.](http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0016-2361(23)00014-5/h0175) -
- [36][36] [Delgado R, Rosas JG, G ´ omez N, Martínez O, Sanchez ME, Cara J. Energy valorisation of crude glycerol and corn straw by means of slow co-pyrolysis: production and characterisation of gas, char and bio-oil. Fuel 2013;112:31 -7.](http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0016-2361(23)00014-5/h0180) -
- [37][37] [Halim SA, Swithenbank J. Characterisation of Malaysian wood pellets and rubberwood using slow pyrolysis and microwave technology. J Anal Appl Pyrol 2016;122:64 -75.](http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0016-2361(23)00014-5/h0185) -
- [38][38] [Farrokh NT, Suopaj ¨ arvi H, Mattila O, Umeki K, Phounglamcheik A, Romar H, et al. Slow pyrolysis of by-product lignin from wood-based ethanol production -A detailed analysis of the produced chars. Energy 2018;164:112 -23.](http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0016-2361(23)00014-5/h0190) -
- [39][39] [Gupta S, Gupta GK, Mondal MK. Slow pyrolysis of chemically treated walnut shell for valuable products: Effect of process parameters and in-depth product analysis. Energy 2019;181:665 -76.](http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0016-2361(23)00014-5/h0195) -
- [40][40] [Shin J-H, Lee L-S, Lee S-H. Economic Assessment of a Indirect Liquefaction Process Using a Gasification with Petroleum Coke/coal Mixtures. Korean Chem Eng Res 2016;54(4):501 -9.](http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0016-2361(23)00014-5/h0200) -
- [41][41] [Borah D, Baruah M, Haque I. Oxidation of high sulphur coal. Part 1. Desulphurisation and evidence of the formation of oxidised organic sulphur species. Fuel 2001;80(4):501 -7.](http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0016-2361(23)00014-5/h0205) -
- [42][42] [Li S, Chan CY, Sharbatmaleki M, Trejo H, Delagah S. Engineered Biochar Production and Its Potential Benefits in a Closed-Loop Water-Reuse Agriculture System. Water 2020;12(10):2847.](http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0016-2361(23)00014-5/h0210) -
- [44][44] [Laghari M, Hu Z, Mirjat MS, Xiao B, Tagar AA, Hu M. Fast pyrolysis biochar from sawdust improves the quality of desert soils and enhances plant growth. J Sci Food Agric 2016;96(1):199 -206.](http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0016-2361(23)00014-5/h0220) -
- [45][45] [Enaime G, Bacaoui A, Yaacoubi A, Lübken M. Biochar for wastewater treatment -conversion technologies and applications. Appl Sci 2020;10(10):3492.](http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0016-2361(23)00014-5/h0225) -
- [46][46] [Safarian S, Unnthorsson R, Richter C. Simulation and performance analysis of integrated gasification -syngas fermentation plant for lignocellulosic ethanol production. Fermentation 2020;6(3):68.](http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0016-2361(23)00014-5/h0230) -
- [48][48] [Safarian S, Ebrahimi Saryazdi SM, Unnthorsson R, Richter C. Gasification of Woody Biomasses and Forestry Residues: Simulation, Performance Analysis, and Environmental Impact. Fermentation 2021;7(2):61.](http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0016-2361(23)00014-5/h0240) -
- [49][49] [Chi NTL, Anto S, Ahamed TS, Kumar SS, Shanmugam S, Samuel MS, et al. A review on biochar production techniques and biochar based catalyst for biofuel production from algae. Fuel 2021;287:119411.](http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0016-2361(23)00014-5/h0245) -
- [50][50] [Many ` a JJ, Azuara M, Manso JA. Biochar production through slow pyrolysis of different biomass materials: Seeking the best operating conditions. Biomass Bioenergy 2018;117:115 -23.](http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0016-2361(23)00014-5/h0250) -
- [51][51] [Hernandez-Mena LE, P ´ ecoraa A, Beraldob AL. Slow pyrolysis of bamboo biomass: analysis of biochar properties. Chem Eng 2014;37.](http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0016-2361(23)00014-5/h0255) -
- [52][52] [Sohi S, Lopez-Capel E, Krull E, Bol R. Biochar ' s roles in soil and climate change: A review of research needs. CSIRO Land Water Sci Rep 2009;5(09):1 -57.](http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0016-2361(23)00014-5/h0260) -
- [53][53] [Duku MH, Gu S, Hagan EB. Biochar production potential in Ghana -A review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2011;15(8):3539 -51.](http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0016-2361(23)00014-5/h0265) -
- [54][54] [Wang D, Jiang P, Zhang H, Yuan W. Biochar production and applications in agro and forestry systems: A review. Sci Total Environ 2020;723:137775.](http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0016-2361(23)00014-5/h0270) -
- [55][55] [Weinstetn M, Broido A. Pyrolysis-crystallinity relationships in cellulose. Combust Sci Technol 1970;1(4):287 -92.](http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0016-2361(23)00014-5/h0275) -
- [56][56] [Dıez M, Alvarez R, Barriocanal C. Coal for metallurgical coke production: predictions of coke quality and future requirements for cokemaking. Int J Coal Geol 2002;50(1 -4):389 -412.](http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0016-2361(23)00014-5/h0280) -
- [57][57] Schwarz M, Babich A, Senk D, Sadiku V, Gbadebo P. Usage of biomass in Cokemaking. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Process Development in Iron and Steelmaking (SCANMET V), Luleå, Sweden. 2016:12-5. -
- [58][58] [Kumar PP, Barman S, Singh S, Ranjan M. Influence of coal fluidity on coal blend and coke quality. Ironmak Steelmak 2008;35(6):416 -20.](http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0016-2361(23)00014-5/h0290) -
- [59][59] [Guerrero A, Diez MA, Borrego AG. Influence of charcoal fines on the thermoplastic properties of coking coals and the optical properties of the semicoke. Int J Coal Geol 2015;147:105 -14.](http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0016-2361(23)00014-5/h0295) -
- [60][60] [Diez M, Alvarez R, Fern ´ andez M. Biomass derived products as modifiers of the rheological properties of coking coals. Fuel 2012;96:306 -13.](http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0016-2361(23)00014-5/h0300) -
- [61][61] [Mathieson JG, Rogers H, Somerville MA, Jahanshahi S, Ridgeway P. Potential for the use of biomass in the iron and steel industry. Proc Chem 2011:18 -21.](http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0016-2361(23)00014-5/h0305) -
- [62][62] Ng KW, Giroux L, MacPhee T, Todoschuk T. Incorporation of charcoal in coking coal blend-A study of the effects on carbonization conditions and coke quality. Proceedings of the AISTech 2012:225-36. -
- [63][63] Kawaguchi T, Hara M. Utilization of biomass for iron ore sintering. ISIJ Int 2013;53 (9):1599 -606. -
- [64][64] [Suopaj ¨ arvi H, Dahl E, Kemppainen A, Gornostayev S, Koskela A, Fabritius T. Effect of charcoal and Kraft-lignin addition on coke compression strength and reactivity. Energies 2017;10(11):1850.](http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0016-2361(23)00014-5/h0320) -
- [65][65] [Gu F, Zhang Y, Li G, Zhong Q, Luo J, Su Z, et al. Effective preparation of blast furnace burdens from superfine iron concentrates by composite agglomeration process. Ironmak Steelmak 2020;47(8):908 -14.](http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0016-2361(23)00014-5/h0325) -
- [66][66] [Fan X, Ji Z, Gan M, Chen X, Yin L, Jiang T. Characteristics of prepared coke -biochar composite and its influence on reduction of NOx emission in iron ore sintering. ISIJ Int 2015;55(3):521 -7.](http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0016-2361(23)00014-5/h0330) -
- [67][67] [Lu L, Adam M, Kilburn M, Hapugoda S, Somerville M, Jahanshahi S, et al. Substitution of charcoal for coke breeze in iron ore sintering. ISIJ Int 2013;53(9): 1607 -16.](http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0016-2361(23)00014-5/h0335) -
- [68][68] [Gan M, Fan X, Chen X, Ji Z, Lv W, Wang Y, et al. Reduction of pollutant emission in iron ore sintering process by applying biomass fuels. ISIJ Int 2012;52(9):1574 -8.](http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0016-2361(23)00014-5/h0340) -
- [69][69] [Mousa E, Babich A, Senk D. Iron ore sintering process with biomass utilization. In: Proceedings of the METEC and 2nd European Steel Technology and Application Days Conference (METEC and 2nd ESTAD); 2015. p. 1 -13.](http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0016-2361(23)00014-5/h0345) -
- [73][73] NOLDIN J. Energy efficiency and CO2 reduction in the Brazil steel industry. METEC InsteelCon 2011, 1 st International Conference on Energy Efficiency and CO2 Reduction in the Steel Industry. 2011. -
- [74][74] [Fick G, Mirgaux O, Neau P, Patisson F. Using biomass for pig iron production: A technical, environmental and economical assessment. Waste Biomass Valoriz 2014; 5(1):43 -55.](http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0016-2361(23)00014-5/h0370) -
- [76][76] [Wang C, Larsson M, L ¨ ovgren J, Nilsson L, Mellin P, Yang W, et al. Injection of solid biomass products into the blast furnace and its potential effects on an integrated steel plant. Energy Proc 2014;61:2184 -7.](http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0016-2361(23)00014-5/h0380) -
- [77][77] [Wang C, Mellin P, L ¨ ovgren J, Nilsson L, Yang W, Salman H, et al. Biomass as blast furnace injectant -Considering availability, pretreatment and deployment in the Swedish steel industry. Energ Conver Manage 2015;102:217 -26.](http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0016-2361(23)00014-5/h0385) -
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Emerging applications of biochar: A review on techno-environmental-economic aspects
Zhu, H., An, Q., Syafika Mohd Nasir, A., Babin, A., Lucero Saucedo, S., Vallenas, A., Li, L., Baldwin, S. A., Lau, A., & Bi, X. (2023) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2023.129745 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
Ganesan, A., Barnabé, S., Langlois, S., Rezazgui, O., Bareha, Y., & Boussabbeh, C. (2026) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en19133097 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Safarian, S.
- Affiliations
- Chalmers University of Technology (SE)
- Corresponding author
- Safarian, Sahar
- ORCID
- Safarian, Sahar
- Venue
- Fuel
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2023-05
- Volume
- 339
- Pages
- 127401
- ISSN
- 0016-2361 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4315978897
- Cited by
- 113
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 28 · 2025: 42 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 20
- FWCI
- 11.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Fuel (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Chalmers Research (Chalmers University of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Iron and Steelmaking Processes
- Physical Sciences › Energy › Fuel Technology › Coal and Coke Industries Research
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
- Keywords
- biochar, coal substitution, coke substitution, steel industry, gate-to-gate life cycle assessment, coke production, sintering, blast furnace, CO2 emissions, biomass feedstock, metallurgical properties, energy-intensive processes
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review