Cited by 16Food Nutrient Composition and Product DevelopmentFermentation and Sensory AnalysisFood Quality and Safety Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Quality and biological properties of vinegar processed from non-valorized fruits in Southern Portugal

Open access
Silva, Vanessa, Mehrpour, Gisou, Soares, Vera, Santo, David, Nunes, Patrícia, Quintas, Célia·2024·Future Foods

Abstract

The processing of vinegar from non-valorized fruits and agricultural surpluses is an attractive strategy for biomass waste management. The present study aimed to characterize vinegar of fermented fruits, namely fresh fig, plum, dried fig, grape, raspberry, and apricot. Physicochemical and microbial quality, total phenolic content (TPC), total flavonoid content (TFC), total antioxidant capacity (TAC), mineral composition, and antimicrobial capacity against bacteria and yeasts were studied. Grape and apricot vinegar had the highest values of TAC (39.31±0.25, 34.10±1.44 DPPH µg Trolox/100 mL, respectively), while grape contained the highest TFC (35.73±3.86 mg catechin/100 mL) and raspberry and fresh fig, the highest TPC (55.40±1.1, 64.10±0.0 mg gallic acid/100 mL, respectively). Potassium, calcium and sodium were the most abundant minerals in the vinegars with dried fig standing out for its richness in potassium 1223.83±89.48 mg/L, calcium 17.70±1.31 mg/L, magnesium 2.39±0.24 mg/L, and zinc 4.33±0.17 mg/L. The enterobacteria Cronobacter sakazakii and Salmonella Typhimurium were the most tolerant (10.00±0.00-26.39±1.60 mm), while Pseudomonas aeruginosa was the most sensitive bacteria (26.36±3.61-40.17±2.72 mm) as well as Gram + (Staphylococcus aureus, Listeria innocua) (21,20±8,37-31.11±2.41 mm). The acetification processes resulted in vinegars with a good hygienic status, and levels of acetic acid (≥5%) complying with the legislation.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.fufo.2024.100337

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 30 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Bourgeois, 2009, The history of vinegar and of its acetification systems, Arch. Des Sci., 62, 147
  2. Karaagac, 2016, An investigation on antimicrobial and antioxidant activities of naturally produced mulberry vinegar, Pharm. Biol., 6, 34
  3. Panda, 2016, Microbial processing of fruit and vegetable wastes for production of vital enzymes and organic acids, Biotechnol. Environ. Res., 146, 161

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 16

Metadata

Authors
Silva, V., Mehrpour, G., Soares, V., Santo, D., Nunes, P., & Quintas, C.
Affiliations
University of Algarve (PT)
Corresponding author
Quintas, Célia
Venue
Future Foods
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-06
Volume
9
Pages
100337
ISSN
2666-8335 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4393084889
Cited by
13
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 2
FWCI
2.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Future Foods (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (MED/UIDB/05183/2020)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food Nutrient Composition and Product Development
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Fermentation and Sensory Analysis
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food Quality and Safety Studies
Keywords
fruit vinegar, vinegar fermentation, agricultural waste valorization, figs, dried figs, grapes, raspberry, apricot, plum, total phenolic content, total flavonoid content, antioxidant capacity, mineral composition, antimicrobial activity, Cronobacter sakazakii, Salmonella typhimurium, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus, Listeria innocua, acetic acid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review