Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 319

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 163 of the 163 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A review on the catalytic pyrolysis of biomass for the bio-oil production with ZSM-5: Focus on structure

Nishu, Liu, Ronghou, Rahman, Md. Maksudur, Sarker, Manobendro, Chai, Meiyun, Li, Chong, Cai, Junmeng·2020·Fuel Processing Technology

Abstract

Abstract A higher amount of oxygenated compounds in bio-oil obstructs its use in the existing petroleum-based infrastructures. In order to convert oxygenates into hydrocarbons and less reactive compounds, a number of catalysts have been studied in the catalytic fast pyrolysis. The ZSM-5 catalyst has drawn a considerable attention due to its potential to yield high quality bio-oil that is rich in aliphatic and aromatic hydrocarbons and deficient of oxygenating species. This review has focused on shape selectivity of ZSM-5 towards improving the quality of bio-oil from catalytic fast pyrolysis. The uniform pore size, unique channels equipped with elliptical and near-circular openings, mesoporosity, and tunable acidity are considered as the most selective for the production of aromatics and also are responsible for deoxygenation reaction. It has been revealed that pyrolysis intermediates diffuse into ZSM-5 pores and undergo catalytic cracking on the active sites while cleavage of C O and C C bonds releases oxygen and further transformation produces aromatic hydrocarbons and small molecular weight compounds. Furthermore, total acidity and the number of acid sites (Bronsted and Lewis acid) of ZSM-5 can be tuned that is promising rather than other acid catalysts for catalytic fast pyrolysis. At last, the catalytic effects of parent and modified ZSM-5 catalysts have been summarized. This review will carry the potential for the selection of catalyst with better understanding of pore size that will be a forwarding approach in the area of catalytic pyrolysis.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.fuproc.2019.106301

Cites

163 of 163 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 163 references

Cited by

See all 319

Metadata

Authors
Nishu, Liu, R., Rahman, M. M., Sarker, M., Chai, M., Li, C., & Cai, J.
Venue
Fuel Processing Technology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-03
Volume
199
Pages
106301
ISSN
0378-3820 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2989710948
Cited by
319
References
163
FWCI
10.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A review on the catalytic pyrolysis of biomass for the bio-oil production with ZSM-5: Focus on structure. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.fuproc.2019.106301
The paper
Nishu, Liu, R., Rahman, M. M., Sarker, M., Chai, M., Li, C., & Cai, J. (2020). A review on the catalytic pyrolysis of biomass for the bio-oil production with ZSM-5: Focus on structure. Fuel Processing Technology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2019.106301

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.