The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
DEMO design activity in Europe: Progress and updates
Open accessAbstract
This paper describes the progress of the DEMO Design Activities in Europe and particularly the work done to address critical design integration issues that affect the machine configuration and performance, the plant concept layout and the selection of system design and technologies. Work continues to be primarily focused on the design integration of a pulsed baseline DEMO reactor concept, but a number of alternative configurations (e.g., a double-null divertor and a snowflake divertor as well as a ‘flexi’ DEMO that operates initially in an inductively driven pulsed regime, with the possibility to be upgraded to a long-pulse or steady-state machine with a greater reliance on auxiliary current drive, etc.) are under preliminary study, especially to evaluate their DEMO reactor relevance. Some initial considerations are given on the strategy to implement a structured design and technology down-selection, that progressively reviews and narrows options to arrive at the DEMO plant concept that addresses major system integration risks and offers the best probability to satisfy all stakeholder mission requirements. Finally, some recent technical achievements are highlighted.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
ITER: a unique international collaboration to harness the power of the stars
Bigot, B. (2017) · Comptes Rendus Physique · doi:10.1016/j.crhy.2017.09.002 · Cited by 11 · cited 1×
“The most critical and final major validation input, is the demonstration of D-T burning plasma scenarios with Q=10 in ITER that are scheduled to start around 2035, including the results of the TBM programme (short pulse in 2037 and long pulse in 2039) [4].”
Method
Cited by
An overview of the EU breeding blanket design strategy as an integral part of the DEMO design effort
Federici, G., Boccaccini, L., Cismondi, F., Gasparotto, M., Poitevin, Y., & Ricapito, I. (2019) · Fusion Engineering and Design · doi:10.1016/j.fusengdes.2019.01.141 · Cited by 282
Self-citationElectrical loads and power systems for the DEMO nuclear fusion project
Minucci, S., Panella, S., Ciattaglia, S., Falvo, M. C., & Lampasi, A. (2020) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en13092269 · Cited by 28
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Federici, G., Bachmann, C., Barucca, L., Biel, W., Boccaccini, L., Brown, R., Bustreo, C., Ciattaglia, S., Cismondi, F., Coleman, M., Corato, V., Day, C., Diegele, E., Fischer, U., Franke, T., Gliss, C., Ibarra, A., Kembleton, R., Loving, A., Maviglia, F., Meszaros, B., Pintsuk, G., Taylor, N., Tran, M. Q., Vorpahl, C., Wenninger, R., & You, J. H.
- Venue
- Fusion Engineering and Design
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-11
- Volume
- 136
- Pages
- 729-741
- ISSN
- 0920-3796 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2807482935
- Cited by
- 303
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 21.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: DEMO design activity in Europe: Progress and updates. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.fusengdes.2018.04.001
- The paper
- Federici, G., Bachmann, C., Barucca, L., Biel, W., Boccaccini, L., Brown, R., Bustreo, C., Ciattaglia, S., Cismondi, F., Coleman, M., Corato, V., Day, C., Diegele, E., Fischer, U., Franke, T., Gliss, C., Ibarra, A., Kembleton, R., Loving, A., . . . You, J. H. (2018). DEMO design activity in Europe: Progress and updates. Fusion Engineering and Design. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fusengdes.2018.04.001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
