Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,094

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Secure integration of IoT and Cloud Computing

Stergiou, Christos, Psannis, Kostas E., Kim, Byung-Gyu, Gupta, Brij·2018·Future Generation Computer Systems

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.future.2016.11.031

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 51

  1. Atzori, 2010, The Internet of things: A survey, Comput. Netw., 2787, 10.1016/j.comnet.2010.05.010 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Roy, 2015, A fog-based DSS model for driving rule violation monitoring framework on the Internet of things, Int. J. Adv. Sci. Technol., 23, 10.14257/ijast.2015.82.03 · DOI
  3. Alsmirat, 2016, Internet of surveillance: a cloud supported large scale wireless surveillance system, J. Supercomput.
  4. Mongay Batalla, 2014, Conception of ID layer performance at the network level for Internet of things, Springer J. Pers. Ubiquitous Comput., 18, 465, 10.1007/s00779-013-0664-0 · doi:10.1007/s00779-013-0664-0
  5. Kryftis, 2016, Efficient entertainment services provision over a novel network architecture, IEEE Wireless Commun. Mag., 23, 10.1109/MWC.2016.7422401 · doi:10.1109/mwc.2016.7422401
  6. Rahimi, 2014, Mobile cloud computing: A survey, state of art and future directions, Mob. Netw. Appl., 19, 133, 10.1007/s11036-013-0477-4 · DOI · Paper page
  7. T. Keskin, N. Taskin, A pricing model for cloud computing service, in: 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Science, 01/10/2014, pp. 699–707. · doi:10.1109/hicss.2014.94
  8. S. Fremdt, R. Beck, S. Weber, Does cloud computing matter? An analysis of the cloud model software-as-a-service and its impact on operational agility, in: 46th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 01/10/2013, pp. 1025–1034. · DOI
  9. Subashini, 2010, A survey on security issues in service delivery models of cloud computing, J. Netw. Comput. Appl., 1, 1
  10. Takabi, 2010, Security and privacy challenges in cloud computing environments, IEEE Comput. Reliab. Soc., 24
  11. George Suciu, et al. Smart cities built on resilient cloud computing and secure Internet of things, in: 2013 19th International Conference on Control Systems and Computer Science, Bucharest, 2013. · DOI · Paper page
  12. Tao, 2014, CCIoT-CMfg: Cloud computing and Internet of things-based cloud manufacturing service system, IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform., 2, 1435
  13. Jiehan Zhou, et al. CloudThings: a common architecture for integrating the Internet of things with cloud computing, in: Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 2013. · DOI · Paper page
  14. Moataz Soliman, et al. Smart Home: Integrating Internet of things with web services and cloud computing, in: 2013 IEEE International Conference on Cloud Computing Technology and Science, Oulu, 2013. · DOI · Paper page
  15. Gubbi, 2013, Internet of things (IoT): A vision, architectural elements, and future directions, Future Gener. Comput. Syst., 1645, 10.1016/j.future.2013.01.010 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Mohammad Aazam, et al. Cloud of things: Integrating Internet of things and cloud computing and the issues involved, in: Proceedings of 2014 11th International Bhurban Conference on Applied Sciences & Technology, IBCAST, Islamabad, 2014. · DOI · Paper page
  17. Botta, 2015, Integration of cloud computing and Internet of things: a survey, J. Future Gener. Comput. Syst., 1
  18. Mohammad Aazam, et al. Smart gateway based communication for cloud of things, in: 2014 IEEE Ninth International Conference on Intelligent Sensors, Sensor Networks and Information Processing, ISSNIP, Symposium on Public Internet of Things, Singapore, 2014. · DOI
  19. Díaz, 2015, State-of-the-art, challenges, and open issues in the integration of Internet of things and cloud computing, J. Netw. Comput. Appl., 99
  20. Zhang, 2016, Social media security and trustworthiness: Overview and new direction, Future Gener. Comput. Syst.
  21. Oliver Niggemann, Gautaman Biswas, et al. Data-driven monitoring of cyber-physical systems leveraging on big data and the Internet-of-things for diagnosis and control, in: International Workshop on the Principles of Diagnosis, DX, 01/08/2015, pp. 185–192.
  22. Batalla, 2015, Advanced multimedia service provisioning based on efficient interoperability of adaptive streaming protocol and high efficient video coding, J. Real-Time Image Process., 1
  23. Park, 2016, Mutual authentication scheme in secure Internet of things technology for comfortable lifestyle, Sensors, 1, 1
  24. Dong, 2010, Improving wireless physical layer security via cooperating relays, IEEE Trans. Signal Process., 58
  25. Aparna K. Nair, et al. Analysis of physical layer security via co-operative communication in Internet of things, in: International Conference on Emerging Trends in Engineering, Science and Technology, ICETEST - 2015, no. 24, 1 1 2016, pp. 896–903. · doi:10.1016/j.protcy.2016.05.162
  26. Hu, 2010, Toward trusted wireless sensor networks, ACM Trans. Sensor Netw., 7, 5:1, 10.1145/1806895.1806900 · DOI
  27. Huang, 2011, Mobile cloud computing, IEEE COMSOC Multimedia Commun. Tech. Comm. (MMTC) E-Lett., 6, 27
  28. Md Whaiduzzaman, 2014, A study on strategic provision of cloud computing services, Sci. World J., 1, 10.1155/2014/894362 · DOI
  29. Garg, 2013, A framework for ranking of cloud computing services, Future Gener. Comput. Syst., 29, 1012, 10.1016/j.future.2012.06.006 · DOI · Paper page
  30. Skourletopoulos, 2016, An evaluation of cloud-based mobile services with limited capacity: a linear approach, Soft Comput., 1
  31. Villars, 2012, The critical role of the network in big data applications, IDC Anal. Future, 1
  32. Florian Pfarr, et al. Cloud computing data protection–a literature review and analysis, in: 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Science, 01/10/2014, pp. 5018–5027. · DOI
  33. Sabine Fremdt, et al. Does cloud computing matter? An analysis of the Cloud Model software-as-a-service and its impact on operational agility, in: 46th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 01/10/2013, pp. 1025–1034. · DOI
  34. Elaine Shi, 2011, Implicit authentication through learning user behavior, Inf. Secur., 99
  35. Haghighat, 2015, CloudID: Trustworthy cloud-based and cross-enterprise biometric identification, Expert Syst. Appl., 11, 7905, 10.1016/j.eswa.2015.06.025 · DOI · Paper page
  36. Madhan Kumar Srinivasan, et al. State-of-the-art cloud computing security taxonomies: a classification of security challenges in the present cloud computing environment, in: ICACCI ’12 Proceedings of the International Conference on Advances in Computing, Communications and Informatics, 03/08/2012, pp. 470–476. · doi:10.1145/2345396.2345474
  37. Y. Mamoon, “Swamp Computing” a.k.a. Cloud Computing, WEB Security Journal, 28/12/2009. [Online]. Available: http://security.sys-con.com/node/1231725 (Accessed 27 July 2016).
  38. Shaikha, 2015, Data Classification for achieving Security in cloud computing, Procedia Comput. Sci., 493, 10.1016/j.procs.2015.03.087 · DOI
  39. Kumar, 2011, Comparison of symmetric and asymmetric cryptography with existing vulnerabilities and countermeasures, IJCSMS Int. J. Comput. Sci. Manag. Stud., 11
  40. Kaur, 2014, Analysis of security algorithms in cloud computing, Int. J. Appl. Innov. Eng. Manag. (IJAIEM), 3, 171
  41. Elminaam, 2009, Performance evaluation of symmetric encryption algorithms, Commun. IBIMA, 8
  42. Singh, 2013, Integrating AES, DES, and 3-DES encryption algorithms for enhanced data security, Int. J. Sci. Eng. Res., 4
  43. Sachdev, 2013, Enhancing cloud computing security using AES algorithm, Int. J. Comput. Appl., 9, 19
  44. Uma Somani, Implementing digital signature with RSA encryption algorithm to enhance the data security of cloud in cloud computing, in: 2010 1st International Conference on Parallel, Distributed and Grid Computing, PDGC - 2010. · DOI · Paper page
  45. Stergiou, 2016, Recent advances delivered by mobile cloud computing and Internet of things for big data applications: a survey, Int. J. Netw. Manag., 1
  46. Huang, 2011, Mobile cloud computing, IEEE COMSOC Multimedia Commun. Tech. Comm. (MMTC) E-Lett., 6, 27
  47. Grozev, 2014, Inter-cloud architectures and application brokering: taxonomy and survey, Softw. - Pract. Exp., 44, 369, 10.1002/spe.2168 · DOI · Paper page
  48. K. Jeffery, Keynote: CLOUDs: A large virtualisation of small things, in: The 2nd International Conference on Future Internet of Things and Cloud, FiCloud-2014, 2014.
  49. He, 2014, Developing vehicular data cloud services in the iot environment, IEEE Trans. Ind. Inf., 10, 1587, 10.1109/TII.2014.2299233 · DOI · Paper page
  50. Dobre, 2014, Intelligent services for big data science, Future Gener. Comput. Syst., 37, 267, 10.1016/j.future.2013.07.014 · DOI · Paper page
  51. Aceto, 2013, Cloud monitoring: A survey, Comput. Netw., 57, 2093, 10.1016/j.comnet.2013.04.001 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 1,094

Metadata

Authors
Stergiou, C., Psannis, K. E., Kim, B.-G., & Gupta, B.
Venue
Future Generation Computer Systems
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-01
Volume
78
Pages
964-975
ISSN
0167-739X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2559094099
Cited by
1,094
References
2
FWCI
105.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Secure integration of IoT and Cloud Computing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.future.2016.11.031
The paper
Stergiou, C., Psannis, K. E., Kim, B.-G., & Gupta, B. (2018). Secure integration of IoT and Cloud Computing. Future Generation Computer Systems. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2016.11.031

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.