The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A stacking model using URL and HTML features for phishing webpage detection
Abstract
Abstract In this paper, we present a stacking model to detect phishing webpages using URL and HTML features. In terms of features, we design lightweight URL and HTML features and introduce HTML string embedding without using the third-party services, making it possible to develop real-time detection applications. Furthermore, we devise a stacking model by combining GBDT, XGBoost and LightGBM in multiple layers, which enables different models to be complementary, thus improving the performance on phishing webpage detection. In particular, we collect two real-world datasets for evaluations, named as 50K-PD and 50K-IPD, respectively. 50K-PD contains 49,947 webpages with URLs and HTML codes. 50K-IPD contains 53,103 webpages with screenshots in addition to URLs and HTML codes. The proposed approach outperforms quite a few machine learning models on multiple metrics, achieving 97.30% on accuracy, 4.46% on missing alarm rate, and 1.61% on false alarm rate on 50K-PD dataset. On 50K-IPD dataset, the proposed approach achieves 98.60% on accuracy, 1.28% on missing alarm rate, and 1.54% on false alarm rate.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.90 · Cited by 235,474
Greedy function approximation: A gradient boosting machine
Friedman, J. H. (2001) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/aos/1013203451 · Cited by 30,731
Distributed Representations of Words and Phrases and their Compositionality
Mikolov, T., Sutskever, I., Chen, K., Corrado, G., & Dean, J. (2013) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1310.4546 · Cited by 24,533
XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System
Chen, T., & Guestrin, C. (2016) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1603.02754 · Cited by 7,104
Ensemble Methods: Foundations and Algorithms
Zhou, Z.-H. (2012) · doi:10.1201/b12207 · Cited by 2,534
A Normalized Levenshtein Distance Metric
Yujian, L., & Bo, L. (2007) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2007.1078 · Cited by 986
Cited by
A comprehensive survey of AI-enabled phishing attacks detection techniques
Basit, A., Zafar, M., Liu, X., Javed, A. R., Jalil, Z., & Kifayat, K. (2021) · Telecommunication Systems · doi:10.1007/s11235-020-00733-2 · Cited by 429
Look before you leap: Detecting phishing web pages by exploiting raw URL and HTML characteristics
Opara, C., Chen, Y., & Wei, B. (2024) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2023.121183 · Cited by 129
An assessment framework for explainable AI with applications to cybersecurity
Calzarossa, M. C., Giudici, P., & Zieni, R. (2025) · Artificial Intelligence Review · doi:10.1007/s10462-025-11141-w · Cited by 40
Metadata
- Authors
- Li, Y., Yang, Z., Chen, X., Yuan, H., & Liu, W.
- Venue
- Future Generation Computer Systems
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-05
- Volume
- 94
- Pages
- 27-39
- ISSN
- 0167-739X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2899992227
- Cited by
- 222
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 32.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A stacking model using URL and HTML features for phishing webpage detection. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.future.2018.11.004
- The paper
- Li, Y., Yang, Z., Chen, X., Yuan, H., & Liu, W. (2019). A stacking model using URL and HTML features for phishing webpage detection. Future Generation Computer Systems. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2018.11.004
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.